Socialism Flashcards
what did antony crosland argue for social democracy
post war revisionist “the future of socialism” 1956 argued that capitalism had radically changed no longer resembles system described by marx “marx has little or nothing to offer the contemporary socialist” growth of kenysian economics industrialisation of key industry rise of professional managers in business CAPITALISM PRODUCED HIGHER LIVING STANDARDS FOR ALL aim of socialism should be to deliver greater social equality and justice through state managed socialism
cooperation
working together collective effort intended to achieve mutual benefit
what do syndicalists offer as an alternative to state socialism
soviet style socialism failed NOT bceause of common ownership, but because of the centeralised state
syndicalists propose property should be owned collectively by groups of workers instead
the workers in each industry are collective owners of their own enterprises
for socialists what are the key traits of human nature
plasticity
sociability
cooperation
how has socialism moved away from collectivism
social democracy accepts private property and economic incentives shift from collectivism to individualism third way privatisation and welfare reform due to increasing concerns of welfare dependency desire to weaken the influence of trade unions
marx quote on the state
the managment committee of the ruling class
what form of common ownership do syndicalists take
industries are owned and run collectively by their own workers
what role does social class play in third way analysis of society
The Third Way instead advocates social inclusion; welfare should target the socially excluded and help people help themselves.
Comfortable with a degree of class division due to support for meritocratic values.
revolution
a fundamental and irreversible change often a brief but dramatic period of upheaval; systemic change typically brought about by the exercising of force
what is the third way difference to neoliberalism
accepts economic theories rejects moral and social implications
explain why democratic socialists believe in the inevitbaility of gradualism
Belief in this led the Fabians to believe that the formation of a socialist political party was necessary, instead of violent revolution.
This is because the extension of the franchise would progressively lead to the establishment of universal adult suffrage, and political equality.
Political equality would work in the interests of the majority – those who decide the outcomes of elections.
This places power in the hands of the working class, traditionally the numerically dominant class in any industrial society.
As capitalism is a system of class exploitation, oppressed workers would be drawn to socialist parties.
These parties reflect working class interests, being committed to eradicating poverty, promoting redistribution: socialist parties are the natural ‘home’ of the working class.
electoral success of socialist parties is guaranteed by the numerical strength of the working classes.
Once in power, socialist parties will be able to carry out a far-reaching reforms, transforming capitalism and creating a more equal and socially just society.
Eventually, socialism would outgrows capitalism.
This is based on the liberal belief that the state is a neutral umpire in society,
social justice
a morally justifiable distribution of wealth usually implying a commitment to greater equality
why do socialists criticised property as it is divisive
fosters conflict in society eg owners and workers employers and employees rich and poor
explain the third way comitmment to the market over the state
adoption of a pro buisness and pro enterprise stance means that the third way attempts to build on neoliberalism “dynamic market economy” acceptance of globalisation and the belief that capitalism has mutated into a knowledge economy
what do marxists think about the state
it is a workers state not necessarily democratic all production and distribution to be under state control marxists aim to create conditions whet the state can wither away non marxists see the state as a permanent institution
why do socialists believe in equality of outcome
promotes cooperation and strengthens social bonds (whereas inequality promotes conflict and instability) equality ensures justice, while inequality derived from unequal treatment by society equality allows personal fulfilment and peoples basic needs to be satisfied
marx/fundamentalist socialists on capitalism
it is all pervasive system of production relations that dominates the state, politics, religon, culture (due to the base/superstructure idea)
total destruction of the capitalist system
it was fundamentally exploitative and that the interests of its two great classes can’t be reconclied
what views is social democracy associated with
capitalism is the only reliable means of generating wealth but is morally defective so wealth should be redistributed the defects of capitalism can be rectified by social and economic intervention, state is custodian of public interest social change brought about peaceful and constitutionally
leninism
lenin’s theoretical contributions to Marxism, notably his belief in the need for a revolutionary or “vanguard” party to raise the proletariat to class consiousness
why do socialists criticised property as it is unjust
wealth is produced by the collective effort of human labour should therefore be owned by the community not by private individuals
explain how marx re-worked hegel’s dialectic
Marx’s analysis of the ‘dialectic’ is based off of Hegel’s theory, that history amounted to the unfolding of a ‘world spirit’ and self-realization.
Engels put it that Marx ‘turned Hegel on his head’ by infusing this Hegelian dialect with a materialistic interpretation.
Marx believed that historical progress is brought about through a dialectical process due to fundamental class conflicts within society, between the owners of the means of production and the workers who sell their labour power.
Marx explained historical change by referencing the internal contradictions within each mode of production, rooted in the existence of private property
social class
a social division based on economic or social factors a group of people who share a similar socio economic position
why do socialists endorse collectivism due to the principle by fraternity
JOHN DONNE “no man is an island” humans work together for the common goods and don’t have selfish individual striving or competition humans are tied together in bonds of humanity as comrades and are united under it humans are inseparable from society neither self sufficent or self contained
explain the third way commitment to competition or market state
concentrate on social investment meaning improving infrastructure, strengthening the skills and knowledge of the country’s workforce education rather than social security education valued because it promotes employability and benefits to the economy governments putpose is to reshape populations attitudes values skills etc rather than economic and social engineering for
why do socialists criticised property as it is morally corrupting
private property breeds acquisitiveness and so is morally corrupting private property encourages people to be materialistic to believe that human happiness or fulfilment can be gained through the pursuit of wealth those who own property wish to accumulate more while those who have little or no wealth long to acquire it
why do socialists criticse foundational equality
Everyone is born equal and so everyone is entitled to equal formal equality (legal, political etc). No one should be discriminated or given privileged.
. Socialists would argue that with this prohibition of state intervention, there will be a deeply unequal society emerging.
Foundational equality ignores the problem of inherited privilege – people do not in modern industrialized society, do not begin life at a level starting point. The privileges that you inherit through family history and the ability to access certain advantages due to financial wealth will always allow some to rise, others to suffer.
Individual is blamed for struggle that is not their fault, rather than structural or institutional problems.
what do democratic socialists think about the state
the state to be democratic and largely pluralist in nature with the assumption that a democratic state would also be just in its outcomes large scale production to be state run
what role does social class play in marxist analysis of society
In the Marxist tradition, class is linked to economic power, as defined by the individual’s relationship to the means of production.
From this perspective class divisions are between the owners of the productive wealth (bourgeoisie) and those who live off the sale of their labour (proletariat).
This conflict is irreconcilable, meaning class conflicts can’t be resolved in the context of capitalism, suggesting a proletarian revolution is necessary to overthrow capitalism.
This leads to social amelioration and class harmony; in emancipating itself from capitalist exploitation, the working class emancipates itself from its own class identity, becoming a fully developed human being.
what do marxists think about freedom
individual freedom is a bourgeois concept collective freedom to be created through equality
why do socialists criticise private property
Firstly it is unjust; wealth is produced by the collective effort of human labour and should thus be owned by the community, not by private individuals.
it encourages people to be materialistic, making people believe that human happiness or fulfilment can be gained through the pursuit of wealth. Those who own property wish to acquire more, whilst those who have little or none long to acquire it – it breeds acquisitiveness and so is morally corrupting.
Lastly, it is divisive: fostering conflict in society e.g. by owners and workers, employers and employees and rich and poor.
capitalism definition
economic system in which wealth is owned by private individuals or businesses goods are produced for exchange according to the dictates of the market
background to social class
Social class is a social division based on economic or social factors; a social class is a group of people who share a similar socio-economic position.
Socialism prior to the mid 20th century was arguably dominated by this, largely due to declining levels of class solidarity and the shrinking of the traditional working class or urban proletariat.
This is as a consequence of deindustrialization and the decline of traditional labour-intensive industries such as coal, steel, etc.
why have socialists justified revolution: it establishes an absolute new system
Revolution has also been advocated by fundamentalism socialists on the grounds that it is the best way in which capitalism can be abolished and replaced by a qualitatively different socio-economic system.
There would be no remainders of capitalism; any would be destroyed in the dictatorship of the proletariat, quelling any possible counter-revolutions by the bourgeoisie.
Thus, if a socialist political party took power through electoral means, it would not be able to enact any real socialist change.
This is because powerful pro-capitalist elites (the owners of big businesses, media barons, the upper echelons of the military and civil service) would be able to frustrate the efforts of any elected socialist government to dismantle capitalism.
This view was summed up by Karl Kautsky, who although he did personally advocate revolution recognized the limits that would be imposed on any socialist government seeking to abolish capitalism. Kautsky argued that ‘the capitalist class does not govern, it contents itself with ruling the government.’
describe the two step process that would occur between capitalism and communism
1 each worker recieves rewards according to the differential value of his or her contribution. This recognises that workers have unequal power and skills and so recieve unequal rewards.
from each according to his ability, to each according to his contribution
2 in the second or higher phase, inequalities between contributions would no longer be recognised and every individual would recieve rewards according to need, not contribution
this implies absolute equality
from each according to his ability, to each according to his need
why is class important to socialists
fundamental divide in society driver of history
why is social class used by socialists as an analytical tool
pre socialist societies socialists believed human beings tend to think and act together with others with whom they share a common economic position or interest social class rather than individuals are the principal actors in history and thus provide the key to understanding social and political change historical change is a product of class conflict - dialectic
bourgeoisie
a marxist term denotes the ruling class of a capitalist society the owners of productive wealth
communism
the principle of common ownership of wealth or a system of comprehensive collectiviszation often referred to as “marxism in practice”
explain lenins concept of a revolutionary vanguard party
Lenin advanced the concept of the revolutionary vanguard party. He argued an elite of professional revolutionaries – the vanguard – could compensate for the weakness of the workers movement within Russian society by assuming a leadership role in the revolution.
Rather than abolish the state, the vanguard should adapt the best parts of the capitalist state to suit the purposes of the new revolutionary order.
This ensures the survival of an administrative apparatus, which Lenin viewed as essential for the construction of post revolutionary order.
what are the differing views on material incetnives
few modern social democrats would contemplate the outright abolition of material incentives
they nevertheless insist on the need for a balance of some kind between material and moral incentives
e.g. socialists would argue that an important incentive for achieving economic growth is that it helps to finance the proviison of welfare support for the poorest and most vulnerable elements of society
why do socialists support equality on the basis of justice of fairness
explain the inequality of wealth simply in terms of differences of ability reflects the largely unequal structure of society people aren’t born exactly identical with the same capacities and skills however, the most significant forms of equality are because of society not nature justice demands people are treated more equally in terms of reward and material
collectivisation
the abolition of private property and the establishment of a comprehensive system of common or public ownership usually through the mechanisms of the state
why does bernstein reject historical materialism
the predictions marx had made had proved to be incorrect - no longer a system of naked oppression
capitalism has shown itself to be bothstable and flexible
the classs divide has not intensified; instead it has become more complex and differentiated
ownership of welath has widened due to the decline of the single powerful industrialist
rise of the middle classs
explain Hevel’s dialectic
two opposing forces conflict of thesis and antithesis producing a higher level, a synthesis which in turn constitutes a new thesis Marx had a materialistic interpretation