Social Psychology Unit 2 Flashcards
Vaccination Study
Tendency of parents to consider future consequences evaluated, and parents then considered risks and benefits of HPV vaccine. Atittudes towards vaccine and potential future regret if daughter catches HPV vaccinated. Agreement to have daughter vaccinated measured.
Results: Parents with a tendency to consider future consequences of their actions had more positive thoughts and attitudes about vaccines and more anticipated regret if they forgo vaccination. They were more likely to have their daughter vaccinated.
Conclusion: some attitudes are formed based on careful consideration of information, and can predict future behavior.
Effect of social networks on attitudes- why?
New social networks can be influential on attitudes, especially when new arguments are being introduced. The desire to fit in and be rewarded is a big motivator
Study on effect of social networks on attitudes
University of Chicago freshmen who entered social groups with more diverse attitudes on affirmative action had more change in their attitudes
Why do we adopt others attitudes?
Social comparison
What is social comparison?
We compare ourselves with others to determine whether our view of social reality is correct
What is a reference group and how does it affect us?
A reference group is people we value and identify with. We adjust our attitudes to be closer to the references group because we want to be similar to people we like.
Effect of norms
People are more likely to express an attitude in the direction of a perceived norm. Norms affect whether we act on our attitudes.
Study on drinking attitudes
Stanford students were randomly assigned to be told that other students’ attitudes towards drinking were either more positive or more negative than their own.
They were more likely to discuss drinking when they believed that other students’ attitudes were more positive than their own. This effect was stronger in students who identified more strongly with the student group.
Effect of vested interest
Vested interest affects attitude extremity. When someone has a vested interest, issues are more likely to be carefully considered, and attitudes will be more resistant to change and more influential on behavior.
Vested interest study
University students were called and asked to campaign against a new law raising the drinking age from 18 to 21. Students younger than 21 were more likely to participate because this would affect them.
Attitudes and context study
Participants from the U.S. and from Hong Kong were asked to read a paragraph and circle pronouns. One group read a paragraph with first-person singular pronouns (independent prime) and the other read a paragraph with first person plural (interdependent priming). Attitudes on independent vs collective attitudes were then measured.
Results: For Americans, control and condition 1 (independent prime) were similar. For the interdependent prime, interdependent values increased and independent values went down.
For subjects from Hong Kong, control and interdependent groups had the same results, and independent group showed higher individualist values and fewer collective values.
Conclusion: context shapes are attitudes.
LaPiere study
1933- La Piere travelled with a Chinese couple to see if they would receive service, and also wrote to each establishment asking if they would serve Chinese patrons. 90% of establishments said no, but less than 1% of establishments actually refused the couple.
Conclusion: attitudes do not necessarily predict behavior. However, it is possible that the presence of La Piere created a situational constraint.
LaPiere study
1933- La Piere travelled with a Chinese couple to see if they would receive service, and also wrote to each establishment asking if they would serve Chinese patrons. 90% of establishments said no, but less than 1% of establishments actually refused the couple.
Conclusion: attitudes do not necessarily predict behavior. However, it is possible that the presence of La Piere created a situational constraint.
Batson moral hypocrisy study
Subjects chose whether they or another person would get to perform a fun task that involved a prize. Only 1/20 subjects said it would be moral to give themselves the job, but 80% of subjects assigned themselves the attractive task
Reagan attitude study
Participants were asked how they felt about Reagan, and response time was noted. Later, the participants were called to see who they really voted for. Responses given quickly predicted behavior better than responses given more slowly.
Conclusion? Strong attitudes are more predictive.
Sierra club study
Subjects were asked how they felt about the environment, conservation, or feelings about Sierra club. The more specific a question was, the more predictive it was.
Conclusion: a specific attitude is more predictive.
Moral hypocrisy
Attempting to appear moral while avoiding the costs of being so
Effect of aggregating behavior
Attitudes are more predictive of behavior when behavior is aggregated. For example, for a single instance, a positive attitude on religion had almost no predictive value. However, over many instances, attitude about religion has a significant predictive value for behavior.
When do attitudes predict behavior?
When they are strong, when other influences on our speech and action are minimal, and when they are specific to a behavior.
IAT pros and cons
IAT can be used to reveal implicit biases which people do not express. However, it has low test-retest reliability, and may only be measuring people’s known associations form culture, not necessarily their own biases.
Mirror study
Researchers affirmed that student group believed it was wrong to cheat. One group was assigned to take a test in front of a mirror, one without a mirror. No-mirror group cheated by going over the time limit 71% of the time, and those who took it in front of the mirror cheated only 7% of the time.
Conclusion? Attitudes are more potent when people are made more self-aware.
Central route of persuasion
Focused on argument, likely to be taken if someone is motivated and able to focus.
Peripheral route of persuasion depends on what factors?
Focuses on cues triggering automatic acceptance, form of argument
Elaboration likelihood model
Persuasion can occur through an effortful central route or a less effortful peripheral route