Social Psychology Unit 2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Vaccination Study

A

Tendency of parents to consider future consequences evaluated, and parents then considered risks and benefits of HPV vaccine. Atittudes towards vaccine and potential future regret if daughter catches HPV vaccinated. Agreement to have daughter vaccinated measured.
Results: Parents with a tendency to consider future consequences of their actions had more positive thoughts and attitudes about vaccines and more anticipated regret if they forgo vaccination. They were more likely to have their daughter vaccinated.
Conclusion: some attitudes are formed based on careful consideration of information, and can predict future behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Effect of social networks on attitudes- why?

A

New social networks can be influential on attitudes, especially when new arguments are being introduced. The desire to fit in and be rewarded is a big motivator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Study on effect of social networks on attitudes

A

University of Chicago freshmen who entered social groups with more diverse attitudes on affirmative action had more change in their attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why do we adopt others attitudes?

A

Social comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is social comparison?

A

We compare ourselves with others to determine whether our view of social reality is correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a reference group and how does it affect us?

A

A reference group is people we value and identify with. We adjust our attitudes to be closer to the references group because we want to be similar to people we like.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Effect of norms

A

People are more likely to express an attitude in the direction of a perceived norm. Norms affect whether we act on our attitudes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Study on drinking attitudes

A

Stanford students were randomly assigned to be told that other students’ attitudes towards drinking were either more positive or more negative than their own.
They were more likely to discuss drinking when they believed that other students’ attitudes were more positive than their own. This effect was stronger in students who identified more strongly with the student group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Effect of vested interest

A

Vested interest affects attitude extremity. When someone has a vested interest, issues are more likely to be carefully considered, and attitudes will be more resistant to change and more influential on behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Vested interest study

A

University students were called and asked to campaign against a new law raising the drinking age from 18 to 21. Students younger than 21 were more likely to participate because this would affect them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Attitudes and context study

A

Participants from the U.S. and from Hong Kong were asked to read a paragraph and circle pronouns. One group read a paragraph with first-person singular pronouns (independent prime) and the other read a paragraph with first person plural (interdependent priming). Attitudes on independent vs collective attitudes were then measured.
Results: For Americans, control and condition 1 (independent prime) were similar. For the interdependent prime, interdependent values increased and independent values went down.
For subjects from Hong Kong, control and interdependent groups had the same results, and independent group showed higher individualist values and fewer collective values.

Conclusion: context shapes are attitudes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

LaPiere study

A

1933- La Piere travelled with a Chinese couple to see if they would receive service, and also wrote to each establishment asking if they would serve Chinese patrons. 90% of establishments said no, but less than 1% of establishments actually refused the couple.
Conclusion: attitudes do not necessarily predict behavior. However, it is possible that the presence of La Piere created a situational constraint.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

LaPiere study

A

1933- La Piere travelled with a Chinese couple to see if they would receive service, and also wrote to each establishment asking if they would serve Chinese patrons. 90% of establishments said no, but less than 1% of establishments actually refused the couple.
Conclusion: attitudes do not necessarily predict behavior. However, it is possible that the presence of La Piere created a situational constraint.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Batson moral hypocrisy study

A

Subjects chose whether they or another person would get to perform a fun task that involved a prize. Only 1/20 subjects said it would be moral to give themselves the job, but 80% of subjects assigned themselves the attractive task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reagan attitude study

A

Participants were asked how they felt about Reagan, and response time was noted. Later, the participants were called to see who they really voted for. Responses given quickly predicted behavior better than responses given more slowly.
Conclusion? Strong attitudes are more predictive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Sierra club study

A

Subjects were asked how they felt about the environment, conservation, or feelings about Sierra club. The more specific a question was, the more predictive it was.
Conclusion: a specific attitude is more predictive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Moral hypocrisy

A

Attempting to appear moral while avoiding the costs of being so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Effect of aggregating behavior

A

Attitudes are more predictive of behavior when behavior is aggregated. For example, for a single instance, a positive attitude on religion had almost no predictive value. However, over many instances, attitude about religion has a significant predictive value for behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

When do attitudes predict behavior?

A

When they are strong, when other influences on our speech and action are minimal, and when they are specific to a behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

IAT pros and cons

A

IAT can be used to reveal implicit biases which people do not express. However, it has low test-retest reliability, and may only be measuring people’s known associations form culture, not necessarily their own biases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Mirror study

A

Researchers affirmed that student group believed it was wrong to cheat. One group was assigned to take a test in front of a mirror, one without a mirror. No-mirror group cheated by going over the time limit 71% of the time, and those who took it in front of the mirror cheated only 7% of the time.
Conclusion? Attitudes are more potent when people are made more self-aware.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Central route of persuasion

A

Focused on argument, likely to be taken if someone is motivated and able to focus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Peripheral route of persuasion depends on what factors?

A

Focuses on cues triggering automatic acceptance, form of argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Elaboration likelihood model

A

Persuasion can occur through an effortful central route or a less effortful peripheral route

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Australia region study

A

In Australia, messages about the benefits of recycled water were more persuasive coming from someone from the same region as the audience.

26
Q

Australia region study

A

In Australia, messages about the benefits of recycled water were more persuasive coming from someone from the same region as the audience.

27
Q

Comprehensive exam study

A

Students were told a required comprehensive exam to get a bachelor’s was being considered either at their own university or at another university, were given a strong or weak argument for it, and argument came either from an expert or non-expert.
If the policy was being considered for their own school, it is more relevant to the subject and argument strength was more important. If they believed it was going to happen at another school, the perceived expertise of the communicator was more important.
Conclusion: when you care, strength matters. When you don’t care, form matters.

28
Q

Need for cognition and persuasion

A

A persuasion target with a higher need for cognition is more likely to take the central route of persuasion.

29
Q

Inoculation

A

A mild attack on a point of view makes one’s defense stronger.

30
Q

Argument discrepancy

A

There is a curve in attitude change- if there is too little or too much discrepancy, no attitude change occurs. Experts can get away with greater discrepancy.

31
Q

Argument discrepancy

A

There is a curve in attitude change- if there is too little or too much discrepancy, no attitude change occurs. Experts can get away with greater discrepancy.

32
Q

3 theories of how behavior influences attitudes

A

cognitive dissonance, self-perception, self-presentation

33
Q

Insufficient justification study

A

Participants were given an hour-long boring task. They were then asked to tell another subject that the study was interesting, and given either $1 or $20 for doing so. They were then asked how interesting the study was. The group that received $1 felt the study was more interesting.
Conclusion: $1 was not a sufficient external justification for the dissonance between thinking the study was boring and saying it was interesting.

34
Q

Insufficient justification study

A

Participants were given an hour-long boring task. They were then asked to tell another subject that the study was interesting, and given either $1 or $20 for doing so. They were then asked how interesting the study was. The group that received $1 felt the study was more interesting.
Conclusion: $1 was not a sufficient external justification for the dissonance between thinking the study was boring and saying it was interesting.

35
Q

Police essay study

A

Anti-police college students were asked to write a pro-police essay. Some were paid $0.50 to do so, some $10. The $0.50 cent group (insufficient justification) said they liked the police more.

36
Q

Robby the Robot study

A

Kids played in a room with multiple toys and were given either a mild or severe threat not to play with Robby the Robot. 2 weeks later when brought back, the mild threat group (insufficient justification) played less with Robby.

37
Q

Weight loss program study

A

Subjects were given either a mild or severe initiation. Of those who went through a severe initiation, 94% lost weight. 38% of the mild initiation group lost weight.
This demonstrates effort justification- those who worked hard to get into the group had to conclude it was a good group and worth their time to justify their effort.

38
Q

Weight loss program study

A

Subjects were given either a mild or severe intiation. Of those who went through a severe initiation, 94% lost weight. 38% of mild initiation group lost weight.
This demonstrates effort justification- those who worked hard to get into the group had to conclude it was a good group and worth their time to justify their effort.

39
Q

Hypocrisy effect

A

The effect of alerting people to the differences between their actions and their attitudes.

40
Q

Condom study

A

Students either were or were not videotaped talking about condom use, and were or were not asked to call to mind times they did not use condoms. They were then given the opportunity to purchase condoms. Of those who were videotaped and recalled times they did not use condoms, 80% purchased condoms and reported more condom use in follow-up. 30-50% of those in other conditions purchased condoms. This demonstrates the hypocrisy effect.

41
Q

Photography class study

A

In a photography class, students were offered the chance to take pictures home. In one condition they could change their minds and bring the picture back, in the other condition they could not. Those who could not change their decision liked their choice more.

42
Q

Photography class study

A

In a photography class, students were offered the chance to take pictures home. In one condition they could change their minds and bring the picture back, in the other condition they could not. Those who could not change their decision liked their choice more.

43
Q

Evidence for dissonance vs. self-perception theory

A

College students were asked to write about the benefits of 7 AM classes. One group was nudged to do this, the other forced. Group 1 started sweating, indicating tension (dissonance)- because they felt they have a choice.

44
Q

Aronson self theory on why dissonance creates tension

A

Lying threatens the idea that the self is good

45
Q

Harmon Jones theory on dissonance

A

Conflicting thoughts have action tendencies and we are tugged between two possible actions. Getting rid of the conflict by committing to a choice encourages action.

46
Q

Milgram obedience study

A

65% of subjects continued to shock at 450 V until the experimenter halted the experiment. 17% went on until the subject stopped responding.

47
Q

Milgram manipulations

A

victim proximity- compliance drops to 40% when learner is in the same room
authority proximity- when the authority figure is giving instructions over the phone, obedience drops to 21%.
Disobedience model- when confederates model disobedience, 10% went to the end of the board.
Indirect participation- when the subject only read the words and someone else was hitting the shock buttons, 93% of participants went to the end of the board.

48
Q

What was not manipulated in any of the Milgram study conditions?

A

Gradual commitment- increasing by 15 V at a time. Cognitive dissonance plays a role in why people don’t stop- why stop at this point when you would do 15 V less?

49
Q

What was not manipulated in any of the Milgram study conditions?

A

Gradual commitment- increasing by 15 V at a time. Cognitive dissonance plays a role in why people don’t stop- why stop at this point when you would do 15 V less?

50
Q

Sherif study

A

Independently people came to stable estimates on how far the light moved, when in a room together answers converged. After separating they continue to give the conforming answer.
Conclusion? They have internalized the answer as being right.

51
Q

Sherif study

A

Independently people came to stable estimates on how far the light moved, when in a room together answers converged. After separating they continue to give the conforming answer.
Conclusion? They have internalized the answer as being right.
It is important that this is a situation where the correct answer is ambiguous. When people are more confused, tehy are more likely to conform.

52
Q

Distinguish between the Sherif study and the Asch study

A

Sherif study- ambiguous situation, people have accepted the answer as correct.
Asch- non-ambiguous, people are complying, not accepting the answer as correct. This situation creates some stress in subjects.

53
Q

Distinguish between the Sherif study and the Asch study

A

Sherif study- ambiguous situation, people have accepted the answer as correct.
Asch- non-ambiguous, people are complying, not accepting the answer as correct. This situation creates some stress in subjects.

54
Q

Types of conformity

A

Normative and informational

55
Q

What is evidence for normative conformity

A

Normative conformity relates to compliance, not acceptance, and is evidenced by a discrepancy between private and public behavior.

56
Q

Towel study

A

3 messages:
1. help save environment
2. partner with us to save the environment
3. join your fellow guests in helping to save the environment
Message #3 results in 34% more towel reuse

57
Q

Situations in which conformity is greater

A
  • more cost to bucking the norm
  • more people against you
  • when you think others know more than you
  • when everyone is against you (even a single ally reduces conformity)
58
Q

Effect of number of confederates in the Asch study

A

Less conformity when there are fewer confederates giving the wrong answer

59
Q

what type of people conform?

A
  • low in self-esteem, for both normative and informational reasons
  • low in expertise
60
Q

Study on difficult decisions

A

People ranked appliances and got to choose between second and third choice or second and seventh choice. People ranked their rejected choice lower only if they had made the difficult choice, showing that it changed their attitude

61
Q

How can you reduce dissonance?

A

Knowing about dissonance, or having self compassion for your inconsistency