Social Psychology Flashcards
Reinforcement Theory
behavior is motivated by anticipated rewards
Albert Bandura
coined social learning theory. He proposed behavior is learned through imitation.
Role Theory
the perspective that people are aware of social roles they are expected to fill, and much of their observable behavior
can be attributed to adopting these roles.
Cognitive Theory
has been influential in social psychological theory and research. Perception, judgement, memories and decision making are all examples of cognitive concepts that have influenced social behavior.
What are the components of an attitude?
cognition or beliefs, feelings, and behavioral predisposition. Attitudes are usually expressed in opinion statements
Consistency Theories
hold that people prefer consistency, and will change or resist changing attitudes based upon this preference. If a person is aware of an inconsistency the according to consistency theories, the person will try to resolve it
What are inconsistencies in consistency theory?
viewed as stimuli or irritants and often are resolved by changing attitudes.
Fritz Heider’s Balance Theory
is concerned about how elements are related: the person whom we are talking about, some other person, and a thing idea or some other person. Balance exists when all three fit together harmoniously. When there isn’t balance there will be stress and a tendency to remove this stress by achieving balance.
Who coined cognitive dissonance theory?
Leon Festinger
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
conflict that one feels when your attitudes are not in synch with your behavior. In general, the greater the dissonance the greater the pressure to reduce dissonance.
Things to remember:
- If a person is pressured to say or do something contrary to his or her privately held attitudes, there will be a tendency for him or her to change those attitudes.
- The greater the pressure to comply, the less the person’s attitude will change. Ultimately, attitude change generally occurs when the behavior is induced with minimum pressure.
How can dissonance be reduced?
changing dissonant elements or adding consonant elements.
Free-choice dissonance
when a person makes a choice between several desirable outcomes
spreading the alernatives
an approach to reducing dissonance. the relative worth of two alternatives is spread apart.
Forced-compliance dissonance
when an individual is forced into behaving in a manner that is inconsistent with his or her beliefs or attitudes.
Festinger and Carlsmith(1959)
classic experiment where subjects were asked to perform extremely boring tasks. After one hour of doing this subjects were to tell the “next subject”(who was a confederate) that the experiment was enjoyable and interesting. Some subjects were paid 1 dollar and others 20 dollars. Most of the subjects complied with experimenter’s request. After complying they were taken into another room and asked to give ratings of the experiment. The 1 dollar group actually reported enjoying the experiment more than the 20 dollar group.
Minimal Justification Effect (insufficient justification effect)
When someone does something and there is minimal justification for them doing it, this creates more dissonance than if they can explain it through a significant rationale. when an individual utilizes internal motivation to justify a behavior.
Who coined self-perception theory?
Daryl Bem
Self perception theory
when your attitudes are weak and ambiguous you observe your own behavior and attribute an attitude to yourself. Basically, people infer what their attitudes are based on observations of their own behavior.
Overjustification Effect
if you reward people for something they already like doing, they might stop liking it
Carl Hovland Model
deals with attitudes change as a process of communicating a message with the intent to persuade someone. There are three components: the communicator, the communication and the situation.
Carl Hovland and Walter Weiss(1952) credibility
they prepared articles on some controversial topics of that era. Conclusions: communications by highly credible sources were more effective in changing attitudes than were communication by low credibility scores.
Sleeper Effect
Over time the persuasive impact of a high credibility source decreased while the persuasive impact of the low credibility source increased.