Social Psychology Flashcards
What is meant by the term obedience?
Following a direct order from someone we believe to be an authority figure.
What is a confederate?
Someone in on the experiment.
Social influence is…?
The process by which individuals and groups change each other’s attitudes and behaviours.
What was a common explanation from the German’s when they were asked to explain their killings?
That they were just following orders from their superiors.
Name two of Milgram’s aims.
- To research how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person.
- To see how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities (for example the Germans in WW2).
Name 8 facts about Milgram’s procedure.
Volunteer sampling was used It was a lab experience by Investigating “learning” 40 makes Aged between 20-50 Jobs ranged from unskilled to professional From New Haven area Paid $4.50 just for turning up
What happened at the beginning of Milgram’s experiment?
They were introduced to another ppt who was actually a confederate. They drew straws to determine roles (the learner or the teacher) but it was fixed so the confederate was always the learner.
Besides the participant and confederate, who else was at Milgram’s experiment and name one fact about this person.
There was an “experimenter” who was dressed in a gray lab coat (an actor).
Name three facts about how the setting of Milgram’s actual experiment was arranged.
Two rooms were used
In Yale University
With an electric chair for the learner and electric shock generator for the teacher
Outline the basics of what the learners and teachers roles were in the Milgram’s experiment.
Learner is strapped to the chair with a list of words to learn, after the teacher tests him by naming a word and asking the learner to pick its pair from 4 possible choices. And the teacher must administer an electric shock every time the learner makes a mistake and increasing the shock levels each time. The learner gave mainly wrong answers on purpose.
Give two pieces of information about the shock generator in Milgram’s experiment.
There were 30 switches on it marked from 15 volts to 450 volts (danger/severe shock)
When the teacher refused to give the electric shock in Milgram’s experiment he was given the standard instruction, consisting of 4 pride, saying…
Prod 1- please continue
Prod 2- the experiment REQUIRES you to continue
Prod 3-it is ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL that you continue
Prod 4- you have NO OTHER CHOICE but to continue
What percentage of ppts continued to 300 volts in Milgram’s experiment?
100%
What percentage of ppts continued to the highest level of 450 volts in Milgram’s experiment?
65%
The participants showed moral strain, but felt powerless to disobey. What 4 psychological reactions did ppts show in Milgram’s experiment?
Sweating, shaking and groaning. Three participants had a seizure.
How many variations did Milgram do of his study? And what was the difference in all of them?
18 variations.
He altered the IV (situation) to see how it affected the DV (obedience).
What did Milgram believe he would find by altering the IV to see its affect on the DV?
He believed he could show it was the situation people found themselves in (not their natural evil) which made them obedient. So by changing he environment it would change the likelihood that they would obey.
Name 4 things Milgram concluded from his experiment.
Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figure even to the extent of killing a human being
Obedience to authority is ingrained in us all from the way we are brought up.
People tend to obey orders from other people if they recognise their authority as morally right or legally based.
There was nothing NATURALLY evil about the Germans.
Why was it a disadvantage that Milgram used a laboratory study for his experiment?
A highly controlled situation would have been set up so ppts would know they are being tested so may act differently so there may have been demand characteristics.
Why might some critics say that the ppts in Milgram’s study had probably guessed the aims and were just going “along with it”?
Because they had been paid and didn’t want to upset the experimenter.
Why is it a problem if ppts didn’t believe they were administering real electric shocks?
Because it wouldn’t be a valid test of how obedient someone would be when asked to inflict harm on someone else. (Lacks credibility)
What percentage of people said after Milgram experiment that they didn’t believe it was real?
75%