Social Psychology Flashcards

1
Q

Kitty Genovese

A

Was assaulted and murdered in her apartment. No one in her building or outside of the building (38 people) called the police despite seeing and hearing what was going on.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The Smoke-Filled Room Study

A

Darley and Latané in 1968. Participants either alone or with 2-3 other participants were in a room and could see smoke escape from a door. 75% reported the smoke when alone while 10% reported it when in the presence of others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The Seizure Study

A

Participants having a conversation with one or more other students via intercom and one person seems to be having a seizure. 85% seek help when alone while 31% seek help when with others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In Order For an Intervention to Occur

A

1) Notice the event.
2) Interpret the event as an emergency.
3) Assume responsibility.
4) Know the appropriate form of assistance.
5) Decide to implement help.
6) Offer help.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bystander Effect

A

The presence of other people decreases the likelihood of helping behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conformity

A

Adjusting our behaviour or thinking to coincide with the group. Affected by group size, group unanimity, and confidentiality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Normative Social Influence

A

We follow social norms (unwritten rules for behaviour) to avoid rejection and gain approval. We don’t want to stand out or be punished.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Asch’s Line Judgment Study (1951)

A

When asked which line matches the target line, 75% of the participants gave the wrong answer when hearing 7 others give the wrong answer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Informational Social Influence

A

When we assume that the group knows something we don’t so we look to others for information especially in new or ambiguous situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Obedience

A

Complying with a direct request from an authority figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Milgram Experiment (1962)

A

Participants must deliver a shock to the “learner” when they get an answer wrong. Shocks become increasingly more intense. Learner protests, asks to leave, screams, refuses to answer, complains of heart problems, and falls silent. The experimenter says that the experiment needs to continue. The majority of participants continued to the end.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why Do People Obey?

A

1) Diffusion of responsibility.
2) Pluralistic ignorance (seeing more people doing something makes it seem that it is okay).
3) Entrapment (starting with something that is wrong at low intensities makes it harder to quit at higher intensities).
4) Obedience is less likely when there is less legitimacy to authority figures, more group dissent, and more proximity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Thin-Slice Judgments

A

We form quick impressions of others based on thin slices of behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Attribution

A

Inference regarding the cause of an action, event, or behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fundamental Attribution Error

A

We overestimate the influence of internal dispositions and underestimate the influence of situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Self-Serving Bias

A

We blame the situation for bad things and we give ourselves credit for good things.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Prejudice

A

An unjustifiable (usually negative) attitude towards a group and its members. Is often cultural, ethnic, gender, or sexual orientation groups. Is a pre-judgment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Components of Prejudice

A

1) Beliefs (stereotypes)
2) Emotion
3) Behaviour (discrimination)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Explicit Prejudice

A

Consciously held attitudes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Implicit Prejudice

A

Automatic, unconscious learned associations between social groups and specific qualities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Shooter Bias

A

More shoot errors on Black men holding neutral objects and more not shoot errors on White men holding guns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Roots of Prejudice

A

1) Categorization and outgroup homogeneity (underestimate diversity in outgroups ex. Own-race bias).
2) Ingroup bias.
3) Social inequality.
4) Emotional scapegoating.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Transference

A

The tendency to treat one person as if they possess the traits or characteristics of another more familiar person. For example, in psychotherapy, clients might respond to a therapist in ways that resemble the dynamic they have with major figures in their own lives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

False Consensus

A

The tendency to overestimate the extent to which other people’s beliefs and attitudes are similar to our own.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Impression Management

A

A series of strategies that people use to influence the impressions that others form of them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Self-Promotion

A

To be seen as competent. Ex. mentioning a recent award you received while on a job interview.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Ingratiation

A

To be seen as likeable. Ex. congratulating your friend on a recent success.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Exemplification

A

To be seen as dedicated. Ex. volunteering to work an extra shift at your job.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Intimidation

A

To be seen as dominant. Ex. sneering at an opponent during a sports competition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Supplication

A

To be seen as needy. Ex. tearing up and holding your knee after falling and getting hurt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Attribution

A

Assignment of a causal explanation for an event, action, or outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Fundamental Attribution Error

A

The tendency to assume that people’s actions are more the result of their internal dispositions than of the situational context.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Self-Serving Attributions

A

The attributions people make for their own behaviours or outcomes. We tend to make dispositional attributions for positive events but situational attributions for negative events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Affective Forecasting Errors

A

People’s inability to accurately predict the emotional reactions they will have to events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Attitude

A

An orientation towards some target stimulus that is composed of an affective feeling, a cognitive belief, and a behavioural motivation towards the target.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Implicit Attitude

A

An automatically activated evaluation of a stimulus ranging from positive to negative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Explicit Attitude

A

The consciously reported evaluation a person has in response to a target stimulus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)

A

A theory of persuasion contending that attitudes can change by two different routes, a central route that focuses on the strength of the argument and a peripheral route that is sensitive to more superficial cues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Central Route

A

Relies on more thoughtful, reflective processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Peripheral Route

A

When attitudes are swayed by surface-level features and more automatic associations.

41
Q

Need For Cognition

A

The extent to which an individual is inclined to engage in and enjoy cognitively effortful activities such as thinking hard about problems and contemplating their own thought processes.

42
Q

Cognitive Dissonance

A

A sense of conflict between people’s attitudes and actions that motivates efforts to restore cognitive consistency.

43
Q

Post-Decision Dissonance

A

Happens when we have to forgo an option that we have a positive attitude towards.

44
Q

Social Norms

A

The patterns of behaviour, traditions, and preferences that are tacitly approved of by a given culture or subculture.

45
Q

Conformity

A

The process by which people implicitly mimic, adopt, or internalize the behaviours and preferences of those around them.

46
Q

Informational Social Influence

A

Pressure to conform to others’ actions or beliefs based on a desire to behave correctly or gain an accurate understanding of the world.

47
Q

Normative Social Influence

A

Pressure to conform to others’ actions or beliefs in order to gain approval from others or avoid social sanctions.

48
Q

Deindividuation

A

Losing sight of our own individuality.

49
Q

Social Facilitation

A

An enhancement of the dominant behavioural response when performing a task in the mere presence of others. Easy or well-learned tasks are performed better but difficult or novel tasks are performed worse.

50
Q

Social Loafing

A

The tendency for individuals to expend less effort on a task when they are doing it with others rather than alone.

51
Q

Group Polarization

A

A tendency for people’s attitudes to become more extreme after they discuss an issue with like-minded others.

52
Q

Groupthink

A

A form of biased group decision making whereby pressure to achieve consensus leads members of the group to avoid voicing unpopular suggestions.

53
Q

Aggression

A

Any behaviour directed toward the goal of harming another living being (the intention to hurt someone).

54
Q

The General Aggression Model

A

An integrative framework of the various factors and psychological processes that contribute to an act of aggression (what factors predict the likelihood that people will act aggressively?).

55
Q

Weapons Effect

A

A phenomenon whereby simple exposure to a gun or weapon can increase aggressive responses by bringing violent thoughts to mind.

56
Q

Prosocial Behaviour

A

Actions aimed at assisting others towards their goals.

57
Q

Kin Selection

A

An evolved or adaptive strategy of assisting those who share one’s genes, even at personal cost, as a means of increasing the odds of genetic survival.

58
Q

Norm of Reciprocity

A

An automatic tendency to help others who have helped in the past or are expected to help in the future.

59
Q

Empathy Gap

A

The inability to accurately stimulate the mental suffering of another person.

60
Q

Bystander Effect

A

The lower likelihood of people coming to the aid of a victim when in the presence of other observers than if they are alone.

61
Q

Pluralistic Ignorance

A

A situation that can occur when people are collectively unaware of each other’s true attitudes or beliefs.

62
Q

Diffusion of Responsibility

A

A tendency for people in a group to assume that someone else is in a better position to act or has already acted.

63
Q

Stereotypes

A

Mental representations or schemas that summarize the beliefs and/or associations we have for a group of people.

64
Q

Prejudice

A

A negative attitude towards a group or members of a group.

65
Q

Discrimination

A

A tendency for individuals to receive different treatment or outcomes as a result of their membership in a given social group.

66
Q

Realistic Group Conflict Theory

A

A theory asserting that negative intergroup attitudes develop whenever groups compete against one another for access to the same scarce resources.

67
Q

Social Identity Theory

A

A theory that explains why people develop a more positive attitude towards their own ingroup than towards outgroups.

68
Q

Symbolic Racism

A

The tendency to redirect one’s prejudice towards a racial or ethnic group to the policies that might benefit that group.

69
Q

Implicit Racial Bias

A

Differential treatment resulting from the automatic activation of, and failure to control, negative attitudes or stereotypes of a racial group.

70
Q

Explicit Racial Bias

A

Results from negative attitudes and stereotypes that are openly endorsed and freely expressed.

71
Q

Aversive Racism

A

A tendency, even among egalitarian-minded people, to have unconscious negative reactions to people of racial or ethnic outgroups.

72
Q

Contact Hypothesis

A

The proposal that prejudice can be reduced through sanctioned, friendly, and cooperative interactions between members of different groups working together as equals towards a common goal.

73
Q

Social Identity Theory

A

The tendency to favour one’s own group (self-esteem).

74
Q

Realistic Group Conflict Theory

A

In group bias can be harmful when we are in conflict with another group.

75
Q

System Justification Theory

A

Rationalizing the status quo.

76
Q

Stereotype Threat

A

Fear of confirming a negative stereotype about one’s group, leading to underperformance.

77
Q

3 Attraction Predictors

A

1) Familiarity
2) Similarity
3) Reciprocity

78
Q

Familiarity

A

Liking those who are familiar (mere exposure effect).

79
Q

Similarity

A

Liking those who are like us.

80
Q

Reciprocity

A

Like those who express liking for us.

81
Q

The Matching Hypothesis

A

We tend to pair up with others whose desirability (mate value) is similar to our own.

82
Q

Forming Intimacy

A

Self-disclosure.

83
Q

The Interpersonal Process Model of Intimacy

A

The development of intimacy depends on A’s self-disclosure, B’s response, and A’s reaction to B’s response.

84
Q

Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love

A

1) Intimacy
2) Passion
3) Commitment

85
Q

Intimacy

A

Feelings of closeness and affection.

86
Q

Passion

A

The drive that leads to romantic and physical attraction/desire.

87
Q

Commitment

A

The decision to love and commitment to maintain that love.

88
Q

Passionate Love (Romantic Love)

A

Intimacy and passion. Tends to fade over time.

89
Q

Companionate Love

A

Intimacy and commitment. Tends to increase over time. Deep caring, concern, and companionship. Associated with greater satisfaction and happiness.

90
Q

Conflict

A

Any time what you want, feel, say, or do is incompatible or at odds with what your partner wants, feels, says, or does.

91
Q

Types of Conflict

A

1) Goal Interference
2) Unequal Exchange
3) Bad Behaviour

92
Q

The 4 Biggest Predictors of Divorce in the Next 5 Years

A

1) Criticism
2) Defensiveness
3) Contempt
4) Stonewalling

93
Q

Criticism

A

Verbally attacking personality or character versus complaint of behaviour.

94
Q

Defensiveness

A

Victimizing yourself as a form of self-protection and to reverse the blame.

95
Q

Contempt

A

Conveying your moral superiority by ridiculing the other person.

96
Q

Stonewalling

A

Withdrawing to avoid conflict and get distance.

97
Q

Negative Behaviour

A

Beneficial when severe problems and problems are solvable BUT harmful when minor problems and problems are unsolvable.

98
Q

Positive Behaviour

A

Beneficial when problems are minor or partners are defensive BUT harmful when serious problems remain unaddressed.