Social psych - midterm 2 Flashcards
ch 7, 9 + some of 8
what is another name for “liking”?
interpersonal attraction
need for affiliation
a desire to establish social contact with others (relatively stable trait)
results of social exclusion (2)
(1) increased sensitivity to interpersonal information and (2) less effective cognitive functioning
self-disclosure
revealing our innermost thoughts and feelings
why do we respond to real-life threats with the desire to affiliate? (3)
(1) social comparison, (2) cognitive clairty and (3) emotional clarity
dimensions of affect (2)
(1) intensity/ valence and (2) arousal
a positive affect, regardless of its source, often leads to _____ _____ of other people (and vice versa)
positive evaluations
ways in which positive/ negative affect lead to positive/negatve evaluation of others (2)
(1) directly and (2) indirectly
when another peson says or does something that makes us feel good or bad, those feelings have a ___ effect on how much we like them
direct
indirect effects of affect on liking and disliking are also called…
associated effects
when unrelated events or people in you life impact whether you like or dislike someone, that is an ___ effect
indirect/associated
how do indirect effects of affect on attraction work?
the person is merely present at the same time as your emotional state is aroused by something unrelated
why do indirect effects of affect have such a large impact on attraction?
classical conditioning
proximity
physical nearness to others
situation-centered determinant of attraction
proximity
repeated exposure effect
the more often we are exposed to a new stimulus the more favorable our evaluation of it tends to become
based on the repeated exposure effect, do infants smile at photographs of people they’ve seen before or new faces more?
photographs of people they’ve seen before
what is the exception to the “increased contact = greater liking” equation?
when initial reactions to another person are negative, repeated contact leads to reduced rahter than increased attraction
why does increased frequency of exposure to another person increase liking of that person?
tend to feel more comfortable with that person and perceive that person as more responsive
stereotyping
making assumptions about social groups in terms of the traits they are beleived to share
Lemay, Clark and Greenberg’s (2010) steps to the stereotype “what is beautiful is good” (3)
(1) target is physically attractive, (2) we desire to form relationships with attractive people and the desire leads us to (3) perceive them as interpersonally responsive in return
female faces that are “attractive” (2)
(1) childlike features and (2) mature features
which colour is considered the most attractive by men?
red
Moreland & Beach 1992 study on the repeated exposure effect
college classroom assistants attended class either 15, 10, 5 or 0 times and students were then asked to indicate how much they liked them; the more they attended the more they were “liked”
characteristics associated with round body builds (3)
(1) easygoing disposition, (2) relaxed personality and (3) lack of personal discipline
characteristics associated with firm and muscular bodies (3)
(1) good health, (2) high energy and (3) vigor
characteristics associated with a thin and angular body (2)
(1) intellegence and (2) introspective personality
sources of liking based on social interaction (2)
(1) similarity and (2) social skills, personality traits and gender differences
similarity hypothesis
similarity is often the basis for important relationships such as friendships
Galton’s findings on the similarity of married couples
spouses did in fact resemble one another in many respects
Newcomb’s (1956) study on similarity
similar attitdues predicted subsequent liking between univesity transfer students
complementarities
differences that, when combined, help to make the individual parts work well together/ mutual reinforcing (i.e., complement each other)
examples of complementarities (3)
(1) dominant to submissive, (2) talkative people to quiet ones and (3) sadists to masochists
do direct tests support or fail to support the idea of complementarities as a determinant of attraction?
fail to support
is attraction based more strongly in similarity or complementarity?
similarity
similarity-dissimilarity effect
similarity tends toarous psoitive feelings and dissimilarity tends to arouse negative feelings
attitude similarity
the extent to which two individuals share the same ways of thinking or feeling toward something or another person
steps in Byrne’s (1961) laboratory experiments on attitude similarity (2)
(1) attitudes of the participants assessed and (2) these individuals were exposed to the attitudes, beliefs, vlaues and interests of a stranger and asked to evalute that person
results of Byrne’s 1961 study on attitude similarity
people consistently indicated that they liked strangers similar to themselves much better than they liked dissimilar ones; also judged those who were more similar as more intelligent, better informed, more moral and better adjusted than those who were dissimilar to them
proportion of similarity
attraction can be predicted by inserting (topics with shared similar views divided by total topics discussed) into a simple formula; the greater the proportion of similarity the greater the liking
matching hypothesis
we tend to choose partners who are similar to ourselves in physical attractiveness
study on the matching hypothesis
observers rated attractivess of two individuals in a video and the extend to which each partner engaged in efforts to make a favorable impression + partners each rated their interest in dating the stranger; men invested more energy in interactions with people of similar attractiveness but women did not show strong effort either way
implicit egotism
positive feelings about ourselves spill over into increased attraction toward otehrs who share the same trivial characterisitics
balance theory
people naturally orgnaize their likes and dislikes in a symmetrical way (because it is emotionally pleasant); similarity = balance, dissimilarity = inblance and dislike = nonbalance
social comparison theory (Festinger 1954)
you compare your attitudes and beliefs with those of others because the only way you can evaluate the accuaracy of your views and their “normality” is by finding that other people agree with you
what theory explain why similairty should matter?
social comaprison theory (Festinger 1954)
consensual validation
evidence that someone else shares our views
how does the rule of reciprocity operate with respect to attraction?
we tend to like those who express liking toward us and dislike those who express dislike for us
social skills
a combinations of aptitudes that help individuals who possess them to interact effectively with others
breakdown of social skills (4)
(1) social astuteness/ perception, (2) interpersonal influence, (3) social adaptability and (4) expressiveness
social astuteness/ perception
capacity to perceive and understand others accurately
interpersonal influence
ability to change others’ attitudes or behaivour by using a vairety of technqieus
social adaptability
capacity to adapt to a wide range of social situations and to interact effectively with a wide range of people
expressiveness
ability to show emotions openly, in a form others can readily perceive
narcissism
inflated views of ones self, an extreme and unjustified high self-esteem, largely ignore the needs and feeligns of others
why do narcissists seem likable at first?
initially viewed as charming, extraverted, more open and even more competent than other people
characteristics that both women and men uniformly find desirable in others (romantically) (4)
(1) trustworthiness and (2) cooperativeness, followed by (3) agreeableness and (4) extraversion
desirable characteristics across relationship types (4)
(1) trustworthiness and (2) cooperativeness followed by (3) agreeableness and (4) extraversion
do we value charactersitics the same regardless of relationship type?
their are four top valued charactersitics regardless and then other traits that we value differentially based on kind of relationship
do men or women value physical attraciveness more in romantic partners?
men
what trait do women assign great importance to in choosing romantic partners?
potential future earning
parental investment theory
the one who invests and risks the most in reporduction (female) will be the most particular when selecting a mate
love
a combination of emotions, cognitions, and bheaviours that play a crucial role in close relationships
falling in love leads to an increase in … (2)
(1) self-efficacy and (2) self-esteem
basic features of love (2)
(1) desire and (2) commitment
triangular model of love (Sternberg 1986)
each love relationship is made up of three basic components that are present in varying degrees in different couples; intimacy, passion and decision/ commitment
triangular model of love: intimacy
the closeness two people feel and the strength of the bond that holds them together
triangular model of love: passion
the secual motives and sexual excitement associatied with a couple’s relationship
triangular model of love: decision/ commitment
cognitive factors such as the decision to love and be with a person, plus a commitment to maintain the relationship on a permanent or long-term basis
Sternber’s types of relationships (7)
(1) liking (intimacy), (2) romantic love (intimacy+passion), (3) infatuation (passion), (4) fatuous love (passion+commitment), (5) empty love (decision/commitment), (6) companionate love (intimacy+commitment) and (7) consummate love (intimacy+passion+commitment)
companionate love
love based on a close relationship in which two people have a great deal in common, care about each other’s well-being and express mutual liking and respect
consummate love
balance of intimacy, passion and commitment/decision; ideal but difficult to attain
passionate love
emotional and often unrealistic response to a person; sexual attraction, strong emotional arousal, the desrie to be physically close and an intense need to be lvoed as much as you love the other person
unrequited love
when feelings of love are not returned by the partner
basic factors of passionate love (3)
(1) have a concept of passionate love and believe it exists, (2) an appropriate love object must be present and (3) you must be in a state of physiological arousal that can then be interpreted as the emotion of love
factors threatening to passionate love (2)
(1) jealousy and (2) infidelity
important characteristics people seem in a potential romantic parnter (2)
(1) physical beauty and (2) youth
jealousy
concerns that a romantic partner or other person about whom we care deeply might, or has already, transferred their affection or loyality to another person
when we are jealous things taste more…
bitter
why does jealousy occur?
anticipated or actual social rejection threatens our self-esteem
infidelity
a partner’s betrayal through intimate relations with others
effect of infidelity
increased depression
what is the relationship between power and infidelity?
more power, the greather their infidelity or intended infidelity
why does power lead to increased infidelity?
confidence
attachement style
the degree of security an individual feels in interpersonal relationships
infant’s basic attitudes acquired during early interactions with an adult (2)
(1) self-esteem and (2) interpersonal trust
interpersonal trust
involves general expectancies and beliefs about other people and is based on whether the caregiver is perceived by the infant as trustworthy, dependable and reliable.
what comes first, attitudes about self-esteem/ interpersonal trust or language?
basic attitudes about self-esteem/interpersonal trust
secure attachement style
high in self-esteem AND trust; best able to form lasting, committed, satisfying relationships throughout life; parent is always there when needed
fearful-avoidant attachement style
low in both self-esteem and interpersonal trust; tend to not form close relationships or tend to have unhappy ones
preoccupied/ anxious/ambivalent attachement style
low self-esteem and high interpersonal trust; desire closeness and readily form relationships but cling to others while expecting to be rejected eventually because they believe themselves to be unworthy; patent responds or is available sometimes but not other times
dismissing-avoidant attachment style
high in self-esteem and low in interpersonal trust; beleive that they are very deserving of good relationships but fear genuine closeness (say they don’t need or want close relationships with others)
can attachment styles change?
although they are formed early in life, they are NOT set in stone and can be changed by life experiences
life consequences of insecure attachement styles (5)
(1) lower performance in shcool as adolescents, (2) form fewer friendships, (3) often turn into “outsiders”, (4) higher levels of stress when they have conflicts within relationships and (5) are more likely to commit suicide (especially fearful-avoidant style)
among elementary school children, those ____ (with/without) siblings are found to be liked less by their classmates
without
steps of friendship (3)
(1) proximity, (2) maintained in part by mutual interests and by (3) positive experiences together
what role does similarity play in developing friendships?
perceived similarity appears to be more improtant than underlying reality (European student study)
how do advertisers/ politicians use understandings of how affect impacts attraction to sell products/ get voters?
they use indirect/ associated effects of emotions to arouse positive feelings about their product/ platform
what is the relationship between proximity and familiarity?
proximity -> repeated exposure effect -> familiarity (-> increased attraction)
“what is beautiful is good” effect
we tend to project positive interpersonal traits onto people we find attractive
close friendships
involve interacitng in many different situations, providing mutual social support and engaging in self-disclosure
prosocial behaviour
actions by individuals that has the goal of helping others, often, with no immediate benefit to the helpers
empathy
the capacity to be able to experience other’s emotional states, feel sympathetic toward them and take their perspective
empathy-altruism hypothesis
feelings of empathy for somene in need produces an altruistic motivation to help that person
components of empathy (3)
(1) emotional aspect (emotional empathy), (2) a cognitive component (empathic accuracy) and (3) emapthic concern
emotional empathy
sharing the feelings and emotions of others
empathic accuracy
perceiving other’s thought and feelings accurately
empathic concern
feelings of concern for another’s well-being
what did Gelason (2009) find about the relationship between empathic accuracy and social adjustment?
adolescents with high empathic accuracy have better social adjustment (more friends, more liked by thier peers, better quality friendships, less likely victimized by bullying or social exclusion)
what is the relationship between empathy and brain activity?
activity in brain regions identified as including motor neurons is higher for those high in empathic capacity
mirror neurons and ASD
individuals with this disordershow reduced activity in the mirror neuron system and reduced capacity to experience empathy
mirror neurons are active when observing what?
other’s emotional expressions, but not when the facial movements are unrelated to emotions (ex: chewing or sneezing)
how can activity in the mirror neuron regions be increased?
compassion training