social policy in 19th century england Flashcards
old poor laws (16th- 19th century)
- poorhouses / ‘indoor relief’
- late 18th century: war, famine, price increases
- Speenhamland system:‘outdoor relief’
- first cash benefit paid by the state to the poor
- a supplement to wages
- based on an assessment of needs: the price of bread and numbers in family
Reactions to the spread of the Speenhamland system
- Speenhamland didn’t go far enough to meet the needs of the working poor
- Speenhamland made workers ‘lazy and demoralised’
- Speenhamland was ‘too expensive and inefficient’
3 competing ‘discourses of welfare’ in early 19th century Britain
Radicalism – egalitarian, focus on political institutions of the state, motivated by social justice
Evangelicalism – religious, conservative, focus on moral habits of the poor, motivated by humanitarian concern
Utilitarianism – ‘scientific progress’ to maximise utility; focus on machinery of government, motivated by a drive for ‘efficiency’.
Radicalism
Universal rights
Equality and social justice
Chapter 5: blueprint for a ‘welfare state’
Evangelicalism and philanthropy
Evangelicals such as Hannah More (1790s Bath) Philanthropic mission Key idea: ‘Army of Christ’ The problem: disordered families The solution: philanthropy through casework The aim: remoralization of the poor
The origins of social work
Introduced 1857 by the Bible and Domestic Female Mission
Developed by the Charity Organisation Society
Casework approach
Intended to separate the ‘deserving’ from the ‘undeserving’ poor
Utilitarianism
Classical liberal economics
You can only know what people want/need from the choices they make
Actions can only be judged by their consequences
The best moral actions are those that produce the maximum happiness (utility) for the greatest number
The modern prison system (Jeremy Bentham)
“a mill to grind rogues honest and idle men industrious”
i.e. to ‘nudge’ people into making the right moral choices
What is the speenhamland system
This level varied according to the number of children and the price of bread
sliding-scale of wage supplements in order to mitigate the worst effects of rural poverty.
This level varied according to the number of children and the price of bread.
Growth of the Speenhamland system 1790s-1820s
Rising cost of outdoor relief:
1785: £2m 1818 : £8m
and costs of administering the system
Establishment concern about fraud/abuse of the system of outdoor relief: “Destructive to the morals of the most numerous class and to the welfare of all” Royal Commission on the Poor Laws and the Relief of Distress (1832)
New Poor Law (1834)
attempted to fundamentally change the poverty relief system
The Act was intended to curb the cost of poor relief, and address abuses of the old system,
Attack on outdoor relief
New large workhouses covering much larger areas and a union of parishes
Poor Law Unions, controlled by Boards of Guardians, funded by rates (taxes) paid by men with property
with only a few Radicals (such as William Cobbett) voting against.
When did poor law come in?
1834
The workhouse system
The principle of ‘less eligibility’
“The position of the pauper should not be made nearly or apparently so eligible as that of the independent labourer of the lowest class”
(Poor Law Commission 1832)
The classification of paupers
Aged paupers / Infirm paupers / Able-bodied paupers
separate provision for each group within the workhouse
The workhouse in practice
Most poor relief now ‘indoor’, not ‘outdoor’
15% of relief continued as ‘outdoor relief’ – to the ‘deserving poor’
Use of workhouse for the next 100 years
Workhouse population became increasingly aged.
3 competing ‘ideologies of welfare’ in early 19th century Britain
Evangelicalism – conservative, focus on moral habits of the poor, motivated by humanitarian concern
Radicalism – egalitarian, focus on political institutions of the state, motivated by social justice
Utilitarianism – ‘scientific progress’ to maximise utility; focus on machinery of government, motivated by ‘efficiency’.
Then (1780’s- 1830’s)
Growing numbers of dispossessed wage labourers not paid enough to live on
Speenhamland – the invention of benefits
Reactions to Speenhamland system
Harsher new system – the workhouse