SOCIAL - OBEDIENCE Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What does obedience mean?

A

Obedience means to obey a direct order from an authority figure, even when obeying means going against one’s own moral code: an example is a soldier obeying orders.

Obedience is a form of social influence.

Yielding to these demands is considered to be obedience,
Rejecting the demands is known as dissent.

Dissent can produce relief from moral strain once an individual has removed themselves from the situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

MILGRAM 1963 BASIC STUDY

What was the aim of this study?

A

Milgram aimed to test the idea that ‘Germans were different’ when they carried out orders to persecute Jews and others during the Second World War. He asked how far ‘ordinary people’ would go if ordered to administer what they bought were electric socks to someone else.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain the social approach as a whole.

A

The social approach is about people, both as individuals and as part of a group or groups, and how people live together comfortably - and when they do not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

MILGRAM 1963 BASIC STUDY

What was the procedure of this study?

A

Volunteers were recruited for a controlled experiment investigating “learning” (re: ethics: deception).

Participants were 40 males, aged between 20 and 50, whose jobs ranged from unskilled to professional, from the New Haven area. They were paid $4.50 for just turning up.

At the beginning of the experiment, they were introduced to another participant, who was a confederate of the experimenter (Milgram).

They drew straws to determine their roles – learner or teacher – although this was fixed and the confederate was always the learner. There was also an “experimenter” dressed in a gray lab coat, played by an actor (not Milgram).

Two rooms in the Yale Interaction Laboratory were used - one for the learner (with an electric chair) and another for the teacher and experimenter with an electric shock generator.

The “learner” (Mr. Wallace) was strapped to a chair with electrodes. After he has learned a list of word pairs given him to learn, the “teacher” tests him by naming a word and asking the learner to recall its partner/pair from a list of four possible choices.

The teacher is told to administer an electric shock every time the learner makes a mistake, increasing the level of shock each time. There were 30 switches on the shock generator marked from 15 volts (slight shock) to 450 (danger – severe shock).

The learner gave mainly wrong answers (on purpose), and for each of these, the teacher gave him an electric shock. When the teacher refused to administer a shock, the experimenter was to give a series of orders/prods to ensure they continued.

There were four prods and if one was not obeyed, then the experimenter (Mr. Williams) read out the next prod, and so on.

Prod 1: Please continue.

Prod 2: The experiment requires you to continue.

Prod 3: It is absolutely essential that you continue.

Prod 4: You have no other choice but to continue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MILGRAM 1963 BASIC STUDY

Name 5 issues (criticisms) of this study, why is this a problem?

A

(see page 8 in the student guide)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

MILGRAM 1963 BASIC STUDY

What were the results of this experiment?

A

100% - 300V
65% - 450V

Many Ppt were very distressed.
One had a full-blown seizure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

MILGRAM 1963 BASIC STUDY

What were the conclusions of this study?

A

Milgram concluded that an ordinary person would obey orders from an authority to an extreme extent even when they were very uncomfortable about doing so.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

MILGRAM 1963 BASIC STUDY

GRAVE this study.

A

Some strengths and weaknesses are on page 8 and 9 in the student guide.

Explain each reason, why does this affect the validity etc?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How many variation studies did Milgram carry out?

A

19

only need to know 7, 10 and 13

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

MILGRAM EXPERIMENT 7 VARIATION

What was the variation?
What were the results?
What was the conclusion?

A

EXPERIMENTER ABSENT

The experimenter is out of sight and giving orders over the telephone.

22.5% obeyed to the full voltage.

Concluded that if someone wants to be obeyed, they are better being face-to-face than giving orders over the shine or from a distance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

MILGRAM EXPERIMENT 7 VARIATION

Give two strengths and two weaknesses of this study.

A

(see page 9 in the student guide)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

MILGRAM EXPERIMENT 10 VARIATION

What was the variation?
What were the results?
What was the conclusion?

A

INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT

Set up the study in a run-down office block.

47.5% were fully obedient

Setting did not have as much impact as other factors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

MILGRAM EXPERIMENT 10 VARIATION

Give two strengths and two weaknesses of this study.

A

(see page 10 in the student guide)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

MILGRAM EXPERIMENT 13 VARIATION

What was the variation?
What were the results?
What was the conclusion?

A

ORDINARY MAN ORDERS

When the experimenter leaves the room, another person who was in the room takes over - in charge but without the grey coat. The other person suggests going up one switch at a time and so is the one giving the orders.

20% were fully obedient.

The uniform or the role of the person giving orders lead to high obedience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

MILGRAM EXPERIMENT 13 VARIATION

Give two strengths and two weaknesses of this study.

A

(see page 10 in the student guide)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Briefly name 7 other variations of Milgram’s study other than 7, 10 + 13. (can use these in evaluation points)

A

(see page 10 in the student guide)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are 12 ethical issues arising from obedience studies?

for use in evaluation and discussion

A

(see page 11 in the student guide)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the Agency theory?

A

People obey because of being in an agent state.

19
Q

What is moral strain?

A

The pressure of doing something against one’s feelings of right and wrong.

They feel it is immoral or unjust.

This moral strain results in an individual feeling very uncomfortable in the situation and, in extreme circumstances, they show anxiety and distress.

The anxiety is felt as the individual contemplates dissent and considers behaving in a way that contradicts what they have been socialised to do..

20
Q

What is the autonomous state?

A

A human acts according to their own free will.

When a person is acting as an individual they are in the autonomous state.

21
Q

Who found evidence for agency theory?

A

Gupta (1983) found evidence for the shift of responsibility to the experimenter, suggesting people obey because of being agents of the authority figure. She found obedient makes in her study accepted 27.6% of the responsibility; those who did not obey accepted 49.4% of the responsibility.

22
Q

Give 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses of agency theory.

A

(see page 12 in the student guide)

23
Q

What is Social Impact Theory?

A

The way people act in the presence of other, including being obedient. Social Impact Theory looks at how the opinions of others (individuals and groups) affect us.

Latané and Wolf (1981) suggested that groups affect an individual’s attitudes depending on the size and status of the group.

Milgram found that when someone else disobeyed, a Pp was also more likely to disobey, which suggests that behaviour is affected by the presence of others (exp. 17)

Depends on:

  • The no. other people in the environment
  • The immediacy of the impact (wether the message is given by people you know)
  • Strength of the impact (such as persuasion power of those giving the message)

Means that if more people are giving the message, it is strong, the the greater the impact.
Fits with Milgram’s findings - more obedience if the experimenter was an authority figure than if an ‘ordinary man’.

24
Q

Give 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses of Social Impact Theory.

A

(see page 12 in the student guide)

25
Q

Compare social impact theory and agency theory as explanations of obedience.

A

(see page 13 in the student guide)

26
Q

What 4 factors affect obedience?

A
  • personality
  • gender
  • culture
  • situation
27
Q

Give some supporting evidence that personality affects obedience. What is the problem with this evidence?

A

(see page 13 and top of page 14 in the student guide)

28
Q

Give 2 issues to show there might be personality differences in obedience.

A

(see page 14 in the student guide)

29
Q

Give 2 issues to show there are probably not personality differences in obedience.

A

(see page 14 in the student guide)

30
Q

Describe the evidence for whether culture does or doesn’t affect obedience.

A

(see page 14 in the student guide)

31
Q

Give 2 issues to show there might be a cultural differences in obedience.

A

(see page 15 in the student guide)

32
Q

Give 2 issues to show there are probably not cultural differences in obedience.

A

(see page 15 in the student guide)

33
Q

Describe the evidence for whether gender does or doesn’t affect obedience.

A

(see page 15 in the student guide)

34
Q

Give 2 issues to show there might be gender differences in obedience.

A

(see page 15 in the student guide)

35
Q

Give 2 issues to show there are probably not cultural differences in obedience.

A

(see page 15 in the student guide)

36
Q

Describe the evidence for whether situation does or doesn’t affect obedience.

A

(see page 16 in the student guide)

37
Q

Give 2 issues to show there might be situational differences in obedience.

A

(see page 16 in the student guide)

38
Q

Give 2 issues to show there are probably not situational differences in obedience.

A

(see page 16 in the student guide)

39
Q

What are 6 points as to when people might resist to orders more?

A
  • Can see the ‘victim’
  • Involved directly in the punishment
  • Not in a setting that supports the authority
  • Person giving the orders is remote, not there
  • Someone else is seen to resist
  • Confusion in the orders, maybe someone else gives different orders

(see page 16 in the student guide for some e.g.)

40
Q

What was Milgrams theory to the evolution of obedience?

A

Milgram observed that human society was hierarchical in. nature, he proposed it must have evolved as. this. for some survival function; where societies that adopted this hierarchy survived and those who didn’t died out.

How also thought the social organisation must have some stabilising function - to create social order and harmony within the group. Without obedience there would be challenges to this social order resulting in chaos and societal breakdown.

Just as we. are born with the capacity for language, we are innately prepared to be obedient. Exposure to authority figures (within family and eduction) nurtures this preparedness through the process if socialisation. They ue a system of rewards and punishments to encourage obedience and discourage dissent in young children.

41
Q

What is the agent state?

A

When given instructions by an authority figure, the human switches themselves to the agent state of mind, where. they see themselves acting as an agent for the authority figure.

The shift into the agent state relieved moral strain as the individual displaces the responsibility of the situation onto the authority figure, thereby absolving them of the consequence of their actions.

42
Q

Evaluate whether obedience is a cause of nature or nurture.

A

Milgram - obedience is not a dispositional trait (nature) but consequence of the situation in which a person finds themselves in (environment)

Arendt (1963) - obedience is an ingrained behaviour established through the process of socialisation. Behaviour manifests as we are exposed to authority figures under certain environmental conditions conducive to compliance, such as closeness and status of the authority figure.

43
Q

Read page 19 in the big blue text book.

A

understand?

44
Q

Who proposed social impact theory?

A

Bibb Latané (1981)