Social norms and conformity Flashcards
Conformity
Change in behavior because of the influence of other people (real or imagined presence)
Social norms
Guidelines that establish what behaviors, beliefs, and/or values are acceptable in a particular context
Functions of norms
Master the world and increase/maintain connection with others
Informational social influence
Conform to others’ behavior because we believe their interpretation of a situation is correct
Normative social influence
Conform to others’ behavior because we want to be accepted by them
Study on informational social influence
Had participants view a light in a dark room alone - auto-kinetic effect, had to judge how much it moves (varies by person); had participants view light with 2 other participants, over several trials they started to converge on the same answer
Private acceptance
Informational social influence, genuinely believe information even when we are alone
Public compliance
Want to be accepted, perform behavior even though we don’t necessarily believe it
Study on normative social influence (Asch, lines)
Presented with a line and 2 comparison lines, had to choose the one closest in length (obvious answer); confederates give right answer first then wrong answer in subsequent trials; most participants conformed on at least one trial; follow up study, participants write down answer instead, conformed much less
Social impact theory
Three factors that contribute to normative social influence: strength (how important group is to you), immediacy (how close group is physically), and number (how big group is)
Follow up on Asch study
Participants given an ally, much less likely to conform
Minority influence
Occurs when a minority of group members influence behaviors or beliefs of the majority of the group
Injunctive norms
Perceptions of what others want us to do/ not do
Descriptive norms
What we notice others actually doing in certain situations regardless of how desirable behavior is
Study on injunctive vs descriptive norms (hotel towels)
Gave guests either standard sign (appeal to save environment, injunctive norm) or manipulated sign (join your fellow guests to help save environment - 75% reuse towels, descriptive norm); reusing rates were significantly higher with descriptive norms sign
Door-in-the-face technique
Ask for a really big request expecting refusal and then ask for a smaller request that you actually wanted
Study on door-in-the-face (volunteering)
Either asked students to spend 2 hours chaperoning a trip or asked them to spend 2 years volunteering then asked for 2 hours; more likely to say yes in second condition; why - you say no and are sensitive to the fact that the other person made a concession, so you want to concede as well and say yes to the next request (reciprocity)
Foot-in-the-door technique
First make a small request, then later make a larger request
Study on foot-in-the-door (yard sign)
Asked participants if they would put up an ugly large sign vs asked if they would put up a small sticker then later asked if they would put up an ugly large sign; more likely to say yes in second condition; why - committed to being agreeable/supporting the cause, if you say no to second request you experience cognitive dissonance
Lowball procedure
Offer a good deal, then “something happens” to make the deal less desirable (person wants to behave consistently with initial commitment, works best when initial commitment is public)
Lure/bait and switch
First ask someone to do something appealing, then say you actually need them to do another task instead
That’s-not-all technique
Initial request followed by something that sweetens the deal before the person can answer
Deadline technique
Sales are effective when they say the deadline is coming up
Playing hard to get
Making it seem like many other people want you/what you’re selling
When do we conform to informational social influence
When situation is ambiguous, during a crisis, and when others are experts
Boomerang effect
Efforts to change behavior using norms backfires; people performing behavior at a below-average level have a risk of performing it higher compared to people performing at an above-average level
Propaganda
Systematic attempt to shape perceptions, manipulate cognitions, and direct behavior to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent