Social Living Flashcards
(34 cards)
Agnostic
Behaviour related to physical conflict:
- Offensive
- Defensive
- Submissive
Aggressive
Behaviour that threatens or delivers physical injury:
-Direct, discrete interaction
John Maynard Smith and Price
- Evolutionary stable strategy
- Game theory
- More than 2 players who can make decisions
Hawk- Dove Model
Hawk- Always engage in aggression or escalate it.
Dove- Give up when one escalates.
Resource Holding Potential
Parker, 1974
Ones ability to win an all-out fight if one were to take place.
Deciding to fight
When winning is high the value of the resource is very high and the cost is very low.
Coalitions
‘A coalition is a coordinated attack by two or more individuals on one or more opponents, the so-called targets’ (Chapais 1995)
Coalition and Alliances
Options:
- Relatives if available, familiar and trustworthy
- Highest RHP individual available
Coalition and Alliances’ constraints
- Demographic structure
- Choices of others
- Personal dominance rank
Winner and loser effects
If one is losing a fight they undergo physiological processes whereby they essentially give up. How one does in one fight may affect how they do in their next one.
Social Dominance
If two individuals fight and one wins and the other loses, the next time these two individuals come to fight they must ignore it as experience tells them that the same one will probs win again.
Dominant Individuals
Net benefits but they’re not expected to win every fight only the ones that matter.
Subordinate Individuals
Alternate sneaky strategies,
best of a bad job.
Dominance
Dyadic. Interactions and relationships.
Rank (Status)
Position across individuals. Relationships > Social structure. Primates aware of their relative rank.
Linear
A is dominant to B who is dominant to C
Triangular
A is dominant to B who is dominant to C whose dominant to D but D is dominant to B
Complex
A is dominant to B who is dominant to C whose dominant to D who is dominant to E but E is dominant to C and F
Egalitarian
Such as Tonkean Macaques
Despotic
Japanese Macaque
Female Primate Hierarchies
- Matrilineal
- Size/age related
- RHP/ Contest based
Matrilineal inherited dominance
Small group -Intrinsic power (RHP) -Dominant FF=> RS Medium group -Matriline size/ rank correlation -Kin based alliances Large group -High ranking matrilines -Dominant ranking -Rank/RS - Family grows faster - Maintains Dominance (Dunbar, 1988)
Why be dominant?
If you’re in a high ranking lineage the juveniles have a larger body mass as they get older.
Females of a high rank have a higher reproductive success.
Lower stress
- Socially astute
- Confident
- High ranking