Social learning theory explanation Flashcards
What is SLT?
learning through observations and imitating behaviours that are rewarded
What did Bandura propose about gender development?
Gender development is the result of learning from social agents who model and reinforce gender role behaviour
What is indirect reinforcement?
- Child learns through vicarious reinforcement
- Sees examples of gendered behaviour through media, people, home,
- by observing they gradually learn about gender appropriate behaviour
- Thus learning behaviour (through observation) and whether they are worth repeating
Why is vicarious reinforcement vital?
Although boys and girls may observer characteristics of both sexes, only likely to repeat behaviours of people they identify with
What is the role of mediational processes?
- info about reinforcement is stored as an expectancy of future outcomes
- When appropriate opportunity arises in the future, children will display behaviours if they observed a greater reward than punishment
- This display of such beh is modelling or imitation but depends on indirect reinforcement and opportunity
What is maintenance through direct reinforcement?
- if rewarded for certain gendered related behaviour = more likely to repeat action in similar situation.
A03 there is supporting evidence
- bandura’s bobo doll study
- demonstrated effects of adult model on children aggressive behaviour also shown for gender
- Perry and Bussey showed film clips to children age 8 - 9
selecting apple, pear or gender neutral item - when given choice they pick items of the same sex gender
- suggests children are more likely to imitate gender behaviours from gender-appropriate models supporting the key idea of identification and imitation in SLT.
A03 However children only imitated same-sex behaviour as long as the behaviour was not counter to gender stereotypes.
- e.g. man wearing a dress
- Suggests that there are factors that influence the imitation of gender appropriate behaviours
- may be better explained by the GST
- SLT alone cannot account for all gender development
A03 Limitation as it does not provide adequate explanation of how learning processes change with age
- the general implication of SLT is that modelling of gender appropriate behaviour can occur at any age i.e. from birth onwards
- it is oversight to say children who are 2yold learn the same as 9yold
- Conflicts with kohlberg’s theory that children are not active in the gender development until constancy is reached
- Suggests that influence of age and maturation is not considered by SLT
- Calls into question whether it is a complete explanation
A03 Strength it explains cultural differences in gender development which is not considered like in biological explanations
- Exists a clear cut distinction to what people thought as stereotypically masc/fem behaviour than in 1950’s
- Shift cannot be attributed to biological changes
- likely shift in societal and cultural norms mean that new forms of gender behaviour either punished or reinforced
- equally, social learning and cultural norms can explain why some cultures show different behaviours to typical western views of masc/fem (mead’s research)
- Therefore SLT can explain gender development throughout time, increasing historical validity.