social learning theory - bandura et al (1963,1965) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

aim of his 1963 study (2)?

A
  1. investigate whether a filmed model would have the same effect as a live model on children’s aggression
  2. investigate whether cartoon aggression would have similar impact to realistic filmed aggression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

setting ? (63)

A

lab experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

experimental design ? (63)

A

independant groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how many ppts ? (63)

A
  • 48 boys
  • 48 girls
  • so 96 overall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how old were the ppts ? (63)

A

39-52 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

where were the ppts selected from ? (63)

A

stanford university nursery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was the independent variable ? (63)

A

the model (live, filmed or cartoon)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the dependant variable ? (63)

A

level of aggression the children displayed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what were the four conditions ? (63)

A
  1. live aggression
  2. filmed realistic aggression
  3. cartoon aggression condition
  4. control group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what were the findings ? (63)

A
  • all three experimental groups displayed increased aggression
  • total acts of aggression:
    1. live = 83
    2. filmed realistic = 92
    3. cartoon = 99
    4. control = 54
  • difference between the aggressive groups not significant - but the difference between them and control was significant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

conclusion? (63)

A

exposure to live or filmed aggression increases the likelihood of aggression in response to frustration, even if the aggression is modelled by a cartoon figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

aim of ‘65 ?

A

aim was to consider whether reinforcement and punishment of an aggressive model would influence the aggression displayed by observers (children) in response to frustration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

number of ppts ? (‘65)

A
  • 33 boys
  • 33 girls
  • 66 overall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

age of ppts? (‘65)

A

42-71 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

independent variable ? (‘65)

A

the observed consequence for the model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

dependent variable ? (‘65)

A

the aggression in the children

17
Q

what were the three conditions ? (‘65)

A
  1. model-rewarded condition
  2. model-punished condition
  3. no-consequence
18
Q

what was the reward in the ‘65 study ?

A

a drink and a chocolate

19
Q

all three groups from ‘65 were made frustrated by being shown toys that they were not allowed to play with (as it was in all the previous bandura studies), but what was different this time when the children were invited to play with the BOBO Doll ?

A

the children (all the groups) were later offered attractive rewards to aggress towards the doll

20
Q

what were the findings ? (‘65)

A
  • children in model-punished group were significantly less aggressive that the other two groups
  • however, introducing the promise of a reward wiped out the difference, increasing the scores significantly for all groups
21
Q

what was the conclusion? (‘65)

A

vicarious punishment reduces imitated aggression. however, the promise of reinforcement is a more powerful influence on aggression

22
Q

internal validity of both ?

A
  • strength of both is that the controls used reduced the impact of extraneous variables
  • matched pairs design used
  • non-aggressive condition allowed researchers to control for spontaneous aggression
23
Q

competing argument for validity of both?

A
  • bandura’s research only showed short-term effects
  • aggression was only shown towards a doll (lacks ecological validity)
  • therefore, despite the clever design - findings don’t necessarily explain aggression in real life
24
Q

why did both experiments have problems with demand characteristics ?

A
  • elements of the procedure could have cued the children as to how they were expected to behave
  • noble (1975) reports that one child arriving at the lab for the experiment said, ‘look mummy, there’s the doll we have to hit’
  • means experimental procedures may lack validity - we cannot be sure if the children were performing under demand characteristics or not
25
Q

what is an application of both studies ?

A
  • further strength of SLT is that it has informed the development of the sabido method
  • bandura and sabido pioneered the use of telenovelas to tackle specific social problems in countries all over the world
  • viewers identify with the actors and they become role models - these shows have been shown to have an effect on prompting behavioural change
  • this shows that SLT has made a significant contribution in promoting behaviours which are of the benefit to individuals and also to wider society