Social influence (P2) Flashcards

1
Q

bickman - aim

A

investigate the degree of social power the uniform has on other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

bickman- hypothesis

A

a uniformed guard ahs more ability to influence individuals than same person in low authority uniform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

bickman (experiment 1) design

A

field experiment- new york , Brooklyn
independent measures design
opportunity sample (150 adults)
weekdays in the afternoon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

bickman-3 situtations (experiment 1)

A

picking up a bag, “i have a bad back”
dime and meter “i dnt have any change”
bus stop and no standing ““its the new law”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

bickman - 3 uniforms (experiment 1)

A

civilian
milkman
guard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

bickman- results (experiment 1)

A

guard was significantly more obeyed than the civilian or milkman
no significant difference between milkman and the civilian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

bickman (experiment 2)

A

field experiment, brookyln
48 pedestrians
dime and meter scenario

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

bickman - independent variables (experiment 2)

A

two levels of authority- guard and civilian
surveillance or non surveillance
(if the confederate stood next to the experimenter when asked for a dime)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

bickman - results

experiment 2

A

surveillance had no significant effect on if they obeyed or not
guard was obeyed more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bickman (experiment 3a) method

A

140 students
questionnaire
29 different scenarios, if requests from a guard, milkman or civilian were perceived as legitimate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Bickman (experiment 3a) results

A

guard was not perceived as more legitimate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bickman (experiment 3b)

A

180 college students

asked to predict what they and other people would do in on of the scenarios in experiment 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bickman (experiment 3b)- results

A

didn’t think the guard would have more social power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bickman - conclusions

A

wearing a uniform gives more power and influence
higher status=more power
how people think they will behave is not a good predictor of real behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bickman - criticisms

A

opportunity sampling - unknown factors that influenced behavior
culturally biased- not generalizable #
unethical- participants could not give their consent
field experiment- little control over extraneous variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

define dispositional

A

how our own personality can affect whether or not we will obey or conform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

self esteem on conformity

A

how we perceive ourselves

low self esteem = more likely to conform due to a lack of belief in own ability

18
Q

kurosawa

A

recreation of asch line study

high pressure AND low self esteem = more likely to conform

19
Q

informational conformity and self esteem

A

explained by self esteem

unsure of their ability to respond and behave in a ‘correct manner’ will look to others and imitate behavior

20
Q

locus of control

A

external-believe they have very little or no control+ no option to obey
internal- believe they have the ability to control their decisions and own lives
more confident and motivated

21
Q

crowd situations with a internal locus

A

are less likely to be influenced by how the crowd is behaving
take apart in protests- believe that have influence to change

22
Q

kohlberg stufy- effect of morality

A

logitudinal study 12 years

a group of boys, how their moral thinking changed and developed

23
Q

kohlberg level 1

A

pre- conventional
children are focused on consequences and being punished
action is based on if its beneficial to individual

24
Q

kohlberg level 2

A

conventional
pleasing and getting approval from other people
based on obeying authority

25
kohlberg level 3
post conventional defined by what has been aggreged upon by society- lawful behavior based on more abstract ideas of justice and what is ethical
26
influence of the brain on dispositional factors
- positive correlation between self esteem and grey matter in hippocampus (emotion and ability to control stress) - damage to the prefrontal cortex and faulty moral reasoning
27
criticism of dispositional factors
focus too much on the individual , generalising is difficult reductionist locus of control depends on situation - doesn't explore this
28
define situational factors
how external factors influence our behaviour
29
two types of majority influence
normative and informational
30
normative conformity
go along with the group norm change behaviour to be liked doesn't internalise opinion ensures ensures society generally functions successfully
31
Asch study
what line was longer ? confederates said the wrong answer one confederate who didn't agree with the group was enough to reduce the rates of conformity
32
informational conformity
because they are unsure of the answer internalise their response to be perceived as correct
33
in group
some on who is apart of your group | same class, team , interests
34
out group
not in your group
35
deindividuation
explanation for why behave differently in crowds lose their sense of individuality and feel more anonymous feel less accountable for action and assume their will be no negative consequences
36
collectivist culture
needs of group are more important than individual needs | expect to help out
37
individualist culture
needs of individual are more important than the needs of the group competitive and work hard they do house work for a rewards
38
altruism
helping others without expecting rewards
39
autonomous state
when the individual fells responsible for their own actions
40
agentic state
does not feel responsible because they were acting under orders from an authority figure
41
criticism of situational factors
suggest behaviour is determined, free will? not everyone conforms in the same way reductionist, individual differences