Social influence (P2) Flashcards
bickman - aim
investigate the degree of social power the uniform has on other people
bickman- hypothesis
a uniformed guard ahs more ability to influence individuals than same person in low authority uniform
bickman (experiment 1) design
field experiment- new york , Brooklyn
independent measures design
opportunity sample (150 adults)
weekdays in the afternoon
bickman-3 situtations (experiment 1)
picking up a bag, “i have a bad back”
dime and meter “i dnt have any change”
bus stop and no standing ““its the new law”
bickman - 3 uniforms (experiment 1)
civilian
milkman
guard
bickman- results (experiment 1)
guard was significantly more obeyed than the civilian or milkman
no significant difference between milkman and the civilian
bickman (experiment 2)
field experiment, brookyln
48 pedestrians
dime and meter scenario
bickman - independent variables (experiment 2)
two levels of authority- guard and civilian
surveillance or non surveillance
(if the confederate stood next to the experimenter when asked for a dime)
bickman - results
experiment 2
surveillance had no significant effect on if they obeyed or not
guard was obeyed more
Bickman (experiment 3a) method
140 students
questionnaire
29 different scenarios, if requests from a guard, milkman or civilian were perceived as legitimate
Bickman (experiment 3a) results
guard was not perceived as more legitimate
Bickman (experiment 3b)
180 college students
asked to predict what they and other people would do in on of the scenarios in experiment 1
Bickman (experiment 3b)- results
didn’t think the guard would have more social power
Bickman - conclusions
wearing a uniform gives more power and influence
higher status=more power
how people think they will behave is not a good predictor of real behavior
Bickman - criticisms
opportunity sampling - unknown factors that influenced behavior
culturally biased- not generalizable #
unethical- participants could not give their consent
field experiment- little control over extraneous variables
define dispositional
how our own personality can affect whether or not we will obey or conform
self esteem on conformity
how we perceive ourselves
low self esteem = more likely to conform due to a lack of belief in own ability
kurosawa
recreation of asch line study
high pressure AND low self esteem = more likely to conform
informational conformity and self esteem
explained by self esteem
unsure of their ability to respond and behave in a ‘correct manner’ will look to others and imitate behavior
locus of control
external-believe they have very little or no control+ no option to obey
internal- believe they have the ability to control their decisions and own lives
more confident and motivated
crowd situations with a internal locus
are less likely to be influenced by how the crowd is behaving
take apart in protests- believe that have influence to change
kohlberg stufy- effect of morality
logitudinal study 12 years
a group of boys, how their moral thinking changed and developed
kohlberg level 1
pre- conventional
children are focused on consequences and being punished
action is based on if its beneficial to individual
kohlberg level 2
conventional
pleasing and getting approval from other people
based on obeying authority