Social Influence Completed Flashcards
What is conformity?
A change in a person’s behavior/opinions due to real/imagine social pressure.
What are the types of conformity proposed by Herbert Kelman?
- Internalization
- Identification
- Compliance
What is the internalization type of conformity?
Deep conformity/accept majority view as correct/permanent change in behavior/opinion even when group is absent.
What is the identification type of conformity?
Moderate conformity/act like a group we value and want to be a part of/publicly change opinions/behavior when privately disagree.
What is the compliance type of conformity?
Superficial/temporary conformity/go along with majority view/privately disagree/group pressure stops change.
What do Morton Deutsch and Harold Gerard propose as an explanation for conformity?
A two-process theory involving informational social influence (ISI) and normative social influence (NSI).
What is informational social influence (ISI)?
Agree with majority = we believe they’re correct/we desire to be correct too/leads to internalization/likely in new/difficult situations.
What is normative social influence (NSI)?
Agree with majority to be accepted/desire to be liked [social approval]/leads to compliance.
What are the evaluation points for the types and explanations of conformity?
S: Lucas = children answered aloud maths problems = conformity: difficult > easy
W: nAffiliators = not applicable to everyone = can’t generalize
W: difficult to identify NSI/ISI = doubt two independent processes = less validity/reliability
S: Asch = participants said wrong answer = afraid of disapp.
What was the procedure for Asch’s research into conformity?
Participants shown ‘standard line’ and 3 ‘comparison lines’; correct answer obvious; participants asked to match the standard.
Naive participant + 6 confederates; naive participant last; 18 trials, 12 trials = confederates answered wrong.
What were the findings for Asch’s research into conformity?
Naive participant: 25% did not conform, 75% did; Asch effect = extent of conformity in trivial task; participant post-interview = conformed to avoid rejection (NSI).
What were Asch’s variations in research into conformity?
Group size, Unanimity, Task difficulty, Private answers.
How does group size affect the extent of conformity?
3 confederates = conformity up by 31.8%; more confederates = small difference; small majority = no conformity; large majority = no need.
How does unanimity affect the extent of conformity?
Disagreeing confederate = reduced conformity (25% average); participant could behave more independently.
How does task difficulty affect the extent of conformity?
More similar line length = conformity increased; greater ISI effect when the task is harder.
How do private answers affect the extent of conformity?
Written answers = conformity down; 2/3 = less pressure = less NSI effect.
What are the evaluation points of Asch’s research into conformity?
Perrin/Spencer = recreated on UK engineering students [396 trials = one confederate] = Asch effect not consistent; trivial task = demand characteristics = lack validity/doesn’t reflect everyday life; only tested US men = women/collectivist cultures more conforming.
What was the aim of Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment?
Whether people will conform to new social roles (situation=behavior)
What was the procedure for the Stanford Prison Experiment?
Participants=emotionally stable male Stanford Uni psych students; randomly allocated role of prisoner/guard; unexpectedly arrested at home; deindividuation (referred to by number)/spent 23 hours a day locked in cells; prison guards=uniforms, sticks, mirrored glasses; meant to last 2 weeks
What were the results from the Stanford Prison Experiment?
Stopped after 6 days; guards became brutal; day 2=prisoners rebelled, guards became harsher (harassment); prisoners became depressed/anxious; one prisoner released=psychological disorder; one prisoner on hunger strike=force fed=shunned by prisoners; guards identified closely with their role; prisoners did as told
What was the conclusion drawn from the Stanford Prison Experiment?
The situation caused participants to conform to social roles by changing their behavior
What is deindividuation?
When you become so immersed in the norms of the group you lose your sense of identity/personal responsibility
What are the evaluation points of Zimbardo’s research?
Emotionally stable/random assign=rule out personality=internal validity=confidence
What are the ethical issues of Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment?
Participants experienced psychological distress; lack of informed consent; right to withdraw was not clearly communicated
What are the ethical issues of Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment?
Informed consent: Participants volunteered/couldn’t fully consent to everything.
Deception: Informed their rights would be taken/were not told they would be arrested by surprise.
Right to withdraw: Told they could leave/prison environment made it feel impossible (respond as superintendent).
Protection from harm: Weren’t protected from psychological harm [couldn’t be predicted].
What is obedience?
Form of social influence where a person follows a direct order from an authority figure who can punish disobedience.
What was the aim of Stanley Milgram’s research?
After the events of the Holocaust, Milgram aimed to investigate whether the Germans were more obedient.
What was the procedure of Milgram’s obedience study?
40 male participants (recruited=newspaper ad/flyers); participants between 20-50 from range of jobs; paid $4.50; in Yale Uni lab; fixed draw: confederate=learner/participant=teacher; experimenter=actor in lab coat; participants told they could leave at any time; learner strapped to chair/wired with electrodes=shocked when wrong [not real]; 15-450 volts=learner no response after 315; 4 prods for teacher unsure.
What were the findings of Milgram’s obedience study?
No participants stopped below 300 volts; 12.5% stopped at 300 volts; 65% continued to highest 450 volts; qualitative data: participants showed extreme tension (sweat, tremble etc.); Prior: 14 psych students predicted no more than 3% would go to 450 volts (findings unexpected); all participants debriefed, assured behavior was normal; follow up questionnaire=84% glad to have participated.
What are the evaluation points for Milgram’s obedience study?
Didn’t believe shocks = lack internal validity.
Sheridan/King = real shocks = same behaviour.
What percentage of nurses obeyed doctor demands in Milgram’s study?
21/22 nurses obeyed demands = external validity.
What was the replication result of Le Jeu de La Mort?
80% max 460 volts = similar behaviour = support.
What is a limitation regarding participant backgrounds in Milgram’s study?
Only white male Americans (unrepresentative).
Participant backgrounds mixed/replicated in other cultures.
What are the ethical issues with Milgram’s obedience study?
Deception: Believed role allocation random/real shocks = could affect behaviour.
Necessary for internal/ecological validity; participants debriefed.
What is the issue of protection from harm in Milgram’s study?
Adequate proportions not taken; participants exposed to extreme distress.
Follow up questionnaire = 84% glad to take part.
What is the right to withdraw in Milgram’s study?
Money/products = no right to withdraw.
Made clear participants would still be paid if they didn’t continue.
How does proximity affect the extent of obedience?
Teacher/learner in same room = obedience 65% to 40%.
Touch proximity (teacher forced learners hand on electroshock plate) = 30%.
How does remote instruction affect obedience?
Remote instruction (instructions by telephone) = 20.5%.