social influence Flashcards
What are the are the different reasons for conformity
Normative social influence and informational social influence- normative social influence is conforming to be liked by peers, informational social influence is conforming to be right
what are the three types of conformity
compliance- appearing to agree with an idea to avoid rejection from the group, but in private you don’t agree
internalisation- an internal and external change in behaviour. You agree with a group both publicly and privately.
identification- occurs when someone conforms to a given social role in society
what happened in Jeanes’s- bean experiment
Asked participants to guess how many beans they thought were in a jar. they made a guess as part of a group after making a guess alone. they found that the participants would report guesses at approximately at the same value despite previous guesses that were very different.
aschs line judgement task procedure and findings
had 50 males each with 5 confederates in a group. they were asked to assess which lines were the same. the confederates gave wrong answers on 12/18 trials. 32 percent of participants conformed on these trials.
strengths and weaknesses of aschs line judgement task
lacks ecological validity because it was carried out in a lab setting and mundane realism its not a true measure of conformity in real life social situations.
has real life application as it provides evidence that people will conform even when there is a clear answer- could help explain Nazis in world war 2.
lacks population validity-
links to normative influence theory
what are the factors affecting conformity
- group size
- unanimity
- answers in private
- difficulty of task
standford prison experiment procedure
-volunteers were assigned different roles by random as a prisoner or a prison guard
- prisoners were arrested from their home were issued a uniform and a number which they were called only
guards were issued khaki, handcuffs, whistles, and dark glasses to make eye contact impossible with the prisoners.
- the guards quickly adapted to their role and acted sadistically to dominate the prisoners.
- the prisoners also adapted to their role and behaved like normal inmates.
Milgram’s shock study procedure
participants were decieved and assigned the role of a teacher while a confederate was assigned the role of a learner. They were asked to shock the confederate to aid their learning. the shocks would increase each time the confederate incorrectly answered a question. they were in seperate rooms. the experimenter would use a series of prods if the participant refused.
milgrams shock procedure findings
they found that 65 percent of participants were willing to go up to max voltage
all participants went up to 300 volts
lacks ecological validity- done in a lab and situation can’t be generalised
-deception -
- psychological harm
- not repeatable because of modern rules on studies t
- real life application- social psychology in nazis
-sample biased, only males
what is the agentic state
The agentic state is a mindset where a participant believes that they are no longer responsible for the consequences of their actions. the authority is. e.g soliders- they are just carrying out orders , see it as their duty
what are the situational factors
- the power of uniform- lab coat
- the status of the location- status dropped to 47 percent
- the proximity of authority- telephone call
dispositional explanation of authority personality
personality factors such as having a strong focus on social rank and status had a tendancy to obey authority more if they saw them as higher rank.
f- scale
adorno beleived that the cause of this personality was having strict parents which left them with hostility which they couldn’t express so seek out “weaker targets” like ethnic minorities
resistance to social influence
Individuals who have support for their point of view no longer fear being ridiculed, allowing them to avoid normative social influence. Furthermore, individuals who have support for their point of view are more likely to disobey orders.
what is locus of control
people with external loci of control believe that they don’t have control of their actions and believe that outcomes are a result of external forces. they are less likely as a result to take responsibility for their actions and more likely to obey
people with internal loci of control believe that do have control of their actions and so are more resistant to social influence.
factors affecting minority influence
consistency- diachronic- majority sticks to their views and synchronic between its members. see Moscoviccis slide study
flexibility
commitment