Memory Flashcards

1
Q

encoding in short term memory

A

acoustic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

encoding in long term memory

A

semantic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

capacity in short term memory

A

plus or minus 7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

capacity in long term

A

unlimited capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

duration long term

A

infinite

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

duration short term

A

20-30 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is a leading question

A

a leading question is a question which suggests an answer to a subject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

loftus and zanni study on the effect of words on the memory

A

loftus and zanni found that the difference between using a and the could alter the participants memory of if there was a broken headlight in the scene. a implies there’s doubt whether there’s a headlight while the implies there is one in the scene. 7 percent said there was in condition “a” 17 % said “the” said there was one in condition “the”

real life application.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

loftus and palmer study experiment 2

A

loftus and palmer showed a clip of car crash to students. they asked the participants if they had seen broken glass. using different words such as collided smashed to describe the car crash. people in the condition with the word smashed were more likely to say that there was broken glass.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

loftus and palmer study experiment 1

A

showed a clip of a car crash asked students to estimate how fast the cars were travelling using different words to describe the crash. such as collided hit, bump. higher impact words such as smashed produced the highest estimates of speed of around 40 mph while contacted scored the lowest at 31.4 mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what were loftus and palmers explanations for the results in 1

A

Response-bias factors: The misleading information provided may have simply influenced the answer a person gave (a ‘response-bias’) but didn’t actually lead to a false memory of the event. For example, the different speed estimates occur because the critical word (e.g. ‘smash’ or ‘hit’) influences or biases a person’s response.
The memory representation is altered: The critical verb changes a person’s perception of the accident - some critical words would lead someone to have a perception of the accident being more serious. This perception is then stored in a person’s memory of the event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is proactive interference

A

when previous learning interferes with the retrieval of new learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is retroactive interference

A

when new learning interferes with the retrieval of old learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

outline the working memory model

A

central executive- It is responsible for monitoring and coordinating the operation of the slave systems . little is known how it functions
episodic buffer- The episodic buffer acts as a ‘backup’ store which communicates with both long-term memory and the components of working memory.
viso-spatial pad- correlates all visual information, used for navigation
phonological loop- correlates all auditory information. 1. stores all speech perception and stores it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is a cognitive interview

A

a cognitive interview is a questioning technique used by the police to enhance retrieval of information about a crime scene for eyewitnesses and victims memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are the crucial features of cognitive interview

A

change of order
change of perspective
mental reinstatement
in-depth reporting

17
Q

geiselman et al. procedure

A

participants viewed a violent film and after 48 hours were interviewed by a police man using the following methods

18
Q

evaluation for working memory model

A

supporting evidence from dual task studies e.g robinsons chess players
kf case study
lack of clarity over central executive and episodic buffer
research evidence from brain scans that there are different parts of the brain that are anatomically different. supports role of CE in the prefrontal lobe
predictive valididty- could have real life application in education

19
Q

evaluation for multi store memory model

A

supporting evidence from lab studies
supporting evidence from real life case studies
oversimplified
confusion to how seperate both models are

20
Q

different types of validity

A

internal
external
population, concurrent,temporal predictive

21
Q

mnemonic for evaluation points

A

validity
ethics
reliability
application

22
Q

encoding specifity principle

A

Encoding specificity is a principle that states that human memories are more easily retrieved if external conditions (emotional cues) at the time of retrieval are similar to those in existence at the time the memory was stored.

23
Q

duration for sensory register

A

millisecconds

24
Q

retrieval failure due to lack of cues

A

state dependent forgetting and context dependant forgetting

Goodwin et al. (1969) investigated the effect of alcohol on state-dependent retrieval. They found that when people encoded information when drunk, they were more likely to recall it in the same state. For example, when they hid money and alcohol when drunk, they were unlikely to find them when sober. However, when they were drunk again, they often discovered the hiding place. Other studies found similar state-dependent effects when participants were given drugs such as marijuana.

Baddeley (1975) indicates the importance of setting for retrieval. Baddeley (1975) asked deep-sea divers to memorize a list of words. One group did this on the beach and the other group underwater. When they were asked to remember the words half of the beach learners remained on the beach, the rest had to recall underwater.

Half of the underwater group remained there and the others had to recall on the beach. The results show that those who had recalled in the same environment (i.e. context) which that had learned recalled 40% more words than those recalling in a different environment. This suggests that the retrieval of information is improved if it occurs in the context in which it was learned.

25
Q

study on short term duration

A

Peterson and Peterson participants fiven trigrams to remember. control backwards and to prevent rehearsal and asked to reccall after. ( 1, 3 6, 9,12 15,18 secconds)

findings- 3 seconds- 80% of trigrams were correctly recalled only 10 % were correctly recalled at 18 secconds

26
Q

case study of KF

A

kf had a motor accident. he had problems with his short term memory but not his long term memory. he could only remember 2 items at one time. They also found that KF’s short-term memory deficit was limited to verbal materials (e.g. letters, words) and did not extend to meaningful sounds (e.g. cats mewing), in other words he couldn’t remember things like words, but could remember meaningful sounds.