Social Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define Conformity

A

A change in a person’s behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagined group pressure. It is a form of majority influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define Compliance

A

When a person changes their public behaviour, the way they act, but not their private beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Identification

A

When a person changes their public behaviour and their private beliefs, but only while they are in the presence of the group. This is usually a short term change and is usually as a result of normative social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Internalisation

A

When a person changes their public behaviour and their private beliefs. This is usually a long-term change and often the result of informational social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the lowest level of conformity?

A

Compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the middle level of conformity?

A

Identification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the deepest level of conformity?

A

Internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Informational Social Influence?

A

Need to be right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Normative Social Influence?

A

The person conforms because of a need to be accepted by the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was Asch investigating?

A

The extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What sample of people did Asch test?

A

123 male American undergraduates in groups of 6; consisting of 1 true participant and 5 confederates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Briefly describe Asch’s procedure

A

Participants and confederates were presented with 4 lines; 3 comparison lines and 1 standard line

They asked to state which of three lines was the same length as a stimulus line

The real participant always answered last or second to last

Confederates would give the same incorrect answer for 12/18 trials

Asch observed how often the participant would give the same incorrect answer as the confederates versus the correct answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the findings of Asch’s study?

A

36.8% of ppts conformed
25% never conformed
75% conformed at least once

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Give the factors that affect levels of conformity

A

Group size
Unanimity
Task Difficulty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How might group size affect level of conformity? Refer to Asch’s study

A

An individual is more likely to conform when in a larger group. There was low conformity with group size of confederates were less than 3 - any more than 3 and the conformity rose by 30%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How might unanimity affect level of conformity? Refer to Asch’s study

A

An individual is more likely to conform when the group is unanimous i.e. all give the same answer. When joined by another participant who gave the correct answer in Asch’s study, conformity fell from 32% to 5.5%

17
Q

How might Task Difficulty affect level of conformity? Refer to Asch’s study

A

An individual is more likely to conform when the task is difficult. For example, Asch altered the lines making them more similar in length. Since it was harder to judge the correct answer conformity increased.
When the task is difficult, we are more uncertain of our answer so we look to others for conformation

18
Q

Give two strengths of Asch’s study

A

Lab experiment - Extraneous and cofounding variables are strictly controlled, meaning that replication of the experiment is easy

High internal validity - Strict control over EVs. The participants did the experiment before without confederates to see if they actually knew the correct answer

19
Q

Give two drawbacks of Asch’s study

A

Lacks ecological validity - it was based on peoples’ perception of lines and so the findings cannot be generalised to real life as it does not reflect the complexity of real life conformity

Ethical issues - there was deception as participants were tricked into thinking the study was about perception rather than compliance so they could not give informed consent

20
Q

What is a social role?

A

A position or status that a person holds e.g. student, daughter etc. Social roles may carry expectations about what is appropriate attributes and behaviour for the role e.g.intelligent, nurturing etc..

21
Q

What was the aim of Zimbardo’s research?

A

To investigate how readily people would conform to the roles of guard and prisoner in a role-playing exercise that stimulated prison life

22
Q

Who were the participants of Zimbardo’s research?

A

24 American male undergraduate students

23
Q

Describe the procedure of Zimbardo’s research

A

Zimbardo converted a basement of the Stanford University psychology building into a mock prison
Participants were randomly assigned to either the role of prisoner or guard
Prisoners were treated like every other criminal, being arrested without warning and were stripped naked when arriving at the prison
Guards were permitted instructed to do whatever they thought was necessary to maintain law and order in the prison. No physical violence was permitted

24
Q

Describe the findings of Zimbardo’s research

A

Identification occurred very fast, as both the prisoners and guards adopted their new roles and played their part in a short amount of time
Guards began to harass and torment prisoners in harsh and aggressive ways
Prisoners would only talk about prison issues

25
Q

Give two strengths of Zimbardo’s research

A

Real life applications - This research changed the way US prisons are run e.g. young prisoners are no longer kept with adult prisoners to prevent the bad behaviour perpetuating

Debriefing - participants were fully and completely debriefed about the aims and results of the study

26
Q

Give two weaknesses of Zimbardo’s research

A

Lacks ecological validity - The study suffered from demand characteristics. For example, the participants knew that they were participating in a study and therefore may have changed their behaviour, either to please the experimenter or in response to being observed

Ethical issues - Participants were not protected from stress, anxiety, emotional distress and embarrassment (psychological harm)

27
Q

Define Obedience

A

Type of social influence whereby one person follows the orders of another. The person giving the orders normally is an authority figure and has the power to punish

28
Q

What was Milgram’s (1963) aim?

A

To observe whether people would obey a figure of authority when told to harm another person

29
Q

Who were the participants in Milgram’s experiment?

A

Randomly selected participants - 40 US males between 20-50 years old

30
Q

Give the procedure of Milgram’s experiment (1963)

A

A participant given the role of ‘teacher’ and a confederate given the role of ‘learner’
Participant had to ask the confederate a series of questions. Whenever the confederate got the answer wrong, the participant had to give him an electric shock. The electric shock incremented by 15 volts at a time.
There were no real shocks administered.
The experimenter’s role was to give a series of orders when the participant refused to administer a shock

31
Q

Give the findings of Milgram (1963)

A

All participants went up to 300V
65% went up to 450V
No participants stopped below 300V, whilst only 12.5% stopped at 300V, showing that the vast majority of participants were prepared to give lethal electric shocks to a confederate

32
Q

Give the three factors affecting obedience

A

Proximity
Location
Uniform

33
Q

How does Proximity affect obedience? (refer to Milgram)

A

Participants obeyed more when the experimenter was in the same room i.e. 62.5%.
This was reduced to 40% when the experimenter and participant were in separate rooms

34
Q

How does Location affect obedience? (refer to Milgram)

A

Participants obeyed more when the study was conducted at a prestigious university i.e. Stanford.

35
Q

How does Uniform affect obedience? (refer to Milgram)

A

Participants obeyed more when the experimenter wore a lab coat. A person is more likely to obey someone wearing a uniform as it gives them a higher status and a greater sense of legitimacy.

36
Q

Give two strengths of Milgram (1963)

A

Debriefing - The participants were thoroughly and carefully debriefed on the real aims of the study, in an attempt to deal with the ethical breach of the guideline of protection from deception and the possibility to give conformed consent

Real life applications - This research opened our eyes to the problem of obedience and so may reduce future obedience in response to destructive authority figures

37
Q

Give two weaknesses of Milgram (1963)

A

Ethical issues: There was psychological harm inflicted upon the participants
There was deception and so informed consent could not be obtained.

It raises a socially sensitive issue - Milgram’s findings suggest that those who are responsible for killing innocent people can be excused because it is not their personality that made them do this.