Social Influence Flashcards
Jenness (1932)
Informational social influence, participants first wrote how many beans they thought were in the jar on a piece of paper. When given a chance to confer answers with other participants they all changed there answers to higher than their initial guess.
Factors effecting conformity- Asch
Supports NSI, participants conformed to confederates and said the wrong answer in a simple line matching task 1/3 of the time
Asch variations
Changing task difficulty, group size and unanimity of the majority and whether they answered allowed or in private
Conforming to social roles- Zimbardo
Created a fake prison environment at Stanford university to see if students would conform to their roles, had to end experiment early as guards were mistreating prisoners so badly
Obedience- Milgram
Supports legitimacy of authority and Agentic state- got all participants to shock up to 300V, at which point the confederate showed discomfort. 65% shocked confederate up to 450V, which they had previously been told could be lethal. This was just because of the presence of an authority figure in a lab coat
Obedience- Milgram’s variations
Supports legitimacy of authority and Agentic state, depending on variation- Changed proximity of authority and victim, the uniform of experimenter (lab coat or not) and the location of the experiment (rundown office in Bridgeport vs Yale)
Obedience- Hofling
Supports legitimacy of authority in ecologically valid environment- Real life hospital 21/22 nurses broke strict code because an unknown doctor told them over the phone
Explanations for obedience- Adorno
(1947) he created the Authoritarian personality explanation of obedience, claiming some are just more likely to obey because of their strict upbringing. The F scale was a measure of the AP characteristics
Explanations for obedience- Elms and Milgram
Supports authoritarian personality as explanation for obedience- Discovered obedient participants in the line study were likely to have a higher F score
Avtgis (aviator)
Resistance to social influence- found people with high internal locus of control were much less likely to be persuaded, influenced of to conform compared to high external LoC
Consistency minority influence- Moscovici
Found a consistent minority (8%) were significantly more influential than an inconsistent one (1%) in a colour perception test
Nemeth and Brilmayer
Role of flexible majority- jurors were more likely to be influenced by a confederate juror who was willing to compromise over the level of compensation given to the victim