social influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

describe conformity

A

a change in a person’s behaviour or opinions as a result of a real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are social norms

A

rules or expectations of a particular group or society. these can be explicit or implicit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is compliance

A

publicly conforming but privately maintaining our own views

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is identification

A

adopting a group’s views both publicly and privately usually only while the group is present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is internalisation

A

a true change of private view that is not dependant on the presence of the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the three types of conformity

A
  • compliance
  • identification
  • internalisation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

explain normative social influence

A

all about norms and what is typical behaviour. NSI is a emotional rather then a cognitive process and is a temporary change in opinions. this happens when people are scared of rejection and people want social expectance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

explain informational social influence

A

change what you think for example if you don’t know the answer in class then you copy what everyone else says the answer is. most likely to happen when there is a new person and we assume the rest of the group is right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is two strengths of the explanations for conformity

A
  • empirical evidence
  • research to support NSI
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is one weakness of the explanations for conformity

A
  • individual differences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what was the procedure for Asch vision test

A
  • 123 male Americans undergraduates
  • tested in groups of 6-8 and they all gave the same answers in a certain order with the naïve participant second to last
  • 3 lines were shown to participants
  • all but one were confederates
  • gave obvious incorrect answers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what was the findings for Asch vision test

A
  • 36.8% of responses in the 12 critical trials were incorrect which shows that they conformed to the incorrect answers
  • 25% of participants never conformed on any of the trials
  • which means that 75% of naïve participants conformed at least once
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was the conclusion of Asch vision test

A
  • when participants were interviewed afterwards most said that they conformed to avoid rejection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

weaknesses of Asch’s vision test

A
  • lacks temporal validity
  • lacks ecological validity
  • gender bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was the aim of Zimbardo’s study

A

to examine whether people would conform to the social roles of a prison guard or prisoners when placed in a mock prison environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

who took part in Zimbardo’s study

A
  • 21 male university students
  • selected those who seemed emotionally stable after testing
  • students were randomly assigned the role of either the guard or the prisoner
17
Q

what was Zimbardo’s study

A
  • set up a fake prison at Stanford Uni
  • prisoners were arrested in their homes and then strip-searched, de-loused and given a uniform
  • prisoners had 16 rules to follow which was enforced by the guards
    -guards had wooden club, handcuffs, keys and mirror shades and they had complete control over the prisoners
18
Q

issues of Zimbardo’s study

A
  • ethical issues- didn’t know they would be take from there home, were strip-searched, some of the guards were hostile and dehumanising, Zimbardo overlooked the abusive behaviour
19
Q

what did Zimbardo find

A

he found that the social pressures of the prison situation influenced the guards to behave in a certain way. An ‘evil situation’ create evil behaviour

20
Q

what was Milgram’s aim of his study

A

He wanted to assess obedience levels when a authority figure ordered the participant to give an strong shock to the learner (15-450 volts)

21
Q

what was Milgram’s baseline procedure

A
  • 40 American man volunteered to be part of the study
  • they would arrive at the lab and be introduced to another participant which was a confederate
  • ## the experimenter was dressed in a grey lab coat
22
Q

what was the findings of Milgram’s baseline procedure

A
  • every participant delivered all the shocks up to 300 volts
  • 5 participants stopped at 300 and the rest continued to 450 volts
  • Milgram collected qualitative data including observations
  • many participants showed signs of extreme tension such as sweating, stuttering, biting their lips and shaking
  • the findings for this study was unexpected
23
Q

what was the conclusion of Milgram’s baseline procedure

A
  • Milgram concluded that the German people during the war were not that different as the Americans in his study carried on if they were told to even if they were hurting someone else
  • he suspected that there were other factors that would effect or encourage obedience
24
Q

what did Milgram believe about situational variable

A

he believed that you could alter obedience levels simply by changing what he referred to as situational variables

25
Q

proximity in situational variables for obedience

A
  • when in the same room obedience drops from the baseline at 65% to 40%
  • when in touch proximity the obedience rate dropped to a further 30%
  • when given a remote instruction condition obedience dropped to 20.5% and participants tended to give lower shocks then told or pretended to give shocks
26
Q

location in situational variables for obedience

A
  • conducted a study in a run down building rather then Yale university and obedience fell to 14.5% as they felt that the experimenter had less authority
27
Q

uniform in situational variables for obedience

A
  • in the original study the experimenter wore a lab coat however once changed for someone in normal clothes the obedience rate dropped to 20%
28
Q

strengths of Milgram’s theory of situation variables

A
  • empirical support
  • cross cultural replications
29
Q

weaknesses of Milgram’s theory of situation variables

A
  • low internal validity
30
Q

what is the agentic state

A

Milgram suggested that obedience to destructive authority occurs because the person does not take responsibility as they are acting for someone else.

31
Q

what is the autonomous state

A
  • a person in this state is free to behave according to their own actions
  • the shift from autonomous to agency is called the agentic shift
32
Q

strengths of social-psychological factors

A
  • supportive research
  • use for comparison of other cultures
33
Q

weakness of social-psychological factors

A
  • limited explanation
34
Q

what is an authoritarian personality

A

someones who shows an extreme respect and submissiveness to authority and view the rest of society to be weak

35
Q

what did Adorno believe about the authoritarian personality

A

that it forms in childhood mostly as a result of harsh parenting especially when parents give conditional love. he believed that this created hostile and resentment in children but they were unable to present this so they displace it onto others who are perceived as weaker

36
Q

Adorno’s research- procedure

A

he studied more then 2000 middle-class, white Americans and their unconscious attitudes to other ethnic group. to do this they created the f-scale

37
Q
A