Social Influence Flashcards
What is conformity?
A Change in a person;s behaviour or opinion as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group
What are the types of conformity?
Kelman 1958
Compliance
Identification
Internalisation
What is compliance?
Publicly conforming to the behaviour or views of others in a group but privately maintaining one’s own views
(Just going along with it)
What is identification?
Adopting the values, attitudes or behaviour of a group both publicly and privately because you value membership with the group
(Wanting to belong)
What is internalisation?
A conversion of private views to match the group, the new attitudes become part of your own value system
(Actually agreeing)
What are the explanations for conformity?
Deutsch and Gerad
Normative social influence
Informational social influence
What is normative social influence?
Agreeing with the majority because we want to be liked and/or do not want to be rejected (leads to compliance)
What is informational social influence?
Agreeing with the majority because we believe they know better or are more likely to be right (leads to internalisation)
Jenness 1932
(Beans in a jar)
101 psychology students individually estimated how many beans were in a glass bottle and were then split into groups and asked to provide a group estimate
Nearly all participants changed their original answer, males by 256 and females by 382
Participants changes their answers because they believed the group estimate was more likely to be right, thus supporting ISI
Asch 1955
123 American men were put in groups of 6-8 and given two cards and asked to identify which line matched x
In each group there was only one genuine participant seated at the end and all confederates gave the same wrong answer
On average the genuine participant conformed 33% of the time and 25% of participants never conformed
Participants changed their answer because they wanted to fit in with the group showing NSI
What is a demand characteristic?
Caused by mundane realism and means that participants change their behaviour after becoming aware of the real purpose of the study
Perrin and Spencer 1980
They repeated Asch’s study with UK science and engineering students and only 1 participant out of 396 trials conformed (less than 0.3%). This gave Asch’s study the nickname ‘a child of its time’ but times had changed and science and engineering students may have more self efficacy
Morí and Arai (2010)
They repeated Asch’s study but with all genuine participants but each wore headsets showing the lines with one having a different answer. It was conducted with 104 Japanese undergrads
The females gave similar results to Asch with 37% conformity however the males was much lower
This partially supports Asch
Variations of Asch’s study - group size
The number of confederates were changed
There was very little conformity when the majority consisted of only one confederate, rising to 13% with two, 31.8% with three and further increases up to a majority of 15 before the number of confederates stops affecting conformity showing that the size of the majority is only important to a point
Variations of Asch’s study - unanimity of the majority
Asch introduced a confederate who disagreed with the others, sometimes giving the right answer and sometimes giving the wrong answer
Conformity reduced to 5% and 9% when the dissenting confederate gave a wrong answer
This shows that the influence of the majority depends on the group being unanimous
Variations of Asch’s study - difficulty of task
Asch made the difference between the lines much more ambiguous and the level of conformity increased
This shows that ISI played a greater role as people were unsure and looked to others for guidance
Zimbardo’s research - aim
There had been many prison riots in America and Zimbardo wanted to know why the social role of prison guards created brutal and sadistic behaviour
Zimbardo’s research - procedure
Zimbardo’s set up a mock prison in the Stanford university basement and selected 21 emotionally stable male volunteers who were randomly assigned to the role of guard or prisoner. Both groups were encouraged to conform, the guards wore uniforms, shades and were given wooden clubs and the prisoners were identified solely by their number
Zimbardo’s research - findings
The guards took on their roles with enthusiasm and treated the prisoners harshly, they constantly harassed, humiliated and degraded the prisoners with some of them seemingly enjoying it
The prisoners began to rebel after only 2 days, ripping their uniforms and swearing at the guards before beginning to show signs of depression and one going on a hunger strike
Zimbardo’s had to end the study after 6 days as opposed to the planned 14
Zimbardo’s research - conclusions
Social roles appear to have a strong influence over the behaviour of individuals, the guards became brutal and the prisoners became submissive
The roles were taken on easily by all participants
Ethical issues with Zimbardo’s research
Participants felt they couldn’t leave (right to withdraw)
Participants were not protected from harm
They were deceived, participants were not told they would be arrested from their homes
Zimbardo’s dual role as prison warden and researcher
Reicher and Haslam (2006)
BBC prison study
Was a televised remodel of the SPE in the UK. The sample consisted of 15 men and conformity was not automatic: the guards authority quickly broke down and the prisoners set up a commune.
These differences may be because it was a different time meaning that culture was different and it was televised
Abu Ghraib (2003-2004)
The US military took over an area in Iraq including a prison. They tortured, physically and sexually abused the prisoners and humiliated them. Several soldiers were eventually convicted in 2006 of war crimes.
Milgram 1963 - procedure
As a Jew Milgram wanted to assess obedience levels after the holocaust
40 American men aged 20-50 years old volunteered to take part in a paid study they were told about memory. Upon arriving each participant, the teacher was introduced to a confederate (the leaner) and another confederate (the experimenter). The leaner was put in a separate room and had to remember pairs of words. When they made an error the teacher had to give an electric shock ranging from 15V to 450V. When they reached 300V the learner began to bang on the wall before going quiet.
Milgram’s research - findings
Every participant delivered shocks up to 300V, 12.5% stopped at 300V but 65% continued to 450V
Many of the participants showed signs of tension, stress and anxiousness with 3 having seizures
Participants were debriefed and 84% said they were glad they participated
Milgram’s research - conclusion
Milgram concluded that ‘German’ people were not different as these American men were just as willing to obey orders when causing harm
Milgram’s research - evaluation
It is reliable
There may be demand characteristic
Participants were deceived and made to feel they couldn’t withdraw
Lacks mundane realism
Low internal validity
Low external validity
Variations of Milgram’s research - proximity
When the teacher and learner were in the same room the obedience rate dropped from 65% to 40%
In the touch proximity variation the teacher had to put the learner’s hand on a shock plate and obedience reduced to 30%
Decreased proximity allows the teacher to psychologically distance themselves from the learner