social influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Outline the definition of conformity

A

When an individual changes their behaviour or beliefs to fit in with those of a group, due to group pressure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 3 types of conformity outlined by Kelman?

A

-Internalisation
-Identification
-Compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline the defenition of internalisation

A

Making the beliefs, values, attitude and behaviour of the group your own
- strongest type of confirmity
-often results due to ISI
-change of view is permanent

e.g. being brought up in a religious
household, and becoming religious yourself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Outline the definition of Identification

A

-temporary change to behaviour
-belief only present in the presence of group

e.g. acting more professional and less silly when you arrive at your
office to work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Outline the defenition of compliance

A

-going along with the group’s ideas/beliefs to gain approval or avoid dissapproval
-publically agree but disagree in private
-weakest form of conformity
-likely to occur as a result of NSI

e.g. when friends pressure you into drinking alcohol when you don’t truly want to, and will not drink outside of such social situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outline the defenition for informational social influence

A

-conforming in order to be right
-look towards others by copying/obeying to have right answer in a situation when uncertain of their own knowledge
-leads to internalisation
-more likely to be permanent
-occurs in situations we do not have the knowledge or expertise to make our own decisions

e.g. a person following the direction of the crowd in an emergency, even though they don’t actually know where they are going, as they assume that everyone else is going to the right place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline research evidence for ISI

A

Fein et al. asked participants to vote for a US presidential candidate after they saw
others voting for somebody else. Most of the participants changed their mind because they
wanted to be ‘correct’, thus demonstrating the impact of informational social influence as a mechanism for conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outline the definition of NSI

A

-conforms in order to be liked
-persons need to be accepted and approved by a group
- more likely to occur through compliance
- temporary form of conformity
- often occurs to avoid embarrassment of disagreeing with majority

e.g. a person starting to smoke because they are surrounded by other people who smoke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluate a strength of NSI

A
  • real life applications
    -evidence supporting NSI and bullying
    -study has found that a boy can be manipulated by a bully into victimising other children
    -bully provides a common goal for the boy’s group of friends, where goal : victimise the other child, so the child will follow to avoid disapproval

-Asch study into conformity Supports NSI
- participants reported that they
conformed to fit in with the group, so it supports the idea of NSI :
states that people conform to fit in when privately disagreeing with the majority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline a strength of ISI

A
  • lucas et al
    -conformity to an obviously incorrect maths answer was greater when question was more difficult , when participants rated their own maths ability unfavourable
    -supports idea that individuals are more likely to turn to others when lacking information to make their own informed decision (amigious situation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluate a weakness of both ISI and NSI

A

NSI and ISI may not be completely exclusive, as suggested by Deutsch and Gerrard’s ‘Two
Process Model’. For example, a dissenting confederate can provide social support, thus reducing the effect of NSI through providing the naive participant with a supporting, similar view. Equally, this can also reduce the effect of ISI through the confederate proving the participant with an alternative source of information. This means that it may be more beneficial to look at NSI and ISI as complementary, as opposed to mutually exclusive mechanisms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What participants contributed to Asch study?

A

123 male American undergraduates in groups of 6; consisting of 1 true
participant and 5 confederates (actors/people in on the experiment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline the Aim and procedure of Asch Study?

A

Aim : To investigate conformity and majority influence

  • Participants and confederates were presented with 4 lines; 3
    comparison lines and 1 standard line
  • They asked to state which of three lines was the same length as a
    stimulus line
  • The real participant always answered last or second to last
  • Confederates would give the same incorrect answer for 12 out of 18
    trials
  • Asch observed how often the participant would give the same
    incorrect answer as the confederates versus the correct answer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Outline the findings of Asch study

A

36.8% conformed

25% never conformed

75% conformed at least once

In a control trial, only 1% of responses given by participants were
incorrect (which eliminates eyesight/perception as an extraneous
variable, thus increasing the validity of the conclusions drawn)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Outline how Size of majority/Group size effected the level of conformity

A

Point: An individual is more likely to conform when in a larger group.

Evidence: There was low conformity with group size of confederates were
less than 3 - any more than 3 and the conformity rose by 30%

Explanation: a person is more likely to conform if all members of the
group are in agreement and give the same answer, because it will
increase their confidence in correctness of the group, and decrease their
confidence in their own answer. Conformity does not seem to increase in
groups larger than four so this is considered the optimal group size.

Link: This shows that the majority must be at least 3 to exert an influence,
but an overwhelming majority is not needed in all instances to bring about
conformity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Outline how Size of majority/Group size effected the level of conformity

A

Point: An individual is more likely to conform when in a larger group.

Evidence: There was low conformity with group size of confederates were
less than 3 - any more than 3 and the conformity rose by 30%

Explanation: a person is more likely to conform if all members of the
group are in agreement and give the same answer, because it will
increase their confidence in correctness of the group, and decrease their
confidence in their own answer. Conformity does not seem to increase in
groups larger than four so this is considered the optimal group size.

Link: This shows that the majority must be at least 3 to exert an influence,
but an overwhelming majority is not needed in all instances to bring about
conformity.

17
Q

Outline how Unanimity of majority affected the rate of conformity

A

Point: An individual is more likely to conform when the group is
unanimous i.e. all give the same answer, as opposed to them all giving
different answers.

Evidence: When joined by another participant or disaffected confederate
who gave the correct answer, conformity fell from 32% to 5.5%. If different
answers are given, it falls from 32% to 9%.

Explanation: the more unanimous the group is, the more confidence the
participant will have that they are all correct, and therefore the
participant’s answer is more likely to be incorrect

Link: Unanimity is vital in establishing a consistent majority view, which is
particularly important by providing normative social influence through
preventing any conflicting views arising.

18
Q

Outline how task Difficulty affected the rate of conformity

A

Point: An individual is more likely to conform when the task is difficult

Evidence: For example, Asch altered the (comparison) lines (e.g. A, B, C)
making them more similar in length. Since it was harder to judge the
correct answer conformity increased.

Evidence: When the task is difficult, we are more uncertain of our answer
so we look to others for confirmation. The more difficult the task the
greater the conformity.

Link: This suggests that informational social influence is a major
mechanism for conformity when the situation is ambiguous and the
individual does not have enough of their own knowledge or information to
make an informed decision independently, and so has to look towards
others.

19
Q

Evaluate the strengths of Asch study into conformity

A

High internal validity - strict control over extraneous variables :
timing of assessment
type of task used.
The participants
did the experiment before without confederates : removing the confounding variable of a lack of knowledge.
valid and reliable ‘cause and effect’
relationships can be established : VALID conclusions

Lab experiment - Extraneous and confounding variables are strictly
controlled, meaning that replication of the experiment is easy. Successful
replication increases the reliability of the findings because it reduces the
likelihood that the observed findings were a ‘one-off’.

20
Q

Evaluate the weaknesses of Asch study into conformity

A