memory Flashcards
Outline “coding”
- refers to the “format” of the information which is stored in each memory store
acoustic - STM
semantic - LTM
Outline “ duration”
-length of time in which information can be stored in each memory store
18-20 seconds STM
potentially forever LTM
Outline “capacity”
-refers to the volume of information that can be stored in each memory store
7+-2 items STM
unlimited capacity LTM
Outline research for coding of STM
Baddley et al
- found that participants made the most mistakes when asked to recall acoustically similar words when asked to immediately recall the list of words
Outline research for duration of STM
Peterson et al
- participants were exposed to 3 letter trigrams , without any meaning to avoid semantic rehearsal
-counted backwards for a few seconds to avoid maintenance rehearsal
-after 18 seconds recall was less than 10%
Outline research into capaciity for STM
Jacobs et al 1887
- recall lists of numbers and letters in order
- Jacobs found that the capacity for letters was around 7 items and 9 for numbers
Miller et al
-presdisposed to this number (e.g 7 days a week)
-do this through the process of chunking : grouping letters and numbers
Outline research into duration of LTM
Bahrick et al 1975
- found that when participants were asked to recall names of students within their yearbook , recall was :
- 90%** after 15 years
-80*% for names after 48 years
Outline research into the capacity of LTM
wagnaar et al
-kept diary over course of 6 years recording 2.5k events
-tested himself on the events and found a 75% recall after one year and 45% recall after 7 years
-capacity is potentially limitless
Outline research into the coding of LTM
Baddley et al
- Recall was worst for semantically similar words when asked to recall the list 20 minutes after learning
-Difficult to recall because they were all in the same store
Outline a limitation of research into STM capacity
- methodological issues associated with jacobs et al research
- lack of standardisation and appreciation of scientific methods
-e.g current labratory studies produce highly reliable data through the controlling and removing of extraneous variables
Evaluate a strength of Bahrick et al’s research
- use of meaningful stimuli (photobooks)
-produces methology which is high in mudane realism : stimuli reflecting information which we would often to recall in our day to day lives : information with personal and meaningful value
- findings can be high ecological validity and can be generalised to real life scenarios
Evaluate a limitation of Miller and Peterson’s study
- methodology with low mudane realism
- producing findings with low ecological validity
- due to use of artificial stimuli with no personal meaning to participants : does not accurately reflect everyday learning experiences
-limits generalisability of such findings
Limitation of miller’s research into STM
- may have over- exaggerated the capacity of STM
- 1956
-capacity more similar to 4 chunks as opposed to original 5-9 limit
-This may reflect the outdated methodologies adopted by Miller and specifically, the lack of control over confounding variables which may have contributed to this inaccurate estimate.
What is the multi-store modal?
Shiffron and Atkinson
- represents how memory is stored and transferred between different stores and how it is retrieved and forgotten
- unidirectional flow : all information processed in one direction , cannot bypass a store
Outline the sensory register in the multi-store modal
- contains one substore for each 5 senses :
echoic store : auditory information
ionic store : visual information
-has a hug capacity (due to info from all 5 senses)
- duration of less than a second
-information only passes from sensory register to STM when we pay attention to it
-located frontal cortex
Outline the STM in the multi-store modal
- acoustically encoded (baddeley)
-duration of 18-30 seconds (peterson)
-capacity of 7+/-2 items (Miller)
maintenance rehearsal - occurs when we repeat information to ourselves , allowing information to be kept in STM
prolonged maintenance rehearsal- allows information to pass to the LTM
-however lack of rehearsal leads to forgetting
Outline LTM in the multi-store modal
- semantically encoded (baddeley)
-unlimited capacity
-very long duration , potentially unlimited (over 46 years as found by bahrick et al) - to remember information retrieval must occur : when information is passed back into STM and will continue to pass through the maintenance loop
what is a strength of the multi-store modal
- MSM acknowledges the qualitative differences between STM and LTM by representing them as separate stores
-for example STM is encoded acoustically , whilst LTM is coded semantically and has a much longer duration
-MSM portrays accurate view of differences between 2 memory (supported by baddeley and Miller)
Evaluate a weakness of multi-store model (tulving)
- There are different types of LTM as proposed by Tulving : procedural , semantic and episodic
-MSM does not represent this : sees LTM as a single unitary store : also does not present that some types of LTM can be retrieved unconsciously (procedural) and others consciously (semantic)
- LTM is over-simplified
not reflected in the process of info consciously transferred to STM due to process of retrieval
Evaluate a weakness of multi-store model (elaborative rehearsal )
craik and watkin 1973
— The MSM suggests that the amount of maintenance rehearsal determines the likelihood that the information will pass into the LTM, whereas a study craik and watkin 1973 suggest that it is the type of rehearsal which is more important.
They suggest that elaborative rehearsal, instead of prolonged rehearsal, is needed to transfer information from the STM into the LTM, by making links with existing knowledge.
Evaluate a weakness of multi-store model (case study )
— The MSM incorrectly represents STM as a single, unitary store.
For example, Shallice and Warrington found that their patient KF with a diagnosed clinical disorder called amnesia had poor STM recall for auditory stimuli, but increasingly accurate recall for visual stimuli.
This, alongside KF being able to differentiate and recall both verbal and non-verbal sounds, suggests that there may be multiple types of STM.
Episodic memory in LTM
-describe memories with personal meaning to us
-must be able to recall details of event such as when and where these events occurred alongside associated people
- E.G : memory of a wedding / first timee meeting a partner
-declarative
- brain scan evidence : prefrontal lobe (prefrontal cortex) and then stored across all areas of the brain : recall in hippocampus
Semantic memories in LTM
- describe memories of the world and the associated knowledge that accumulate our lives
- E.G an understanding of what words themes and concepts mean : for example it is the ability to be able to use info related to one concept to help us with another (and facts ab ourselves)
-declarative
-episodic memories become semantic over time
-no. of areas in the brain e.g perirhinal cortex
Procedural memories in LTM
- describe our memories of ‘learned skills’, such as swimming or driving.
- unconscious and non-declarative
-many parts of brain e.g cerebellum
Strength of Tulving’s LTM (peterson et al)
Petersen et al. demonstrated that semantic memories were recalled from the temporal lobe , whilst episodic memories were recalled from the right prefrontal cortex.
This supports not only the idea that there are different types of LTM, but shows that they each have a different neurological basis because they are recalled from different parts of the brain.
Strength of Tulving’s LTM (practical application)
+ There is a practical application in being able to differentiate between different types of LTM.
For example, Belleville et al notes that mild cognitive impairments most commonly affect episodic memories and so an increased understanding of episodic memory, alongside the differences between different types of LTM, may lead to improved, increasingly targeted treatments for mild cognitive impairments.
limitation of Tulvings LTM
+ cohen and squire drew a distinction between declarative and non declarative
argued episodic and semantic memories are stored together in one LTM store called declarative memory
- declarative memories must be recalleed consciously (e.g episodic and semantic)
- whilst non declarative unconsciously (procedural)
-this is different classification system used by Tulving > depiction of LTM not entirely accurate
strength of tulving LTM model (case studies)
- cases of HM and clive wearing: one type of LTM can be impaired (episodic) , other types of LTM will be unaffected (procedural and episodic)
-e.g clive wearing : skillfully play the piano (procedural) and understand concept of music (semantic)
- but unable to remember his wife visiting him 5 minutes previously (episodic) > strong support for the idea that different areas of the brain are involved in diiff types of LTM (classification of diff types of LTM as seperate)