social impact theory Flashcards
what are the three factors affecting social impact theory
social factors
psycho social law
division vs multiplication affect
what are the factors in social impact theoery
immediacy
strength
number
what factrs affect strength in social factors
age gender highrachy
describe immediacy
if the individual is very close to the person giving the order
describe the factors of strength
if individual giving orders is abouve you in strength and social status laf
if individual is alternate gender or age abouve you
describe psychosocial law
this argues that the size of the group and the influence affects obediance
what does multiplacation vs division impact argue
that the number of people in the group affects the orders given
what is a supporting evidance of social impact theory
asch
what did asch argue
in his varaiation asch changed the number of confederatesgiving inncorrect answer before pp answered. when group sized increased asch found that only 3% of individuals conformed
give another supporting evidence - milgram
milgram experiment 7
what does migrams experiment 7 support social impact theory
supports the idea of immediacy as in milgrams telephonic experiment, instructions to electrecute confederate mr wallace where given over the phone. as a result only 22.5% of pp went to 450v
t/f suggesting that the immediacy at which the instructions are given affects levels of obedience
whats a weakness of social impact theory
reductionist
how is social impact theory reductionist
theory is reductionist as it argues we are passive recivers of social impact and generalises obediance and copliance to everybody, thus underplaying the interconnections in human nature that give free will.
t/f this is a reductionist explination of obediance, as it is too simplistic and doesnt account for other aspects that may control obediance
what is anouther weakness os SIT other tahn reductionist
their are other theories explaining obedience
how is other theories explaining obediance a weakness
their are other theories explaining obediant behaviour making the SIT exlination not as strong in its explination
t/f due to other theories SIT cannot fully explain obediance