social identity theory Flashcards

1
Q

what is social identity theory?

A
  • the theory of prejudice that suggests that prejudice can result from the mere presence of another group when you yourself have membership to a different group
  • therefore, it’s not necessary for there to be competition/conflict between the groups ( as Sherif suggested in realistic conflict theory)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is social categorisation?

A

we categorise people (including ourselves) in order to understand the social environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is in-group?

A

the group we have membership to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is out-group?

A

another rival group to which we don’t have membership to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is social identification?

A

we distinguish/recognize ourselves by memberships to certain social groups and the attributes of that group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is personal identity?

A

it consists of our unique qualities , personality and personal characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

who created social identity theory?

A

Tafjel and Turner in 1979

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

why do we use social comparison?

A

we do this in order to raise the positive attributes of the in-group so that we have a positive social identity.
this then enhances our personal identity and increases our self-esteem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what 2 processes do we use to achieve social comparison?

A

in-group favouritism and negative out-group bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is in-group favouritism?

A

this is the tendency for group members to see the individuals within their group as unique and different (in-group heterogeneity bias) and in a favourable light.
e.g. ‘there are no fans in the world like Man United fans, they’re the greatest’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is negative out-group bias?

A

this is the tendency to views members of the out-group as all the same (out group-homogeneity bias) and in an unfavourable light.
e.g. ‘all liverpool fans are all idiots’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does it mean if our social identity is favourable?

A
  • if social identity is favourable, for example our football team wins several matches, then personal identity is positive. the self-esteem of the individuals within the group are higher

social identity favourable=personal identity positive=self-esteem higher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what does it mean if our social identity is negative?

A
  • if social identity is not favourable, for example our football team loses several matches, then personal identity is negative. the self-esteem of the individuals within the group are lower
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are group memberships often a source of?

A

our self-esteem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

evidence

A

the Jane Elliot study:
-A class of third grade pupils were divided over the course of a week depending on eye colour.
-During the first part of the week they were told that people with blue eyes are better, faster and have more desirable traits, while brown-eyed people are lazy and dishonest.
-Elliott then told them that she had made a mistake, and that it was the other way around, so that for the second half of the week it was reversed.
-She found that the ‘dominant group’ displayed prejudice, hostility and discrimination towards the ‘inferior group’ (even if children had previously been good friends).
-She also found that on several measures of performance the dominant group performed better academically.
it was a field experiment
-critics claim the children were too young to understand it
-Researchers later concluded that there was evidence that the students became less prejudiced after the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

shortcomings

A

these studies like tafjel are artificial and individual differences exist

16
Q

strengths

A

it explains in-group and out-group bias.
the theory explains why people prefer people who look or act like them
eg. members of elite schools might favour those belonging to their in-group when hiring for jobs

17
Q

alternative theory

A

realistic conflict theory or authoritarian personality
eg. there are gaps in the theory such as why some people cling to social identity for their self-esteem more than others. a theory of personality like Adorno’s authoritarian personality might explain this better