social explanations: crime and anti-social behaviour Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define labelling

A

A theory of how we classify ourselves and others using ‘labels’ which then defines that person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define self-fulfilling prohpecy

A

A prediction that directly or indirectly causes itself to become true, by the very existence of the prophecy itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define social learning

A

acquiring behaviours, values and attitudes by observing and imitating other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

who advocates for labelling theory ?

A

Howard Becker (1963)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was Howard Becker interested in ?

A

not how what makes a particular behaviour criminal or non-criminal, but why some actions become labelled as criminal in the first place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what does Howard Becker argue ?

A

that powerful groups in society create deviance by making up rules and applying them to people they see as ‘outsiders’ - what counts as criminal behaviour only becomes so when labelled by others. crime is a social construct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

based on labelling theory, what happens to someone who is labelled a ‘deviant’ or ‘criminal’ ?

A

their label will come to define them and will affect how society behaves towards them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

explain what would happen, in the context of being labelled a ‘criminal’, with self-fulfilling prophecy ?

A

the ‘criminal’, as labelled by society, comes to see themself in this way because of the stereotyped response of others towards their label, making deviant behaviour more likely.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

explain observational behaviour in the context of criminal behaviour

A
  • criminal behaviour is learned indirectly by observing and imitating the actions of deviant others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

contextualise how observational behaviour can lead to criminal behaviour

A
  • e.g., breaking into a car
  • the act must be attended to
  • recalled
  • would-be offender must have the skills and capacity to reproduce the behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

explain vicarious reinforcement in the context of criminal behaviour

A

if the criminal behaviour is to be imitated - it must be seen to be rewarded - such as through the acquisition of money, stolen goods etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain the role model effect in the context of criminal behaviour

A

social learning theory is a developmental explanation that can account for the development of criminal behaviour in different ages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain the effect of role models on criminal behaviour

A
  • young offenders may be especially susceptible to the influence of role models
  • more likely if the identification takes place - a young offender may look up to and want to be a gang leader for example - see them as commanding a high status and enjoying a lifestyle of wealth and luxury
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the supporting evidence for self-fulfilling prophecy ?

A

Jahoda (1954)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what took place in Jahoda (1954)

A
  • studied the Ashanti of Ghana where boys are named after the day they are born
  • Monday boys = Kwadwo (meant to be even tempered)
  • Wednesday boys = Kwadku (meant to be ‘aggressive and volatile’)
  • she observed the kwadku to be 3 times more likely to be involved in violent crime than Kwadwo, over a 5-year period
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what does Jahoda (1954) suggest ?

A

it suggests that a self-fulfilling prophecy based on cultural expectations had been formed and had influenced the boys’ behaviour

17
Q

what is the competing argument to Jahoda’s study and supporting evidence for self-fulfilling prophecy ?

A
  • study by Zebrowitz et al. (1998) found that boys with a ‘baby face’ were more likely than their mature-face peers to be delinquent and involved in crime
18
Q

what does Zebrowitz et al. (1998) suggest ?

A

it suggests that the baby faced boys were overcompensating for the perception that they may be ‘weak’ or ‘childlike’, rather than accepting and living up to the ‘baby/innocent’ label

19
Q

what is a weakness of labelling theory ?

A

it offers only a partial explanation of offending

20
Q

what does labelling theory imply and therefore suggest ?

A
  • it implies that, without labelling, crime would not exist

- therefore someone who has committed a crime, but does not have a label, is not a criminal

21
Q

why is labelling theory problematic ?

A

most people would agree that serious offences such as murder are more than social constructs, and that murderers are criminals whether they are labelled or not

22
Q

what does labelling theory’s partial explanation suggest ?

A

it would suggest that labelling theory is too simple to be a single explanation of crime

23
Q

what is another weakness of labelling theory ?

A

there is limited evidence for labelling as applied to crime

24
Q

what is the problem with the studies that have been conducted investigating labelling theory (and self-fulfilling prophecy)?

A
  • most of the studies have been confined to educational settings, such as Rosenthal and Jacobson
  • it may be that the teacher-student relationship is a very particular one in which expectations may have an important bearing on a child’s educational attainment
  • it is very hard to replicate these such studies at a societal level in the context of crime
25
Q

what is an application of labelling theory ?

A
  • it may help reduce the negative effects of labelling
  • Braithwaite (1989) - societies have lower crime rates and reoffending rates if they communicate shame about crime effectively
  • reintegrative shaming is preferable to disintegrative shaming - better when offender is helped back into society than being demonised by it
26
Q

what does the application to labelling theory suggest ?

A

it suggests that how offenders are labelled may affect how well they retake their place in society

27
Q

what does the further weakness of labelling theory mean ?

A

it means that there are too many factors that affect the relationship between labelling and crime to study the phenomenon effectively