Social, Emotional and Mental Health Needs (SEMH) Flashcards
4 Areas of Children’s SEN That Need Support (DfE Code of Practice, 2015)
- Communication and interaction
- Cognition and learning
- Social, emotional and mental health
- Sensory and/or physical needs
SEMH Needs Manifest Themselves in Many Ways Including…
- Challenging and disruptive behaviour
- Withdrawal or isolation
- Lack of concentration
- Hyperactivity
May reflect underlying MH issues e.g. ADHD, anxiety
Prevalence of Mental Health and Behavioural Problems in Schools
- 10-20% of 5-15 year olds have a mental health disorder
- Boys are more likely to be diagnosed (except anxiety and depressive disorders in girls)
Social Competence/Skills
Social competence: possessing the emotional and intellectual skills and behaviours needed to succeed as a member of society
-Social competence increases peer acceptance which is linked positively to school achievement and negatively to problems with behaviour and adjustment
Emotional Competence/Skills
Emotional competence: functional capacity wherein a human can reach their goal after an emotion eliciting encounter
- regulates negative emotions e.g. anxiety in learning
- helps with better relationships with peers and increases group acceptance
Experiences of Those With MH Disorders (Gould, Greenberg, Velting and Shaffer, 2003):
- difficulty maintaining social relationships
- less academic and vocational success
- greater risk for substance abuse
- greater risk of early mortality including suicide
Translates to broader social problems e.g. rates of mental health disorders in incarcerated youths 70%
Theoretical Approaches to Behavioural Difficulties: Behavioural Approach
- behaviour learnt through what happens in the environment
- undesirable behaviour develops because it’s associated with positive outcomes (reinforcement) and avoiding negative outcomes (punishment)
Theoretical Approaches to Behavioural Difficulties: Cognitive Approach
- focuses on cognitive processes: how events are perceived and how problems are planned and solved
- changes the way children think about themselves and the world to change behaviour
Theoretical Approaches to Behavioural Difficulties: Psychodynamic Approach
- based on the assumption that the drives, wishes etc that determine our behaviour are unconscious
- focuses on resolving internal conflict to tackle underlying problems e.g. Attachment Theory (Bowlby, 1958) - provide secure base for children with disorganised attachment style
Theoretical Approaches to Behavioural Difficulties: Systematic Approach
- holistic investigation to build a picture of behaviour, knowledge, feeling and attitudes of everyone involved in the situation (e.g. student, teacher, parent)
Theoretical Approaches to Behavioural Difficulties: Biological Level Influences
- outside the scope of teachers and educational psychologists
- collab with medical staff is necessary
- medical rather than psychological interventions
Assessing Behavioural Difficulties: Behaviourally-Based Methods
- uses systematic observation: frequency and duration of behaviour
- good for evaluating the success of an intervention BUT children may behave differently when observed
Assessing Behavioural Difficulties: Cognitively- Based Methods
- uses questionnaires to assess cognitive constructs: self-perception, attribution and personal constructs
- weakness: children tend to pick most socially desirable answer
- strength: gives the capacity for self-analysis
Assessing Behavioural Difficulties: Psychodynamically-Based Methods
- uses individual interviews or play sessions
- projective technique based on assumption that when we react to something it is a reflection of our inner world
Assessing Behavioural Difficulties: Systemically-Based Methods
- uses behavioural or cognitive assessment strategies to collect info about a problem at different levels
1. organisational level: perception of school rules and sanctions
2. individual level: views of students behaviour e.g. ask parents, teachers etc
3. social level: importance of peer groups social system in supporting or undermining behaviour