ASC Flashcards
ASC is a Neurodevelopmental Condition
- Genetic origin characterised by abnormalities in:
- social interaction and communication (inc language and NVC)
- repetitive and restricted interests and behaviour
Why is ASC on a spectrum?
- used to be 5 diagnosis of ASC but distinctions between categories were shaky so now there is a continuum
- ASC with high or low functioning specs
Pathological Demand Avoidance (PDA)
- high IQ and high functioning but deficits in social understanding and communication skills
- children diagnosed with PDA because of the way their anxiety EXPLODES over the above points
PDA Symptoms
- need to be in control, fight instructions/requests/demands of everyday life
- impulsive mood swings
- enigmatic and charming when in control
PDA describes a pattern of behaviour in response to autism-spectrum conditions
Symptoms of Severe Autism in a Child
- language absent or minimal - possible echolalia
- 30% of kids with ASC are minimally verbal when they reach school age (Tager-Flusberg, 2013)
- may ignore other people or use them as props to get things they want e.g. manipulate their hands
- insist on routine e.g. travelling the same way, eating same food etc
- meltdowns and tantrums
Symptoms of High-Functioning Autism in a Child
- Asperger (1944) described them as ‘little professors’
- may be disinterested in social contact or may be ‘active but odd’ - socially motivated but struggle to socialise appropriately and maintain relationships
- obsessive interests:
- odd things e.g. cataloguing bus tickets
- normal but unusual for age e.g. Ancient Rome
- normal for age but to an abnormal extent
- no appreciation for listener
- may lack facial expressions and vocal tones
- need for routine - need warning of changes
Genetic Origins of Autism
- concordance rates between 73-95% in MZ twins and siblings are at a substantially greater risk to develop ASC (Geschwind, 2011)
- autistic traits occur to extraordinary extent in undiagnosed relatives (Losh et al, 2009)
- but… genetic contributions to autism are complex, heterogenous and multi-factoral (Persico and Napolioni, 2013)
What does a Theory need to be to be a Good Explanation?
- universal - covers everyone on spectrum
- specific - to autism, sets people with autism apart from other conditions
- explanatory power - explains all aspects of the condition
3 Dominant Sociocognitive Models of ASC
- ToM Hypothesis
- Weak central coherence (WCC) hypothesis
- EF hypothesis
- all causal models: they identify particular symptoms and suggest those may be the cause of the autistic phenotype (rest of symptoms)
What is ToM?
- beliefs, desires, intentions used to understand why someone acts a certain way/predict how someone will act (Kloo et al, 2010)
Evidence for ToM Impairment in Autistic Children
- autistic children perform poorly on story tasks involving an understanding another’s beliefs (Baron-Cohen, 1986)
- struggle on smarties task (Perner et al, 1991)
- commit social faux pas (Happe, 1994)
- struggle recognising facial expressions (Baron-Cohen, 2001)
The suggestion is that the other autism symptoms (language and social difficulties) arise from difficulty with ToM. Autism = mind blind
Assessing ToM Thoery
- universal? no. some autistic children and adults pass ToM tasks (Tager-Flusberg, 2007)
maybe? eye tracking showed that even when answers were correct they had poor understanding of mental states (Senju, 2013) - specific? no. ToM deficits shared by deaf children and clinical populations e.g. anorexia, schozophrenia
- explanatory power? good for symptoms related to social impairment and communication/language difficulties
but.. doesn’t cover whole phenotype inc detail-focus abd repetitive behaviours (Tager-Flusberg. 2007)
Baron-Cohens (2009) ‘Empathizing - Systemizing Theory
- suggests what sets ASC apart from other disorders with impaired ToM is lower than average empathy and above average systemising
- cognitive ToM: the ability to identify/recognise another persons mental state
- affective ToM: having appropriate reaction to other peoples thoughts/feelings
splitting up components can help differentiate ASC from other conditions marked with ToM deficits
Weak Central Coherence (WCC) Hypothesis
- central coherence is the ability to process things globally and meaningfully
- poor performance in WCC paradigms e.g. Happe and Frith’s (2006) visual spatial paradigms
How Does WCC Explain ASC?
- the cognitive style of autistic people is said to explain elements of the autistic phenotype e.g. their insistence on sameness and upset at a minute change
- also explains language difficulties e.g. inability to understand irony/jokes - could be the result of being unable to consider the wider context - stuck processing the very literal words (Roland et al, 2002)
Assessing the WCC Hypothesis
- universal? no. autistic people can process wholes (faces, homographs)when prompted to process at global level (Happe and Frith, 2006)
- specific? no. weak central coherence has also been seen in other conditions e.g. eating disorders and schizophrenia
explanatory power? good job at explaining insistence on sameness and detail focus. weak at explaining social domain
Counterarguments for Criticisms of WCC?
- Happe and Frith (2006) say the WCC account isn’t claiming to fully explain ASC, rather one aspect of cognition alongside ToM
- WCC should be seen as a cognitive bias towards local processing
EF Account
- suggested that people with autism resemble patients with ‘dysexecutive syndrome’ - inflexible, perseverative cognitive style (Baddeley and Wilson, 1988)
- people with autism have trouble planning. set-shifting, inhibition and generativity
How can EF Deficits Explain ASC?
- impaired generativity - struggle to generate a new plan when routine is disrupted
- impaired mental flexibility and inhibition - problems understanding non-literal language as cannot switch between literal and non-literal meanings (Mashal and Kasirer, 2011)
- possible that EF deficits could explain failure in ToM - unable to disengage what you know is in the box (perseverating) and switch to the other persons perspective (Ozonoff et al, 1991)
Assessing EF Account if ASC
- universal? no. autistic people don’t fail all EF tasks (Hill, 2004). they often pass (Pellicano et al, 2006)
- specific? least specific of all 3 theories, if ASC was simply due to EF deficits then we would see autistic symptoms in all brain damaged patients with dysexecutive syndrome and clinical groups e.g. OCD, ADHD
Issues with Trying to Explain Autism Causally
- autistic people do have problems with ToM and EF, and do show WCC but it doesn’t mean all these problems are causal. ToM, EF and language are closely intertwined so it is hard to establish causal primacy of problems
Integration
Child with ASC placed in mainstream school with no extra support - expected to adapt to curriculum and class environment