Social composition of the HoC Flashcards
Who dominated the HoC in 1780?
Wealthy landowners / aristocrats
What proportion of MPs were sons or brothers of peers (members of the HoL)?
1/5
How was aristocratic dominance sustained through the 1780s-90s?
By William Pitt’s widespread creation of new peers.
What evidence is there of non-aristocratic influence in the HoC in 1780?
110 MPs were wealthy merchants, bankers and industrialists. A handful were born into poverty e.g. Joseph Pitt who was born a carpenter and made his own fortune.
What proportion of MPs are connected to the gentry / aristocracy after 1832?
70%
What happened to county seats after 1832?
They increased by 64.
How many seats were controlled by landowners in 1832?
70
What proportion of MPs were landowners in 1832?
75%
In 1833 how many MPs were sons of peers / baronets?
217
In 1865 how many MPs were sons of peers / baronets?
180
Which clause helped to preserve the dominance of landowners in the HoC?
The Chandos Clause
What did the 1858 Property Qualification Act do?
Removed the restriction that MPs had to have property worth £600 in counties and £300 in boroughs.
What did the 1858 act allow for in theory?
In theory it opened up the HoC to anyone who could vote. Ownership of property was no longer a key requirement of right to vote or stand in parliament.
What did trade unions begin to do from the 1870s?
Began to subsidise a handful of MPs - but this had little impact on social composition.
How was 1858 meaningless?
Still no salaries for MPs meaning anyone who wasn’t a wealthy aristocrat could not stand for election.