Social class differences in achievement Flashcards
What are internal factors affecting achievement? [4]
- labelling
- streaming
- self fulfilling prophecy
- pupil subculture
What is labelling? (internal factor)
- when a teacher attaches certain stereotypes towards a student and acts as if it is true
What are the negatives of labelling? [2]
- can result in self fulfilling prophecy
- students may start living up to the expectations of their label which can have lasting impact on students’ achievement and progress
How can labelling lead to self fulfilling prophecy?
- student may grow to dislike the teacher and therefore stop trying / be less motivated in their lessons or the subject as a whole
What did Howard Becker say about labelling?
- interviewed 60 high school teachers and asked them to judge pupils, he found that they would treat pupils better if they were in fitting with the ‘ideal pupil’
What would be considered the ‘ideal pupil’ in labelling? [3]
- work completed at a high quality and on time
- contributing in lessons and concentrating
- wearing the correct uniform and having the appropriate attire for learning
What are the strengths of Becker’s research? [1]
- bases his idea of the ideal pupil on real qualitative evidence
What are the limitations of Becker’s research? [2]
- only conducted research in one area on a small sample of teachers so cannot be generalised
- interview bias
What is the self fulfilling prophecy? (internal factor)
- when the label of a student becomes a part of the person’s identity and the label becomes true
What are the steps of self fulfilling prophecy? [3]
- the pupil is labelled negatively and is treated differently as a result
- the pupil internalises that label and starts to believe it themself
- the self fulfilling prophecy occurs and the pupil goes on to become that label
What did Rosenthal and Jacobson say about the self fulfilling prophecy? (internal factor)
- ‘pygmalion effect’
- they told the school that they had a new test specialty for pointing out ‘special’ and more intelligent people but it was just an IQ test.
- they picked 20% of the pupils at random and said that these were ‘spurters’
- They found that teachers believed the test was real and agreed with results.
- 47% of the random selection a year later had actually improved.
What are the strengths of Rosenthal and Jacobsons research? [1]
- labelling theory gives us a critical way of analysing how teacher-pupil relationships may play a part in educational achievement
What are the limitations of Rosenthal and Jacobsons research? [2]
- it is deterministic to assume that once labelling that self fulfilling prophecy will occur as pupils have free will and can choose to reject labels
- labelling theory paints teachers in a very negative light and we can argue that teachers are able to be professional and avoids biases
What is streaming? (internal factor)
- separating pupils into different ability groups or classes called ‘streams’ who are taught separately from others in all subjects
What are the disadvantages of streaming? [2]
- pupils in lower streams may become less motivated to learn as they believe they cannot change their position
- ignores the positives of streaming (eg it allows pupils to be given work which best suits their ability, giving work which is too hard for them may be demotivating and lead to under achievement)
What are the advantages of steaming? [1]
- pupils in the lower set who struggle more when learning will receive more personal and beneficial teaching at a slower pace
What did Gillborn and Youdel say about the three groups forming the ‘educational triage’? (internal factor)
- high ability —> likely to achieve good grades without support
- middle ability (potential) —> likely to achieve with teacher support
- low ability (no hopers) —> likely to underachieve as no support from teachers
In what way does streaming have different affects on pupils’ attitudes towards education? [1]
- the ‘ideal pupil’ more likely to be placed in higher sets and develop a pro school attitude
WHEREAS those negatively labelled and placed in low streams experienced the self fulfilling prophecy and underachieved
What are pupil subcultures? (internal factor)
- a group of people who’s values and behaviours differ from the dominant culture they are part of (usually referred to the counterculture)
How do pupil subcultures emerge according to theorists?
- as a response to labelling and as a reaction to streaming
What did Lacey say about the development of pupil subcultures?
- lacey studied a boys grammar school and found that streaming led to polarising boys into two subcultures, pro-school and anti-school
What is Lacy’s anti school and pro school subculture? (internal factor)
- anti school: pupils placed in low ability streams, usually working class pupils, labelled as failure so look for alternative ways of gaining status and approval from peers by inverting school values
- pro school: pupils places in high ability streams, usually middle class pupils, approved by teachers so status gained through academic success
What did Lacy say about differentiation and polarisation?
- differentiation leads to polarisation
What is differentiation? (internal factor)
- the process of teachers streaming / categorising pupils according to their perceived ability, attitude or behaviour
- more able students are given superior status
What is polarisation? (internal factor)
- the process in which pupils respond to streaming by moving towards one of two extremes; pro school and anti school subcultures
What is ingratiation according to Woods? (internal factor)
- being the ‘teachers pet’
What is ritualism according to Woods? (internal factor)
- going through motions, staying out of trouble
What is retreatism according to Woods? (internal factor)
- daydreaming and messing about
What is rebellion according to Woods? (internal factor)
- outright rejection of everything that school stands for
What are the strengths of subcultures? [1]
- there is plenty of research to support ideas around subcultures (eg Woods, Lacey and Ball)
What are the limitations of subcultures? [1] (internal factor)
- labelling theorists ignore that external factors may also contribute to the formation of working class or anti school subcultures (eg collective values such as fatalism, immediate gratification sugarman)
What was Archers research of social class differences in achievement?
- archer examined the interaction between working class pupils’s identities and how these affect their school achievement
- (habitus, symbolic capital, nike identities, wc identity and class identity)
What was Archers concept of habitus? (internal factor)
- habitus is ways of thinking and behaving, and what is considered normal: shaped by social class
- middle class = habitus seen as superior, imposes it on education system
- schools put more values on MC habitus
- WC pupils become regarded as inferior and thus disadvantaged
What was Archers concept of symbolic capital and violence? (internal factor)
- pupils socialised into MC habitus at home gain ‘symbolic capital’: status and recognition from school as more valued than WC habitus
- schools devaluing working class habitus = “symbolic violence” which keeps the lower classes “in their place”
- leads to alienation of working class pupils
- for example, archer found WC pupils felt that they needed to change the way they presented themselves in order to be educationally successful, losing their own identities in the process
What was Archers concept of nike identities? (internal factor)
- symbolic violence leads to seeking alternative ways of creating self- worth, status and value, especially through branded clothing such as nike
- styles are usually “policed” by peers and the right appearance brings “symbolic capital”, approval from peer groups and safety from bullying
- however, adopting identities through clothing brands and appearances clashes with school dress codes, leads to labelling from teachers (e.g. street style = rebellious)
- further education (college, uni, etc) not seen as realistic or desirable for “people like us” leading to self- exclusion