Social Class and Stratification Flashcards

1
Q

Define Social Stratification

A

The ranking of people and the rewards they receive based on objective criteria, often including wealth, power and/or prestige.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define Social Class

A

Structural inequalities between different people:

  • Outcome of modernity
  • (arguably) more mobile or fluid compared with other stratification systems
  • Impersonal: inequalities are in relation to structures or systems
  • Durability to those inequalities, e.g. differences according to race, gender, economic status, occupation
  • Location in the strata largely beyond individual choice or agency
  • Categories continue to exist even when individuals move out of them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Social Mobility

A

Movement up or down the hierarchy of inequality.

Some contemporary theories of social mobility emphasise achievement while others emphasize inheritance (of both privilege and disadvantage)

‘The Fair Go’ Narrative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Structural mobility

A

Macro-level: occupational structure of a nation changes, for example, agriculture -> manufacturing -> service economy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Circulation mobility

A

Micro-level: explain the movement of individuals who have a group identity in society between different social strata. For example, the social mobility of a person from a working-class background, to a semi-middle class social status

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are Marx’s beliefs, mode of production and ideology?

A

Assumed a progressive development trajectory of societies.
Positivist belief that the laws of this development can be discovered.
Theorised progress as the outcome of conflict and struggle between classes.

Mode of production: economic basis of society (i.e. means of production, technological knowledge and social relationships)

Ideology: superstructure (i.e. all non-economic aspects of society, such as politics and culture)

Class is defined by one’s relationship to the means of production:
‘Haves’ (i.e. capitalists = bourgeoisie) and ‘have nots’ (i.e. workers = proletariat)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is are the changes which are predicted to occur with Marxism?

A

Historical/dialectical materialism:

False consciousness -> problem of surplus value (i.e. profit) and exploitation

Class consciousness -> collective organisation and opposition to the ruling class

Class struggle and revolution -> socialism -> communism (i.e. classless society)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are some criticisms of Marx’s theory of capitalism?

A

History does not progress in a linear fashion towards an ‘endpoint’

Economic determinism

Industrial societies did not polarise – middle class gained in significance

Workers organised/improved their conditions, no revolution

State interventions to address imbalances in welfare states and redistribution

Where Marxism was adapted, new ruling elites emerged

Resilience of capitalism (Absorbing conflict)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were Weber’s beliefs?

A

Assumed social hierarchy and division as a result of multiple dimensions.
Believed power is the underlying source of all inequality.
Theorised social class as emergent from the market.

Class: economic factors such as wealth, income but also occupation -> objective/horizontal structure of power

Status: social honour (i.e. ancestry, family, lifestyle)  subjective meaning/vertical structure of power

Party: political organisation and influence  collective pursuit of interests

Life chances = combined outcome of economic resources and status Property ownership, skills and credentials matter -> more scope for social mobility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were Durkheim’s beliefs?

A

Assumed human beings as intrinsically anti-social.
Positivist belief in social development as result of specialisation and differentiation.
Theorized what keeps societies together (‘social solidarity’).

Organic solidarity: modern societies with high levels of social diversity

Meritocracy: equality of opportunity  hierarchy necessary and inevitable

Dysfunctional inequality: Social conflict arises when hierarchies are not transparent or not seen as based on merit

Socialisation into a moral order of mutual dependence as the key to social cohesion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were Durkheim’s functions of inequality?

A

Stratification directs individuals into social positions that reflect their talents, abilities and credentials (i.e. meritocratic)

Hierarchy of rewards incentivises individuals to invest in their skills (i.e. specialisation and occupational differentiation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are criticisms of Durkheim’s functions of inequality?

A

Neglects role of inherited privileges

Ignores non-economic rewards for responsibility (i.e. autonomy)

Does not account for how social positions become valued

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were Bourdieu’s beliefs (Neoclassical)?

A
Assumed distinctions within upper, middle and lower classes.
Believed that class is articulated in cultural tastes and lifestyles.
Theorised four types of capital.

Economic capital: material resources (i.e. wealth, income, property)

Cultural capital: cultural knowledge, educational credentials

Social capital: social connections, networks, patronage

Symbolic capital: symbolic legitimation, respect, reputation

Class is an objective position in social space (‘the field’) determined by economic, symbolic, cultural and social capital.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are criticisms of Bourdieu’s functions of inequality?

A

Cultural tastes and preferences shape every aspect social relationships and thus locate us in a social order.

Habitus: a set of dispositions that social agents calculate in response to a set of objective conditions (a ‘feel for the game’).

Symbolic violence: when a social agent uses symbolic capital to curtail the actions of another social agent with less symbolic capital.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are criticisms of Bourdieu’s functions of distinction?

A

Empirical work casts doubt on the close relationship of economic position and taste practices

Political beliefs likewise structured along social bases but not reducible to class.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain critiques of Structure vs Agency perspective and how changes are accounted for?

A

Arrangements appear fixed and individuals without agency.
Overdetermination of material and economic conditions.

Social mobility of individuals.
Institutional change over time.

17
Q

What are the relationships between Structure and Agency with Marx, Weber, Durkheim and Bourdieu?

A

Marx and Weber usually located within structural perspectives and theories that emphasize conflict.

Durkheim is associated with structural functionalism.

Bourdieu is often seen as continuing Marx’s work on class but with a stronger focus on practices, locating his theory between structure and agency.

Post-modern perspectives: boundaries between social groups blurred and permeable with a shift from production to consumption

18
Q

What are the 6 social classes/stratifications by Sheppard & Biddle (2017)?

A
Precariat
Ageing workers
New workers
Established middle class	
Emerging affluent	
Established affluent
19
Q

What occurs with poverty and social exclusion?

A

Multidimensional outcomes and causes (e.g. health, isolation).
Relative vs absolute poverty.

Social exclusion drives the reproduction of (dis)advantage to persist and deepen over time and generations and is measured as:

  • Lack of social interaction
  • Domestic deprivation
  • Extreme consumption hardship

Related to the idea of citizenship in democracies (Marshall 1950): from membership within a group arise rights and obligations:

  • Political citizenship (i.e. participate in political decision-making)
  • Civic citizenship (i.e. freedom to vote, of speech and assembly)
  • Social citizenship (i.e. access to the way of life that is seen as the norm in the community)