social change Flashcards
1
Q
social change
A
- when whole societies rather than just an individual , adopt new attitudes , beliefs & behaviours
- e.g suffragettes
- caused by social influence processes such as:
- minority influence
- conformity
- obedience
2
Q
minorities & social change: African American Civil Rights Movement (1950s)
A
- draw attention: marches drew attention to segregation (exclusive restaurants for black people )
- consistency: remained consistent with ideas during protest marches
- deeper processing: people started to think about the unjust system
- augmentation principle: black people commited risky acts that caused a lot of them to be punished
- snowball effect: actvists (MLK) drew attention of the goverment gradually which lead to the Civil Rights Act 1964 that prohibited discrimination
- social cryptomnesia: people know that change occurred but not how it happened
3
Q
minorities & social change: Suffragettes
A
- draw attention: people like Emily Davidson commited acts that drew attention to their cause of granting women the right to vote
- consistency: remained consistent with ideas as they kept doing acts such as going on hunger strikes
- deeper processing: people started to think about the unjust system
- augmentation principle: chained themselves to railings to get message across
- snowball effect: goverment eventually gave women the right to vote and own property under The Representation of the People Act 1918
- social cryptomnesia: people know that change occurred but not how it happened
4
Q
conformity & social changes
A
- influence of dissenters: could snowball
- normative social influence: saying what others are doing to fit in with others
- informational social influence: wanting to do the right thing
5
Q
obedience & social change
A
- gradual commitment: once a small instruction is obeyed it becomes more difficult to resist a bigger one
- people drift into a new kind of behaviour (recycling)
- legitimacy of authority: giving orders
- agentic state: act on the orders of other
6
Q
AO3: research support for normative influences
A
- Nolan et al (2008): investigated whether social influence processes led to environmental improvements in a community(reduction of energy consumption)
- hung messages on people’s doors that said residents in the area were trying to reduce their energy usage
- control: message didn’t say anything about others reducing their energy
- significant decrease in energy usage in the 1st group
- shows that social change does happen through normative social influence
7
Q
AO3: some studies show that behaviour can’t be changed by exposing people to social norms
A
- Foxcroft et al (2015): review of 70 studies where social norms approach was used to reduce student alcohol consumption
- only a small reduction in drinking quantity & no reduction on drinking frequency
- normative social influence doesn’t always lead to social change
8
Q
AO3: role of deeper processing
A
- Moscovici suggests that minority & majority influence have different cognitive processes : minority influence causes people to think more deeply
- Mackie: disagrees and say that majority influence creates deeper processing
- because we like to belive that others share our views & think the same way as us
when we find that the - majority thinks something different to us we are forced to think hard about their arguement
- challenges Moscovici’s theory that minority influences involves deeper processing
9
Q
AO3: barriers to social change
A
- Bashir et al (2013): believed that people can still resist change
- looked at why people resist social change even when they agree it is needed
- found that ppts were less likely to behave in an environmentally friendly way because they didn’t want to be labelled as stereotypical ‘environmentalists’
- suggests that minorities therefore have to avoid reinforcing stereotypes if they want to cause a social change
10
Q
AO3: methodological issues
A
- explanations of how social influence lead to social change use studies like Asch,Milgram & Moscovici
- they all use artificial tasks that don’t reflect real life
raises doubt about the validity of the explanations of how social change occurs