Social Categories: Race & Gender Flashcards
Individuals have a variety of social identities
- Family relationships
- Gender identity
- Many, many “group” identities - and they can overlap!
- What counts as a “group” varies across cultures, and across history
Ex: Race, Ethnicity, Culture, Religion, School, Sports Team, Hobbies/Clubs, And more!
Social Categorization
The study of how humans form “groups” based on social identities
Want to understand: The development of social categorization and childhood
Race-Based Categorization
- Begins early
Study:
Method: show 3-month-olds pairs of faces
Measure: preferential looking (which face do infants look at longer?)
Results:
infants (white, black, and Asian) look more at their own-race faces
Race-Based Preferences
Explicit preference: show white infants/children two people and ask: “Who do you like?”
Own-race preference in childhood (not infancy)
Explicit vs. Implicit Preferences
- Explicit: ask directly (“Who do you like?”)
- Implicit: ask indirectly via specifically designed tasks
Implicit Association Test
Things that are associated (that “go together”) are easier to process together:
Is it easier to categorize “group A” with “good” or is it easier to categorize “group A” with bad?
Explicit vs. Implicit Preferences for Race Results
- Explicit preferences for our own race decline with age
- Adults show no explicit bias
- Children associate their own race with “good” by 6 years of age
- Implicit bias is stable across age
Summary: White Participants’ Preferences
- Explicit: by around kindergarten, white children are willing to say they prefer white friends
- Implicit: also around kindergarten, white children show a learned association between White/good and Black/bad
- Although White older children and adults are unlikely to explicitly say that they like White people more, they show the same implicit bias (White/good and Black/bad)
Asymmetry in Race Preferences
Black children in the U.S. show lower levels of both explicit and implicit race preferences than White children in the U.S.
Children’s Early Race Preferences
- More complicated than just liking people who are “like me”!
- Three big ideas about what impacts category-based bias:
1. Contact: quantity and quality of outgroup exposure
2. Status: hierarchy of social groups within society
3. Language: how groups are talked about
The Contact Hypothesis
Main ideas:
- We like people (and things) we have regular contact with (familiar/comfortable)
- Increasing contact with “outgroup” members can attenuate social group conflict
The “Mere Exposure” Effect in Infancy
Test: preferential looking in 3-month-old infants
- 3 groups of infant participants:
White Israelis in Israel
Black Ethiopians in Ethiopia
Black Ethiopians in Israel
Results:
- White Israeli infants looked longer at White faces
- Black Ethiopian infants in Ethiopia looked longer at Black faces
- Black Ethiopian infants in Israel did not show a preference!
Ambiguous Situation Task - Contact in Schools
Study:
- The race of characters switched across trials
- Interpretation - Was she doing something good or bad?
Results:
White children’s responses - 1st and 4th graders
- Homogeneous schools (90% white): Black = more negative interpretations
- Heterogeneous schools: (<70% white): no effect of race
Contact in Communities
Study:
- Comparison of two communities: Hawaii & Massachusets, Children aged 4-11 years
- Stereotyping Task: Measures whether children hold racial stereotypes
- Essentialism Task: Measures how important
children think race is to an individual’s being
Results:
- Children in Massachusetts (MA), but not Hawaii (HI), increased racial stereotyping with age
- Children in HI essentialized race less than children in MA with age
Status: Hierarchy of Racial Groups
Black children less likely to show implicit or explicit race preferences
Study: Testing Latino/a children in the U.S.
- Compare preferences with two different comparison groups
Latino/a vs. Black
Latino/a vs. White
There is a preference for white
Study: Chinese children in China
Preferences with two different comparison groups
Chinese vs. Black
Chinese vs. White
There is a preference for white
Results:
As individuals age, they are more likely to pick up status hierarchies
Language: Communicating Social Relevance
- Some groups are more socially relevant than others
- Social distinctions that adults find important are communicated/transmitted to children
Hypothesis:
- Make a group seem important, people will care about it
- Arbitrary or “minimal” groups