Social Behaviour: Module 4 Flashcards
what are some possible explanations as to why species may tend to come together in groups?
-the habitat that is right for them, may have limiting resource needs, so individuals may tend to benefit from cluster living
-there could be fitness benefits to group living (ex. better protected, larger groups has more eyes, more sensory organs, detect predators, defend against predators)
what is fitness the product of?
survival and reproductive success
who is the actor in a group? who is the recipient in a group?
-actor: the individual that initiates the behaviour
-Recipient: the individual that the behaviour is directed at
define co-operation.
-when initiating a behaviour that both the actor and recipient benefit
- strongly favoured by natural selection (increases individual fitness)
what is selfish behaviour?
-actor benefits, recipient is harmed in terms of reduced fitness
-favoured by natural selection
what type of behaviour is it when an individual bird were to aggressively displace another bird from a patch of food?
selfish behaviour
what is altruistic behaviour?
-actor reduces its own fitness, but benefits the fitness of the recipient
-think of “selfless behaviour”
-can be understood by slightly redefining fitness
what is spiteful behaviour?
-actor and recipient suffer reduced fitness
-very difficult to evolve
-selected against: doesn’t help them, but raises the relative fitness of all of the other individuals in the population
what is a behaviour that is frequency dependent?
-depend upon frequency of individuals exhibiting that and other behaviours
-can be understood through game theory
what is game theory? define the aggressive vs submissive domination tactic. what is the hawk? what is the dove? explain
-game theory: investigates the outcomes of multi-individual interactions
-agressive: hawk strategy
-submissive: dove strategy
-resource competing for: V
-Cost of fighting over a resource: C (in terms of reduced fitness cost)
-hawk vs dove: hawk beats the dove, hawk gets all of the resources, dove nothing, hawk (wins V fitness units) dove gets zero fitness pay off
-dove vs dove: share the resource (V/2)
-hawk vs hawk: one gets the resource, one suffers the cost of fighting (average pay off: (V-C)/2)
-fitness depends on the frequency of hawks and doves in the population
-since the hawk strategy always results in higher fitness, there should only be hawks in the population, but the cost of fighting for the resource is slightly higher than the value of resource (so there should be less hawks so less cost)
-when hawk become more common, the fitness of doves is higher than of hawks
-but for doves to exist, the cost of fighting must be higher than the value of the resource
-social behaviour natural selection will sometimes depend upon the frequencies of individuals exhibiting contrasting behavioura
why would a parent sacrificing for their offspring maximize the fitness of the parent?
because it would maximize the repersentation of their genes in the population
what does hamilton’s rule explain?
altruistic behaviour could evolve through an extension of natural selection called kin selection
how can individual fitness be estimated?
number of survivng offspring an individual leaves to future generations, but individuals also have a genetic share in the offspring of their relativese
what is inclusive fitness?
-the total fitness of an individual is related to its individual fitness as well as the fitness of its relative
-the total effect an individual has of carrying on its genes by reproducing and providing aid that enables other close offspring, who share many of the same genes, to produce offspring
how would a gene that causes altruistic behaviour spread?
if it increased the fitness of related individuals that also carry the same gene