Social Area Assumptions 1- Milgram/Bocchairo Flashcards
Summaries of both studies and social area
Social area principles and assumptions
-The social area looks at understanding human behaviour in a social context, looking at the factors that lead us to behave in a given way due to the presence of others.
-Social psychologists state that our behaviour is influenced by the actual, imagined or implied presence of others.
Milgram background
-Based off of the ‘Germans are different’ theory, from WWII, proving that the Germans were so brutal because of their obedience, not because they wanted to.
-Milgram’s theory of the agentic state, in the presence of an authority figure, and the authoritative state, which we enter when there’s no authority figure.
Milgram’s aim
To investigate the level of obedience participants would show obedience to an authority figure who told them to administer electric shocks to an innocent person
Milgram’s sample
40 males (aged 20-50) all from New Haven and middle class workers.
Milgram’s results
100% of p’s- 300V
26/50- 450V
-Participants were sweating, trembling, stuttering and groaning.
-Comments made ‘I can’t go on with this’.
Milgram’s conclusion
-An important factor influencing behaviour is the situation they’re in.
-A professional-looking authority figure will also make people obey as they’re afraid of the consequences of disobeying.
Milgram’s connection to the key theme
WWHF
-Link to the key theme of responses to authority
Milgram’s connection to the key area
-State the principles and key assumptions of Social Psychology.
-Link the finding to Social Psychology, using x2 buzz words.
Bocchiaro Background
-Looked at Milgram’s response and wanted to look at how people disobey as well as whistle-blow.
Bocchiaro Aim
-To investigate the rates of obedience, disobedience, and whistle-blowing, where it was clear the instructions were ethically wrong.
-To investigate the accuracy of people’s estimates of obedience, disobedience, and whistle-blowing.
-To investigate the dispositional factors in obedience, disobedience, and whistle-blowing.
Bocchiaro Sample
Pilot study (92 students, 8 pilot studies), main experiment (149 undergraduates, 11 removed)
Results
-76.5% obeyed
-14.1% disobeyed
-9.4% whistle-blew
-Religious people were more likely to whistle-blow than non religious people
Conclusion
-Behaving morally is difficult for individuals even when this path is the easiest to take.
Can be caused by an authority figure.
-Disobedience and whistleblowing are psychologically, socially and economically demanding
Bocchiaro relation to the key theme
-WWHF
-Connection to the key response of DB OB and WB to authority figures.