Social and Professional Issues 5 Flashcards
rightness depends on consequences
Consequentialism
rightness depends at least in part on a formal moral rule or principle
Deontology
- There are no objective moral truths – only an individual’s feelings or preferences;
- “What I feel is right is right. What I feel is wrong is wrong.”
Ethical Subjectivism
Criticisms about Ethical Subjectivism
- only exercise of power
- harm others it if feels right to them
- arbitration is possible
All (not some) moral values are nothing more than cultural customs and laws
Cultural Relativism
Criticisms about Cultural Relativism
- Naturalist Fallacy
- no distinguishing difference between reformers and criminals
- can’t explain moral progress
- suspicion/mistrust to other cultures
- not for pluralistic cultures
- blind conformity
Doing the —— is doing what you are morally obligated to do (not doing bad)
moral minimum
going beyond your obligations
Doing good
Following the law is not the same thing as acting morally
- Laws can be immoral
- Laws can provide insufficient direction
- Laws can be ambiguous
Kohlberg’s stages of moral development
- Blind egoism
- Instrumental egoism
- social relationship perspective
- social system perspective
- contractual perspective
- mutual respect and universal perspective
everyone ought to do what is in his or her own rational self-interest
Ethical Egoism
Criticisms about Ethical Egoism
- Justifies any self-interested action
- Selfishness is usually associated with immorality, altruism with morality
Utilitarianism
- Jeremy Bentham (1748 – 1831)
- The morally right act for an agent A at a time t is that act available to A at t, that will maximize the total amount of good in the world (that will have the best consequences).
- “The greatest good for the greatest number”
Hedonistic Utilitarianism
- Pleasure and the absence of pain are good
- Pleasure is any sensation you would rather have than no sensation at all; and pain is any sensation you’d rather not have than no sensation at all.
Advantages of Utilitarianism
- Neautralistic
- Realistic
- Non-metaphysical
- Non-elitist
- Determinate in principle
treats everyone in the same way
Neutralistic
it’s based on real psychology. It works with people as it finds them and organizes society so that they being that way actually has good consequences for everyone.
Realistic
it doesn’t make goodness/badness right/wrongness some sort of weird qualities. What in the world is “a natural right?”
Non-metaphysical
it counts all sentient creatures. And all types of pleasures equally
Non-elitist
in principle, you can use the hedonic calculus to get an actual answer to the question of “what should I do in this case?”.
Determinate in principle
The Hedonic Calculus
- Determine Intensity x duration
- Determine Probability
- Calculate Total = (intensity x duration) x Probability