Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

1 - Social and Developmental > Social > Flashcards

Social Flashcards

1
Q

What is social psychology?

A

Taking cognition and putting it in its social context
- Scientific study of the reciprocal influence of the individual and their social context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the social aetiology of cognition?

A

Social learning theory, social roles theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the social approach to methodology?

A

Discourse analysis, thematic analysis, setting cognition in context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why is social psychology important?

A

People do not exist in a vacuum - cognition occurs in a natural context surrounded by people
Our most important functions are social - understanding humans as a species
The way people perceive their social groups - leading to discrimination (our psychological biases have real world consequences)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How is social psychology investigated? (4 methods)

A

1) Lab experiment
e.g. Milgram’s obedience studies
2) Observations
e.g. Lycett and Dunbar - male use of phones to show off/ status
3) Questionnaires
- More participants, but more likely to be biased
4) Interviews and focus groups
e.g. Campbell’s female aggression research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are quantitative methods in social psychology research?

A

Experimental research - manipulate element of a situation and observe change in outcome
Correlational research - assesses the linear relationship between two continuous variables (does not equal causation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are qualitative methods in social psychology research?

A

Sources of data: interviews, archive reports and text, observations
Analytical methods:
Thematic analysis - pull out core themes in data
Discourse analysis - analysing communication of information between people
Grounded theory - let data create the themes, cluster statements into similar categories to create hierarchical structure of concepts in data
Quantitative compromise: content analysis - prespecify important themes, go through data and count every time something comes up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is social learning theory?

A

Empiricist
Our behaviour is shaped by the social environment in which we have grown up and in which we operate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is constructivism?

A

Qualitative
Important concepts that shape how we think are constructed in the social world and we internalise this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the standard social science model (blank slate)?

A

Not even Skinner thinks we are born as blank slates, nevertheless our social environment still shapes us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are cognitive constraints and models?

A

Social behaviour driven by cognitive processing factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is evolutionary social psychology?

A

Looking at specific behaviours that enhance reproductive success and genetic underpinnings of behaviour are subsequently passed on to future generations
- Random variation
- Natural and sexual selection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are criticisms of evolutionary social psychology?

A

Levels of explanation - proximate perspective (literal neural mechanism), ultimate perspective (evolutionary background to neural mechanism)
Biological determinism and the naturalistic fallacy, there can still be an over-reliance on western gender roles and a tendency to default to biology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the replication crisis?

A

75% of social psychology studies and 50% of cognitive studies in this project failed the replication test (inconsistency)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are WEIRD samples?

A

Western educated industrial rich democratic samples - make up the majority of psychology samples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Tajfel’s minimal group paradigm?

A

Humans have a tendency to see their ingroup as an important part of their identity
- Humans can be sorted into groups for which paintings they prefer, and they wanted to maximise the success of the ingroup compared to the outgroup

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is Dunbar’s number?

A

150
Average size of hunter-gatherer society
Average number of Christmas cards
Average number of Facebook friends
- Thought that living socially was a major driving force in the evolution of the human brain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did Berkman and Breslow find in their 20 year longitudinal study of health and social contact?

A

Controlling for health factors (smoking, alcohol, weight etc), those with fewest relationships were twice as likely to die

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Why is social support important for our health?

A
  • Social support protects against depression (esp for women)
  • Providing social support may be more important than receiving it
  • Camraderie protects against emotional burnout in firefighters
  • Synchronised training creates higher pain tolerance in rowers
  • Feeling happy reduces cortisol levels, therefore less stress and less directing of energy away from basic body systems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What does early trading and hunting show?

A

Trading - early homo sapiens trading shells for food
Hunting - social chasing methods of hunting
Shows advantages of a social brain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What did Sherif et al (1961) find out about group psychology?

A

Group divisions were spontaneous
Group conflict became intense and they were very loyal towards own group
Only when given a superordinate goal were they able to become one group (repairing the water supply for the camp) - for survival
Therefore, group psychology is important to humans, however the group is flexible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What did Newson et al (2018) find out about group psychology through Brazilian football fans?

A

Intergroup violence supports social cohesion
Fans of same team were very socially fused with each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What human activity is seen as an equivalent for grooming in primates?

A

Gossip - humans spend 20% of waking time in conversation (should spend 42% of the time grooming if we were like other primates)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What did Dunbar (1993) find out about dining hall conversations?

A

Social relationships and personal experiences took up 70% of conversation time
Half of this was about third parties
Shows keeping track of social relationships to properly navigate your social world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What does informational conformity show us about human social learning/ reliance?

A

Humans learn how to do things from each other, thus are important and valuable to each other in navigating ambiguousness in social reality
Therefore, are likely to conform to other people’s answers
e.g. How far a spot was moving - when answers said out loud, people’s answer got closer to the other answers (Sherif, 1936)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What is Rubin’s (1970) discrimination between loving and liking

A

Love is not simply lots of liking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is Sternberg’s (1986) Triarchic model of love

A

1) Intimacy - closeness and understanding
2) Passion - physical or sexual attraction or romance
3) Commitment - the cognitive factors such as the decision to maintain the relationship

Just intimacy = liking
Just passion = infatuation
Just commitment = empty love

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is romantic, fatuous, companionate and consummate love? (Sternberg, 1986)

A

Romantic = intimacy + passion
Fatuous = passion + commitment
Companionate = intimacy + commitment
Consummate = intimacy + passion + commitment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What is passion?

A

An intense longing for union with the other (Hatfield and Walster, 1978)
Romantic passion is a motivational desire for intimacy (Carswell and Impett, 2021)
Passion is attributing arousal with a certain person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What did Dutton and Aron (1974) find out about misattribution of arousal?

A

Men who walked across a high rickety bridge rated a woman more attractive as those on a low stable bridge: heart beating faster was attributed to the woman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What are the three aspects of Hatfield and Sprecher’s (1986) Passionate love scale?

A

1) Cognitive - thinking about someone
2) Affective - attraction
3) Behavioural - maintaining physical closeness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What three independent systems of relationship behaviour does Fisher propose?

Neurotransmitters/hormones

A

1) Lust/sex drive - androgen (testosterone) mediated
2) Attraction (romantic love) - dopamine mediated (addiction model)
3) Attachment (long-term bonding) - oxytocin mediated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

How does proximity affect who we are friends with? (Student accommodation and neighbouring seats study)

A

“I do not believe that friends are necessarily the people you like best, they are merely the people who got there first” - Sir Peter Ustinov
- In student accommodation, people with rooms next to each other were more likely to be friends (Festinger et al., 1950)
- Sitting in neighbouring seats in a class predicts friendships 1 year later (Back et al., 2008)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Are proximity friendships due to a mere exposure effect? (Foreign words and classroom visitor studies)

A
  • Familiar fictitious foreign words rated more positive in meaning (Zajonc 1968)
  • Students rate classroom visitors they see more often more positively (Moreland and Beach 1992)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

How does similarity affect who we are friends with? (Student accommodation study)

A

Newcomb (1961) - students randomly assigned to dorms, and similarity of attitudes predicted friendship
Byrne and Clare (1974) - similarity in attitudes directly relates to liking/attraction
Tan & Singh (1995) - we also dislike people whose beliefs are different from ours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Is sharing positive or negative opinions more effective for friendship forming based on similarity? (Balance theory and social comparison theory)

A
  • Bosson et al - sharing negative opinions may create bonding
    Balance theory - Heider (1958), Newcomb (1961) - both liking something, both equal
    Social comparison theory - Festinger (1954) - use other people as a basis for making judgements about yourself - similar others provide validation for one’s own beliefs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Is similarity a predictor for romantic attraction? (Blind date study and role of commitment)

A

Byrne et al (1970):
- Paired blind dates as either very similar or dissimilar
- Similarity strong predictor of attraction, but so was attractiveness
The role of similarity depends on how much commitment is desired:
- Similarity desired for committed relationships
- For flings - dissimilarity is preferred (Amodio and Showers, 2005)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

How does reciprocity affect who we are friends with?

A

We like people who like us
Dittes and Kelley (1956) - experiment:
- Group discussion, followed by fake ‘approval ratings’ of each other
- Strongly affected their liking of group
Reciprocity can make up for absence of similarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

How does reciprocity of trust affect who we are friends with?

A

Collins and Miller (1994) Meta-analysis:
- Trust makes people like each other more
- Talking about personal matters creates trust and thus, liking
- Stronger for women than men, stronger for same-sex vs opposite sex pairings, level of disclosure did not make a difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What is social exchange theory?

A

Relationships are based on a principle of rewards and costs in interactions - is the relationship profitable?
Simple standard : Outcome (profit) = Rewards - Costs (absolute measure)
But, people don’t just want profit, they want the best possible outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What is the comparison level in social exchange theory? (High and low)

A

CL = what we feel we deserve from relationships, specific to the individual, based on prior experience, learning, personality
High CL = expect relationships to be rewarding, low rewards unacceptable and disappointing
Low CL - expect relationships to be troublesome, low rewards are acceptable and tolerable (Bella Swan)
Relationships that meet or exceed expectations are more satisfying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What is the comparison level for alternative in social exchange theory?

A

CLalt = what we realistically expect we could get elsewhere:
- Includes other partners or no partner
- Standard against which we decide to stay or leave

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

What is the role of dependence in social exchange theory? (CLalt equations)

A

Dependence = degree to which we feel psychologically linked to our relationship, determines whether we are motivated to stay or leave
This is not solely based on whether or not we are happy (could economically rely on partner)
- Low CLalt - high dependence even when there is high cost
- Satisfaction = outcome - CL
- Dependence = outcome - CLalt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What is equity theory?

A

People are motivated by self interest, but other people have options too - must be fair in order to get along
- People feel most comfortable when they get roughly what they deserve, no more and no less
- Concerned with fair distribution of rewards and costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

What are the three propositions of equity theory? (Equity vs equality)

A

1) Partners are concerned with fairness
2) Inequity causes distress
3) Partners will take steps to restore equity
- Partners have equal relative profit
- Don’t have to be same rewards, just same balance
Equality = give gift equal in value to what friend gave you
Equity = tally inputs into relationship (rides to work, social support) and give/do something in proportion to benefits received

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

What is the difference between business/casual relationships and close relationships? (Equity theory)

A

Clarks and Mills (1979) suggest casual/business relationships are based on exchange, but close relationships are communal (based on concern for other person, not expectation of reward)
Page et al (2019) childcare provision amongst Agta driven by reciprocity for friends, and need for kin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Are people are more likely to stick with the person in front of them than turn to other options?

A

Yes - online hookups often become long term
Campbell, 2002 - ‘emotions, not rational calculation, drive human behaviour’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Sampling issues with relationship research?

A

Most relationship research is white, heterosexual couples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

What are the four factors determining who we love?

A

Proximity
Similarity
Reciprocity
Physical attraction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

What did Walster et al (1966) find was the biggest predictor of liking someone in his Computer Dating paradigm?

A

How physically attractive other people rate them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

What did Mathes (1975) find was the most important factor to liking someone after the fifth date?

A

Similarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

What is the halo effect associated with attractiveness?

A
  • Greater overall liking
  • More desirable character traits (e.g. sensitive, warm, intelligent)
  • Higher evaluation of work performance
  • More lenient treatment in the legal system (Downs & Lyons, 1991) - lighter sentencing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

What positive life outcomes is attractiveness associated with?

A
  • Higher income (Hamermesh & Biddle, 1994)
  • Better mental health
  • More social influence (Chaiken, 1979)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

What is the Matching Hypothesis? (Berscheid & Walster)

A
  • Attraction is also about how attractive the other person thinks they are
  • Computer dating scenario
  • Similarity of attractiveness > attractiveness
  • Similarity more important for women than men
  • Self-esteem? Balance?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

What does the equality of physical attractiveness predict about length of relationship?

A

Different attractiveness - short
Equal attractiveness - long

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

How did attraction research change post-1980?

A
  • Cultural work expanded
  • Development of cognitive theories
  • Beginnings of evolutionary psychology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Evidence for beauty being objective?

A

1) High level of agreement across cultures (Langlois et al, 2000)
2) Certain facial features are reliably associated with attractiveness (Cunningham, 1986)
3) Babies prefer attractive faces - spend more time looking at faces adults think are attractive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

Evidence for beauty being subjective?

A

1) Different cultures “improve” beauty in different ways (Newman, 2000) e.g. face tattoos, neck rings
2) Different body types are judged to be more attractive in different parts of the world (Anderson et. al 1992)
3) Body type standards vary over time (Silverstein et al, 1986)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

What did Tovee et al (2006) find about Zulu body preference?

A

Zulus in South Africa rated high BMI bodies as more attractive than Zulu migrants in the UK and than Black British people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

What did Boothroyd et al (2016) find about TV consumption and body preference?

A

Nicaragua - very isolated community
No TV in village - highest attractiveness ratings for high BMI
TV 5 years ago - lower ratings
Capital city - even lower ratings
- Consumption of TV changes the type of body people see as attractive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

What did Thornborrow et al (2017) conclude about mens’ body type preferences on women?

A

Men’s preferences for large buttocks and hips:
Men more interested in the body in motion - thinking of bodies in terms of sex
Women did not have the same approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

What did Thornborrow et al (2020) find out about men’s preference for their own muscularity?

A

Nicaragua and Uganda - much more spread out preference
UK - specific preference for muscularity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

What evidence is there for an attraction to ‘averageness’? (Cognitive approach to attraction)

A
  • Facial prototype formation and attraction to ‘averageness’
  • Preference robust across adults
    e.g. Rhodes et al, Langlois et al
  • However infants seem to prefer distinctiveness (adults do not)
    e.g. Rhodes et al (2002): 6 month olds distinctiveness preference
    Giffrey and Little (2013): 1 to 2 year olds distinctiveness preference
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

What are visual adaptation effects and what evidence is there for this?

A

A person developing a preference for faces they have more exposure to (present in adults and children):
- Mixed vs single sex schools (Saxton et al, 2010) - in single sex schools, men preferred masculine female faces and women preferred feminine male faces
- Story book experiments (Anzures et al, 2008) - children saw contracted or expanded faces, and children who saw contracted were more likely to pick contracted as their preference and vice versa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

What evidence is there that averageness predicts attraction?

A
  • Zhao et al (2023)
  • 682 students were photographed and took part in speed dating
  • Averageness (and similarity) -> rated attractiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

What is sexual selection and inter-sexual selection?

A

Sexual selection:
- Differential mating/reproduction
Inter-sexual selection:
- Opposite sex prefers some traits more than others increasing the frequency of those genes in the next generation (attractive/successful traits passed on, ‘attractive’ traits benefit the chooser)
- Choosing healthy genes in a partner will give a person healthy offspring
- e.g. averageness is associated with health? (Rhodes et al) ‘average’ people had a gene for more resistance to pathogens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

What is monogamy, polygyny, polyandry and promiscuity? (human mating systems)

A
  • Monogamy - one male, one female
  • Polygyny - several females, one male
  • Polyandry - several males, one female
  • Promiscuity - no bonded relationships (chimps)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

Are humans monogamous?

A
  • ‘A history of mild polygyny?’
  • ‘A monogamous species plagued by polygyny?’
  • Serially monogamous?
  • 17 women for every man - human genome - indicates polygyny
  • Modest size dimorphism and intermediate testicular volume - the more males that females are mating with, the bigger the testicular volume due to sperm competition
  • Sperm competition means some polyandry too
  • Conclusion - Monogamish
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

What is anisogamy?

A

One reproductive cell being much bigger than the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

What is differential parental investment?

A

Any investment made in a particular offspring which contributes to its survival and fitness which comes at the cost of being able to invest in other offspring (Trivers, 1972)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

How is obligate parental investment different in females vs males?

A

Female:
- Large gamete
- Mating
- Gestation
- Parturition
- Lactation
- Extended care beyond weaning
Male:
- Small gamete
- Mating
(Although both parents can provide extended care)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

How do standards of mating partners differ between males and females? (Sexual strategies theory)

A
  • Maternally biased parental investment
  • Females = ‘limiting factor’
  • Females possibly more careful about who they reproduce with as they have more to lose as they carry the child and are more involved with it through things like breastfeeding
  • Bus and Schmitt (1993) - sexual strategies theory - sex that is limiting factor (women) should be more choosy, and men should compete
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
73
Q

What are male and female priorities in short and long-term relationships?

A

Male:
Short term - proceptivity (person being interested back), fertility
Long term - youth, fertility, faithfulness
Female:
Short term - good genes (high quality child who will provide grandchildren)
Long term - resources/status, generosity
(Women consistently want a bit more than men)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
74
Q

What is most important in a procreative relationship between a man and woman?

A

Mutual attraction, dependable personality, health and intelligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
75
Q

What are examples of fertility cues in women?

A
  • Waist-hip ratio
    (Singh et al, 1992)
    Males favoured high waist-hip ratio
    However, confounding waist-hip ratio with BMI
  • Femininity
    (Law Smith et al, 2006)
  • Facial attractiveness
    Could be due to oestrogen so could indicate fertility
    However, it is hard to link facial femininity to underlying fertility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
76
Q

What is the handicap principle? (Zahavi, 1975)

A

Females prefer males with handicaps (mating characters that reduce survival chances) because handicaps are indicators of heritable viability (surviving despite the handicap)
e.g. having an extravagant tail means you are far from predators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
77
Q

How can parasite infestation be shown? (Hamilton and Zuk 1982)

A

Colouration in mandril’s nose is an indicator of health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
78
Q

Why is immunocompetence favoured in a partner? (Folstad and Karter 1996)

A

For more testosterone, a person needs a really good immune system so all body systems can work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
79
Q

What are attraction ‘universals’?

A
  • Averageness
  • Femininity in women
  • Symmetry and health
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
80
Q

How is symmetry a cue to health and why is this desired in a partner?

A
  • The less healthy you are the more the environment assaults you and the less symmetric you are
  • Jones et al (2001) - measured symmetry of 60 faces - symmetry predicted ‘apparent health’ and ‘skin patch health’
  • Benefits:
    Offspring inherit immunity to current pathogens and avoid infection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
81
Q

What did Kleisner at al (2023) find about attraction to faces based on symmetry, averageness and femininity?

A

1550 participants from 10 countries (uni/urban/semi-urban)
More feminised female faces looked more attractive
Weak to zero link between symmetry and attractiveness
Distinctiveness was rated less attractive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
82
Q

What are biological markets in non-humans? Examples?

A
  • We all have embodied value in particular contexts
  • Sticklebacks: Kraak and Bakker (1998) - male sticklebacks that are more red have a tendency to swim towards larger females who will lay more eggs as they are higher quality
  • Zebra finches: Burley et al (1996) - males with red leg band (more attractive) mated more but nested less
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
83
Q

What is relationship-specific investment inventory? (Biological markets in humans)

A
  • Gangestad and Thornhill (1999):
  • Men who had less body fluctuating asymmetry - they engaged in less relationship behaviours
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
84
Q

How do lonely hearts ads fit with biological markets in humans?

A
  • Explicit mate advertisements (lonely hearts ads) - women say less about themselves and more about what they want
  • Older women make fewer requests and are less likely to say their age
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
85
Q

What did Little et al (2001) find about more attractive females selecting partners?

A

More attractive females prefer more symmetric men
- People who think they are more attractive select more attractive partners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
86
Q

What are examples of ornamentation? (increasing attractiveness)

A
  • Makeup - makes skin look healthier, makes you look younger
  • Corset - waist to hip ratio
  • High heels - exaggerates movement of a wider pelvis when you walk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
87
Q

What did Wohlraub et al (2009) find out about tattoos, dominance and attractiveness in men?

A

Didn’t make them appear more attractive to women, made them seem more dominant - male to male competition

88
Q

What is sexual imprinting?

A

Parents influence mate preferences in many birds and mammals - the one that raised you influences your preference for mate.

89
Q

What is assortative mating?

A

Individuals with similar phenotypes or genotypes mate with each other more frequently

90
Q

Why might assortative mating happen?

A

Helps keep good gene-complexes together
Increases parents’ relatedness to their own children

91
Q

What does age of parents predict? Why might this be?

A
  • Age of parents you are exposed to when growing up predicts the age you find attractive
  • People likely to have partners who look like that gender parent
  • Could just be parent is a model of a nice person
  • Mechanism - we spend more time looking at relatives (high exposure) - has an effect on what we think a person should look like later
  • Imprinting is likely a byproduct of learning what faces look like and high exposure with parents, as it is the same with adoptive children - about learning not inherent genetics
92
Q

What does ‘humans are sexually dimorphic’ mean?

A

The sexes are physically different
e.g. men being generally physically larger

93
Q

What are examples of gender discrimination/disparities?

A

Gender pay gap = 15.5% overall and up to 55% in finance sector
Gender discrimination still seen in employment
Honour killings
Silent epidemic of male suicide
Trans and non-binary people fear expressing their gender identity

94
Q

What is the difference between sex and gender?

A

Sex is biological (females make the bigger gametes, however definitions of sex have also been subject to cultural change), gender is social (psychological identity)

95
Q

What are gender roles and what is gender identity?

A
  • Gender roles - behaviours considered appropriate for males and females
  • Gender identity - perception of oneself as male or female
96
Q

What are essentialist and conditionalist aspects of gender?

A

Essentialist (inherent qualities of being a certain gender)
Conditionalist (the way in which you are male and female depends on context)

97
Q

Why is sex not dichotomous? (Chromosomes)

A

1 in 400 livebirths show sex chromosome atypicalities
- X0 - Turner’s syndrome
- XXX
- XXY - Klinefelter’s syndrome
- XYY

98
Q

Why is sex not dichotomous? (Hormones)

A
  • Atypical hormone exposure in utero
  • Congenital adrenal hyperplasia - excess testosterone
  • Androgen insensitivity syndrome - body does not process testosterone
    Keevil et al (2017) - over 4000 ppts - salivary testosterone - many men’s T levels are indistinguishable from ‘above average’ women
  • Controversial advantages in sport for women with high testosterone
  • Higher average testosterone production for non-running sports compared to running sports
99
Q

What did Joe et al (2015) find?

A

Sex differences in brain regions in 1400 brains

100
Q

Why is gender not dichotomous?

A
  • EHRC: 1.3% of UK population identify as gender variant (e.g. trans, non-binary, or agender)
  • Nolan et al (2019) - review of gender diversity and gender-confirming surgery in the USA - estimated 0.39-2.7% of population are gender variant
101
Q

How is Cohen’s D calculated for gender?

A

Cohen’s D = Male average - female average/ pooled standard deviation
+ value means men are higher
- value means women are higher

102
Q

What do D scores do and what is the D score for gender difference?

A

D scores summarise overlap/ difference
D score for gender difference = 11

103
Q

What are small, medium and large D effects?

A

Small = 0.2 (85% overlap)
Medium = 0.5 (67% overlap)
Large = 0.8 (52% overlap)

104
Q

What characteristics have S, M and L D effects been found in? (Males > females)

A

Physical aggression (S)
Balloon task (S)
Individual contribution (S)
Task orientation of same-sex groups (S)
Autocratic leadership (S)
Emerging as task leader (S)
Task leadership behaviour (S)
Time on active task behaviour (M)
Equity of rewards (S)

105
Q

What characteristics have S, M and L D effects been found in? (Females > males)

A

Positive social behaviour (M)
Smaller reward for self (S)
Social task performance (M)
Democratic leadership (S)
Influences by group pressure (S)
Visual decoding of emotion (S)
Visual and auditory decoding of emotion (L)
Face recognition (S)
Accuracy of facial expression (sending) (M)
Smiling (M)
Gazing (M)
Bodily expressiveness (M)

106
Q

What are psychometric tests and why must they be reliable and valid?

A

Paper-and-pencil tests of beliefs, preferences, behaviours
They must be:
- Reliable - consistent in their measurement over time and measuring a single underlying construct
- Valid - test scores correlate with behavioural external criterion (concurrent or predictive)

107
Q

What sex differences were found in psychometric tests?

A

Male > female:
- Psychotocism (S)
Female > male
- Liberal sex role attitudes (M)
- Closeness to others (S)
- Self-disclosure (S)
- Anxiety (S)
- External Locus of control (S)
(Significant cross-cultural variation with this)

108
Q

What is the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI)?

A
  • Bem suggested that masculinity and femininity were two separate dimensions
  • Lists of words were generated
  • Raters asked to state whether they were more desirable in men or in women:
    Women score higher than men on the femininity scale of the BSRI
    While men score higher than women on the masculinity scale
109
Q

What was a problem with the Bem Sex Role Inventory? (BSRI)

A
  • People’s ratings of themselves as masculine or feminine don’t relate to their self-ratings on the rest of the scales
  • Masculinity and femininity are not statistically independent
    Others have argued that Bem’s scales measure something other than masculinity/ femininity:
  • Expressivity vs. Instrumentality (task orientation) (Spence 1974)
  • Nurturance vs Dominance (Wiggins 1989)
  • Communion vs Agency (Bakan 1966)
110
Q

Why does BSRI not accurately capture sex and gender?

A

Both sex and gender exist on continua
Sex and gender are mosaic not monolithic

111
Q

What different theories and approaches are there as to why gender differences exist in social behaviour?

A
  • Cultural/social approaches:
  • Social role theory
  • Learning theory and Gender schema theory
  • Biological approaches:
  • Evolutionary arguments
  • Biological development
112
Q

What is the standard social science model of sex and gender (evolutionary psychologists)

A

Sex = irrelevant
Gender = learned and socially imposed

113
Q

What is Social role theory of gender? (Eagly 1987)

A

Culturally imposed gendered division of labour leads to:
- Conformity to gender role expectations
- Sex typed skills and beliefs
leads to:
- Sex differences in behaviour

114
Q

How strong is the division of labour? (Mead and Ember)

A
  • Mead (1935) - sex and temperament - made claims that gender roles are purely cultural and can be inverted across different cultures, or both sexes feminine or both sexes masculine
  • Ember (1981) - Asked if certain tasks were exclusively gendered in all cultures (Standard cross cultural sample)
    Male exclusive = warfare, hunting etc
    Female exclusive = principal care-taking of infants
    Male predominant = herding, land clearing, building, butchery
    Female predominant = Gathering, weaving, laundry
115
Q

What did Haas et al (2020) find that contradicts Ember (1981)? (Sexual division of labour)

A

Burial evidence for female hunter in the Andes 9K YBP
Other evidence across the Americas in similar time range

116
Q

What did Marlow find about foraging differences between the genders?

A

Men mostly dealt with large fauna, fowl and fish, whereas women dealt with small fauna, eggs, insects, shellfish and vegetables

117
Q

What does biosocial reformulation propose? (Wood & Eagly, 2002)

A

Biological differences between the sexes have no direct link to gender differences in behaviour

118
Q

Does the division of labour affect stereotypes and vice versa?

A
  • Yes - stereotype threat and maths performance - telling girls that generally they are worse at maths makes their performance worse
  • No - stereotypes have remained consistent over last 50 years despite change in division of labour
  • No - children show sex differences in behaviour before they have stereotypes
119
Q

What did Swim (1994) find about perceived and actual gender differences in behaviours?

A

Stereotype (perceived) was weaker than actual difference, therefore the stereotype cannot be the cause of behaviour

120
Q

How are sex differences changing in egalitarian societies?

A
  • Sex differences in impulsivity seem to be declining as we become more egalitarian
  • Sex differences in some personality traits in egalitarian societies have become larger, not smaller
121
Q

What did Schwartz et al (2009) find out about national gender equality?

A

National gender equality predicts bigger sex differences in benevolence/power values - because women change more.

122
Q

What is Learning theory of sex differences in behaviour? (Mischel (1966)
What contradicts it?

A

Boys and girls are encouraged and rewarded for different behaviours
- Baby X studies - people treat a baby differently based on whether they think the baby is a boy or a girl
- BUT meta-analysis found no support for boys and girls being punished for different things, but found difference in sex-typed toys and chores - different training in skills or experiences as a result of their gender (Lytton and Romney 1991)

123
Q

What did Bandura (1973) find about gender differences and what refutes this?

A

Social learning theory (Bandura 1973): emphasized importance of modelling - social learning instead of conditioning
- BUT
- Sex of model by sex of child interaction not found over 80 studies (Maccoby and Jacklin 1974) - child equally likely to copy either
- Imitation is found when model engages in sex-typical behaviour (Perry and Bussey 1979)

124
Q

What did Perry & Bussey (1979) find about copying model choice behaviour based on gender?

A

Gendered copying when there was a medium to high preference, in chance condition the choice is equal - children observe patterns in the environment and fit themselves into that pattern

125
Q

What is gender schema theory?

A

Attend to gender-typed information as schema develops

126
Q

Is there a correlation between gender stereotype knowledge, sophistication of gender knowledge AND sex typed behaviours?
(Ruble and Martin 1998)

A

No
Children cannot necessarily verbalise gender permanence but still recognise gender stereotype patterns and stereotypes

127
Q

What does perceiving the self as more sex-typed predict? Liben et al (2002)

A

Predicts later gender stereotyping in children - stereotyping flows from own gender

128
Q
A
129
Q

What is the role of the media on gender stereotypes?

A

Average TV watching:
- 4 y/o = 2 hours
- 12 y/o = 4 hours
Children’s characters are mostly male and still gender stereotyped

130
Q

What was watching rap videos associated with? (Gender) (Bryant, 2008)

A

Negative views of women and the sexes’ relationship

131
Q

What does evolutionary theory of gender differences propose? (Inter-sexual selection and intra- sexual competition)

A

Sexual selection = main focus
- Differential mating/ reproduction
- Inter-sexual selection: opposite sex prefers some traits more than others increasing the frequency of those genes in the next generation
- Intra-sexual competition: some traits make an individual a better competitor against members of their own sex

132
Q

What is parental investment? (PI)

A

The sex which has lower PI tends to compete for mating access (x species)
- The sex which has the higher PI tends to be ‘choosy’ (selective)
- In most species, this leads to competitive males and choosy females

133
Q

How does parental investment explain male stereotypes?

A

1) Males compete for females
2) Male reproductive success (RS) depends on number of sexual partners -> polygyny can benefit males
3) Polygyny -> competition for dominance/ resources
We see the legacy in men’s greater competitiveness, dominance striving, sensitivity to slight and aggression

134
Q

How does parental investment explain female stereotypes?

A

1) Females more important to offspring survival - lactation
2) Females who avoid physical danger have higher reproductive success (RS)
3) Intra-female tensions need diverting safely and women need safety in numbers
4) Women more likely to engage in foraging than hunting
We see the legacy in women’s aversion to physical risk, low aggression, stronger social skills and greater use of democratic leadership, and a sex difference in spatial reasoning

135
Q

What assumptions does parental investment effect on gender stereotypes have?

A

Key assumptions:
- Ancestral polygyny, (probably only true for a minority of men)
- Genetic inheritance
- Biological (ish) causation

136
Q

What are sex-linked and sex-limited genes?

A
  • Selection acts through genes
  • Sex-linked gene - location on the X or Y chromosome (allosomes)
  • Sex-limited gene - located on a different chromosome (autosomes), ‘turned on’ by the presence of sex hormone
  • Most sex differences are sex limited
    Because:
  • Y chromosome - small (30ish genes vs several thousand)
  • Principally carries the SRY gene - manufacture of testes and inhibition of female reproductive organs
137
Q

What is testosterone and what are levels affected by?

A
  • An androgen released by testes
  • Men - the sensitivity to testosterone is determined by the mother
  • Organising effects: foetal production of T - 6 weeks (gest) - 3 months (post partum)
  • Activating effects: T rises again at puberty
  • However, impact depends upon T levels and number of receptors
  • Testosterone primes learning of gendered behaviour
138
Q

How does androgential syndrome support sex differences effects of testosterone?

A

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia/ adrenogenital syndrome
- Surge of adrenal testosterone in utero - caused by metabolic error and cortisol deficiency
- 1 in 15,000 births
- CAH boys - larger genitals and higher on aggression (Berenbaum and Resnick 1997)
- CAH females - external organs masculinised, corrected with surgery and cortisol
- Aged 4-19: male stereotyped energy expenditure, sex of playmates, interest in marriage, motherhood and child care, doll play, ‘tomboys’, visuospatial ability (however this is related to experience) (Erhadt 1975)
- Most have female gender identity

139
Q

What does the majority of evidence point towards early T exposure predicting?

A

There is limited evidence for sex differences in infancy behaviour (Else-Quest et al, 2006)
- Early T exposure may predict later play typicality (Pasterski et al., 2015)

140
Q

What does increased boy typical behaviour cause?

A

More penile growth in early months - early exposure to testosterone, priming boys for later in life

141
Q

Who are the Batista boys?

A
  • Family with a rare genetic disorder - XY foetuses under-exposed to T in utero
  • 18 ‘boys’ raised unambiguously as girls
  • At puberty, they all experiences release of T - grew beards, clitoris become penis, voices broke
  • 17/18 had male identity, 16/17 had male gender role
    Evidence for testosterone effects on gender differences
    But, was it such an easy switch because it’s a common disorder in the area? Cultural expectations?
142
Q

What is canalised development?

A

Genes create finite number of options for the environment to choose/ refine

143
Q

How does the case of Bruce/Brenda/David Reimer support biosocial theory?

A

The penectomised twin
He lost his penis due to complications with circumcision
He was raised as a girl instead - socialisation and oestrogen treatment
Then later in life realised he was male and transitioned
Shows you can’t change someone’s gender identity for them
Diamond, 1982 - nature sets limits to sexual identity, and within these limits social forces interact and gender roles are formulated - a biosocial interaction theory

144
Q

What can epigenetics tell us about gender differences?

A

Combines social and biological approaches
- More sophisticated than biosocial approach
- Genes and environment interaction
- Canalised development - genes create finite number of options for the environment to ‘choose’/ refine

145
Q

What did Hines et al (2016) find out about CAH?

A
  • Pre-natal T affects response to information on toy ‘gender typicality’
  • CAH females made far fewer gendered choices
  • Early testosterone gives initial affinity for gender-typed behaviour
146
Q

What is aggression?

A

‘Any form of behaviour directed toward the goal of harming or injuring another living being who is motivated to avoid such treatment’ (Baron and Richardson 1994)
- Intention
- Harm (includes emotional distress)
- Motivation to avoid

147
Q

How is observation used to study aggression?

A
  • Mainly done with children
  • Ecologically valid
  • Time consuming
  • Ethics of observing aggression?
148
Q

How are lab experiments used to study aggression?

A
  • E.g. Think they’re giving someone an electric shock or ‘negative ratings’
  • Point subtraction paradigm
  • Ecological validity?
149
Q

How are self-report questionnaires used to study aggression?

A
  • Relies on memory/honesty
  • Large samples possible
  • Validity?
150
Q

How does the Buss & Perry Aggression Questionnaire measure physical and verbal aggression and hostility?

A

“Given enough provocation, I may hit another person” - physical
“I often find myself disagreeing with people” - verbal
“When people are especially nice, I wonder what they want” - hostility

151
Q

How does the Conflict Tactics Scale measure aggression?

A

Asks people to report incidents of:
- Shouting
- Hitting
- Striking with a blunt implement etc…
- Real evidence
- Ethical issues of admitting to illegal activities
- Many physical, few verbal, does not include sexual violence

152
Q

What is direct and indirect aggression?

A
  • Direct aggression - the aggressor is identifiable and can be counter-attacked
  • Indirect aggression - the aggressor remains hidden (e.g. spreading rumours)
153
Q

What is instrumental and expressive aggression?

A
  • Instrumental - aggression in order to achieve a goal
  • Expressive - aggression as expression of internal state ‘When impelling forces cannot be contained by inhibitory forces’ (Driscoll, 2006)
154
Q

What is the psychoanalytic theory of expressive aggression?

A
  • ID, ego and superego - weak ego
  • Develop superego (moral compass) over time - If this is weak, the ID takes over
  • If there is weak ego it cannot handle the conflict between superego and ID and aggression comes out
155
Q

What is Thanatos theory? (Sabina Spielrein)?

A
  • Drive requires discharge through catharsis (purging) - ID drives you to destruction
156
Q

What evidence supports that catharsis does not work?

A
  • Shock giving (after ‘attack’) leads to increases -not decreases - in subsequent punitiveness (Berkowitz 1965)
  • Aggression increases in US football players over the course of the season (Patterson 1974)
  • Spectator hostility increases during match (Russell 1983)
  • Catharsis beliefs may be harmful
157
Q

What is frustration-aggression theory? (Dollard et al. 1939)

A

Frustration is the interference with a goal response that leads to a reward
- Aggression always results from frustration
- Frustration does not always lead to aggression
Level of aggression depends on:
- Whether aggression will end the frustration i.e. is instrumental (Buss 1966)
- Whether some subsequent account of the frustration is offered, e.g. apology (Obuchi et al. 1989) - less likely to get aggression then
- ‘Common sense’ argument - frustrations produce aggressive actions because they are unpleasant (Berkowitz, 1989)

158
Q

What environmental factors could increase aggression?

A
  • Violence peaks when temp is highest
  • Misattribution of arousal?
  • However also more chance for big groups of people to congregate if there is no rain or cold
  • Berkowitz (1989) - all unpleasant stimuli increase negative effect, but context and higher order of cognition adjust chances of aggression
159
Q

What is Cognitive Neo-Associationist Theory? (Berkowitz, 1993)

A

Aversive (unpleasant) event: frustration but also heat, pain etc ->
Unspecific negative affect with two possible behavioural reactions: fight or flight ->
Either:
- Aggressive cues or memories? Quick and unconcious association with negative effect - rudimentary anger, activation of associative aggressive network and aggressive response
- Fear cues or memories? Quick and unconcious association with negative effect - rudimentary fear, activation of associative fear network and flight/fear response

160
Q

What is the social learning theory of aggression?

A

1) Operant conditioning
2) Modelling
e.g. child aggressing towards mother after she has been nagging him to stop watching TV - child’s aggression reinforced
Positive reinforcement - still watching TV
Negative reinforcement - nagging has stopped

161
Q

What did Bandura and MacDonald (1963) find out about modelling vs reinforcement?

A
  • Group 1 - observe adult model making moral judgments
  • Group 2 - child’s own responses reinforced
  • Group 3 - no feedback (control)
    Group 1 made more mature judgments at post-test than Groups 2 and 3
  • Modelling&raquo_space; Reinforcement
162
Q

What is the link between TV and aggression? (Joy et al. 1986)

A
  • Introduction of TV in British Colombia towns
  • 3 communities: none, some, limited TV
  • Total TV watching led to more aggression - not specifically violent programmes
163
Q

What did Johnston et al (20020 find about long term TV watching and aggression?

A

Long term longitudinal correlations of amount of TV watching and level of aggression between 14 and 18/22 years

164
Q

What did Anderson & Bushman (2001) find out about computer games and aggression? What contradicts this?

A

Meta-analysis: games - Increase aggressive behaviour and decrease prosocial behaviour, increases arousal
But - angry people who believe in catharsis are drawn to violent video games (Bushman and Whitaker, 2010)

165
Q

What did Prescott et al (2018) find out about computer games, anger and race?

A
  • Clear effect across longitudinal studies on self-/other-report physical aggression in White participants
  • Especially with >1yr follow up
  • Weaker in Asians, null for Hispanic ppts
166
Q

What did Bushman and Gibson (2011) find out about computer games and rumination?

A
  • Experiment with 126 students
  • Aggression 24hrs later tested by giving ‘losers’ in task a noise blast
  • Rumination is key … so more about cognitive element? (e.g. Berkowitz?)
167
Q

How can cultural influences to aggression be seen in white males from the American south?

A
  • Settler mentality culturally transmitted through generations (frontier communities from rieving areas, no CJS, wealth can be easily stolen)
  • “Argument-related” (non-felony) homicides 6x times higher in southern than northern US states
  • State-wide homicide rate in US is positively correlated with proportion of white population from the south (Blau and Blau 1982)
  • Southerners endorse violence as legitimate response to insult and for protection (Nisbett, 1993)

White males “accidentally” bumped into and insulted by a confederate (Cohen et al. 1996). Southerners more likely to:
- Believe their masculine reputation was threatened
- Show a rise in cortisol (stress response)
- Show a rise in testosterone (dominance challenged)
- Engage in dominating behaviour subsequently (chicken game - who steps to one side when walking towards each other)

168
Q

What is Felson’s (1992) symbolic interactionist framework?

A

Symbolic interactionist / impression management approach
- ‘Face’ as critical social currency
- Rules of conversation require cooperation: “mutual facework” (Goffman 1959)
1. Slight interpreted as intentional attack
2. Negative alter-casting creates unfavourable social identity.
3. Retaliation
- deters further attack and saves face
- but threatens the face of the other party
- Gives rise to escalating “conflict spiral”

169
Q

What is the conflict spiral sequence? (Felson 1984)

A

Based on 191 episodes of homicide and assault
Identity attack:
- Wimp
Influence attempt:
- Take that back
Noncompliance:
- Make me
3rd party instigation/mediation:
- Hit him/ he’s not worth it
Threat:
- I’ll kill you
Possible evasive action
Commitment to violence

170
Q

What do evolutionary approaches say about the cost/benefit balance of aggression?

A

Cost of injury < Benefit of success = Aggress

171
Q

What do evolutionary approaches say about gender differences in aggression?

A
  • Particular focus on sex differences - benefits to men and costs to women
  • The more severe the aggression, the bigger the gender difference
  • Sex differences appear before 2 years (Potegal and Archer, 2004)
  • And before children can apply gender labels (Campbell, Shirley and Caygill, 2002)
    So what are potential benefits to men?
172
Q

What do Daly and Wilson (1988) say about aggression for mate competition?

A

Mate competition = key
- Male-male homicide is greater than any other kind in every country
- High rank = access to more mates
- Physical aggression = high risk/ high gain
- High willingness to be aggressive in men - being aggressive in a targeted way when it is required
- Adaptive aggression - securing scarce resources
- Male primate rank is associated with RS (reproductive success)
- e.g. Gelada Baboons (no female choice of mates - males fight among themselves)

173
Q

Why is homicide a good measure of aggression?

A

Homicide - good indicator of violent behaviour - if there is a corpse and a perpetrator, it is easier to attribute someone to it than other violent crimes

174
Q

What is RHP - resource holding potential?

A
  • Humans - Perusse (1986) (female choice) - RHP (resource holding potential) - number of potential conceptions that men had - higher ranked businessmen had more potential conceptions
  • Humans typically establish status by RHP (jobs, wealth, hunting prowess)
  • Where RHP is low, males use other means to establish status e.g. physical dominance
175
Q

What differences in aggression are there depending on marital status and employment? Why?

A

Still in mating market - sexually mature but not likely to be married, high testosterone

Controlling for age, same-sex violence/ violent crime are more frequent among:
- Non-married men and the unemployed (Daly and Wilson 1988)
- Non-fathers than fathers (Boothroyd and Cross 2016)
- Why?
- Offers explanation of male sensitivity to status which other approaches do not explain
- Men are very focused on status/face/honour, especially in low SES (socio-economic status)groups

176
Q

What is the link between violence and inequality?

A
  • Aggression as response to inequality/ resource shortage
  • Violent crime rates are sensitive to poverty
  • Wolfgang and Ferracuti (1967) argued for a ‘subculture of violence’ in inner city Philadelphia - cultural context of using violence to resolve things - racist but switch from genetic groupings to cultural groupings (black genetics to black culture)
  • Daly and Wilson - it is actually a rational response to persistent inequality - lack of status
  • Schacter et al: US vs Canada - similar levels of gun ownership, but US has higher gun violence as well as higher levels of poverty and inequality
177
Q

What did Campbell (1999) find out about the costs of aggression to women?

A
  • Useful to be high status as a woman - better resources (infant survival)
  • Infant survival most dependant on mothers - e.g. Ache infant mortality (Hill and Hurtado, 1996)
  • Physical aggression = very high risk/ low gain - more gain for men as it enables them to father more children, however it puts women’s potential and existing children at a risk that is not worth it
  • Aversion to aggression in women
  • Fear of injury as a crucial factor
  • Women have more blood/animal phobias (Marks, 1987)
  • Women rate situations as more dangerous than men and have greater fear of physical attack (less risk) (Bettencourt and Miller, 1996)
178
Q

When do women typically express aggression?

A

Female aggression = non-violent/indirect (Bjorkqvist 1994) - achieves ends with safer means, violence only when anger spills over fear threshold
Apart from maternal aggression - strong response to reproductive success being threatened

179
Q

How do men and women view their own aggression differently? (Campbell, 1993)

A
  • Men viewed their aggression as instrumental
  • Women viewed their aggression as expressive - a loss of control
  • Men can (potentially) gain status/ fitness through aggression
  • Women only aggressive if worth the risk
180
Q

What is the heritability of aggression? What does this suggest about the cause of aggression levels?

A

Aggression is strongly heritable (40-50%
- Very stable over time
- Correlation over 1 year = 0.9/0.8
- Correlation over 20 years = 0.4
- Suggests a genetic component
- As well as cultural/environmental influences (Moffitt, 2005) and (Caspi et al, 2002)

181
Q

How does testosterone link to aggression?

A

· Male T>Female T
· Male T is highest - when young, when single and when childless (Peter Grey) - exactly the same as violent crime
· T levels inversely relate to (unconcious) fear (e.g. van Honk et al, 2005)

182
Q

What evidence is there that T causes aggression?

A
  • Trans individuals - trans women with T suppressors - less angry, trans men with T - more angry (van Goozen et al, 1995) - either effect of T or people feeling more comfortble conforming to gender roles once body changes
  • Carre et al (2023) - only in high risk/ dominant men who were already more aggressive than average
  • Increasing testosterone levels is not the same as naturally having higher or lower testosterone - body accustomed to a certain level
  • T -> dominance behaviours
  • Rat injection studies - more T - behavioural dominance
  • Human competition e.g. tennis, dominoes contests, T rises in anticipation of male-male competition - observers as well as ppts - coalitionary aggression
183
Q

What evidence is there that aggression causes an increase in T? Is the relationship straightforward?

A

· Winning vs losing is very important
· Tennis players - (Booth et al, 2003)
· Football spectators
· Randomly assigned sumo-betting (Pound et al, 2009)
· Adaptive feedback loop?
· Schaal et al (1996) - Adolescent boys - high T - high dominance - low aggression - no one messes with you - not a straight forward relationship between T and aggression

184
Q

How is inhibitory control of aggression linked to T?

A

Aggression is associated with poor self-control and high impulsivity (Eisenburg et al, 2001; Moffit et al, 2002)
- Testosterone - reduces inhibitory control in experimental rats - Svensson et al (2003), is higher in psychopaths (cannot control impulsive behaviours) - Dolan et al (2001)

185
Q

What sex differences are there in impulsivity and aggression?
What evidence suggests there is still a cultural component?

A
  • Impulsivity as a mediator for sex differences in aggression - Campbell, 2006; Struber, Luck and Roth, 2008)
  • Sex differences in impulsivity exist (albeit declining) - Cross, Copping and Campbell, 2010
    BUT sensation seeking reversed in matrilineal Mosuo girls, so still cultural effects - people stay in maternal home, women own land , Mosuo girls have higher levels of risk taking in behavioural tasks than boys when first starting school (not exposed to patrilineal families yet)
186
Q

What is altruism?

A

The principle and practice of concern for the well-being and/or happiness of other humans or animals above oneself

187
Q

What happened to Kitty Genovese (1964, Queens) and what did this spark?

A

Stabbed multiple times on separate occasions - loads of people heard her screaming but no one called police - why?
- Led to social science research into altruism
- However - actually because there was not a specific police number and could not coordinate help - neighbours did try to stop attacker

188
Q

What are Latane & Darley’s (1970) Five steps to emergency intervention?

A

Emergency
1) Notice something is happening
- Distraction
- Self concerns e.g. being late
2) Interpret event as emergency
- Ambiguity - is she really sick or just drunk?
- Relationship between attacker and victim - they can resolve their own family quarrels
- Pluralistic ignorance - no one else seems worried
3) Take responsibility for providing help
- Diffusion of responsibility - someone else must have called 999
4) Decide how to help
- Lack of competence - I’m not trained to handle this
5) Provide help
- Audience inhibition - I’ll look like a fool
- Costs exceed rewards - what if I do something wrong and get sued?

189
Q

How is pluralistic ignorance shown by Latane and Darley? (1970) - smoke experiment

A
  • Ppts completed questionnaire alone/ with 2 others
  • Smoke begins to pour through ventilator
  • How long till someone reacts?
  • Alone: 50% leave after 2 mins, 75% leave by 6 mins
  • Together: 12% leave after 2 mins, 38% leave by 6 mins
190
Q

What is pluralistic ignorance?

A

Look to others to define ambiguous events
- Another form of informational conformity

191
Q

How is diffusion of responsibility shown by Latane and Darley? (1968) - epileptic fit experiment

A
  • Ppts in cubicles with headphones
  • Take part in discussion - E leaves
  • One ppt has epileptic fit. Help given within 60 seconds?
  • Victim + participant = 85%
  • Victim + participant + 2 = 62%
  • Victim + participant + 4 = 31%
192
Q

What is diffusion of responsibility?

A

Responsibility divisible by number present

193
Q

How does co-witnesses being unable to help affect diffusion of responsibility?

A

Bickman (1971) - responsibility not diffused when co-witnesses are clearly not able to help

194
Q

How does being specifically attached to a bystander affect diffusion of responsibility?

A

Moriarty (1975) - responsibility not diffused when specifically attached to a bystander
e.g. asking someone to keep an eye on your bag - form specific attachment because they personally were asked, person much more likely to do something if someone tries to take the bag

195
Q

What did Fischer et al (2011) find out about moderators of the bystander effect in their meta-analysis?

A
  • Meta-analytic review (105 studies) finds overall effect size of d= -.35 for bystander apathy (small - medium effect size of tendency to not help in artificial scenarios)
  • Bystander effect is reduced when there is no clear danger (no ambiguity, perpetrator is present, solution requires cooperation) - dangerous emergencies are recognised faster and more clearly as real emergencies, thereby inducing higher levels of arousal and hence more helping
  • Bystander effect is increased - among females compared to men (lack of confidence in own judgment and ability), among strangers, lab>field, increased number of bystanders (pluralistic ignorance and diffusion of responsibility)
196
Q

What did Joe \Delaney do?

A

1983, Chennault Park, Louisiana
- Saw two boys struggling in the lake - saved them but ended up drowning

197
Q

How does kin selection and inclusive fitness explain altruism?

A
  • Darwin’s puzzle of altruism solved by Hamilton (1963)
  • The unit of selection is the gene not the individual
  • Our genes exist in relatives (inclusive fitness)
  • Individual fitness = number of living children a person can produce
  • Inclusive fitness = number of copies of a person’s genes that can make it into the next generation no matter how they get there (could be through family members)
  • More altruistic to family members
  • Coefficient of genetic relatedness should be related to altruism (share more DNA, more altruism)
198
Q

What is Hamilton’s rule of kin selection?

A

Offer help where:
RS cost to me < RS benefit to you x our relatedness

199
Q

What is the sibling rivalry problem?

A

Share 100% DNA with ourself and only 50% with sibling, so we will prioritise getting benefits for ourself over sibling unless this is no longer useful for us

200
Q

What is the auntie problem?

A
  • More investment given to brother’s kids than brother - why?
    Brother won’t have any more kids but his kids will grow up and have children
201
Q

What evidence supports Hamilton’s rule of kin selection?

A
  • Vignettes (moral problems - choosing between people to save)
    Real life:
  • Fire at vacation complex (Sime 1983) - analysis of escape behaviour at Summerland, Isle of Man, 1973. 50 of 3000 guests died
    Families more likely to find each other to get out, friends more likely to get themselves out - people spend longer in a burning building for family members than for friends
  • Live organ donation to close family members over non-family members (kidney, bone marrow) (Borgida et al 1992)
202
Q

What did Burnstein et al (1994) find out about preferential helping of relatives in trouble?

A

High genetic relatedness - willingness to help was higher when it was life or death matter

203
Q

Are people more likely to favour romantic partner or family in a dangerous situation? (Blasi, 2022)

A
  • People more likely to favour offspring and sibling over romantic partner, people more likely to favour romantic partner over cousin, women more likely to favour kin than men
  • Favour relative regardless of age
204
Q

What did Belin et al (2023) find out about survival advantage in the Holocaust?

A
  • More former campmates, more members of chainmail letter group, part of same Jewish regional grouping, part of same transit to Auschwitz - more likely to survive
205
Q

What is Trivers’ (1971) theory of reciprocal altruism?

A
  • Delayed ‘payback’ of altruistic acts where
  • Benefit to recipient high (e.g. parasites removed)
  • Cost to donor low (e.g. grooming)
  • Likelihood that positions will be reversed in future
206
Q

What are necessary conditions of reciprocal altruism?

A
  • Social species
  • Stable groups
  • Good face recognition
  • Good long term memory
  • Non-cooperation with or punishment of defectors
  • As long as we punish defectors, it is difficult for non-cooperators to become the majority
207
Q

What is the prisoner’s dilemma?

A

‘If you confess and your partner does not, you are free and your partner gets 10 years’
‘If both confess, you each get 3 years’
‘If neither confesses, we will put you both away on a lesser charge for a year’
‘Same offer is being made to your partner’

208
Q

What is the best strategy for the prisoner’s dilemma? (Short term losses)

A
  • Your partner has realised the same thing as you, hence both behave selfishly and get a mutually bad outcome
  • The game is ‘non-zero sum’
    i.e. both players can benefit if they choose to cooperate, if they had both co-operated they would both have benefitted
  • Cooperation is the best strategy
209
Q

What is the best strategy for iterated games? (The long haul) (Axelrod, 1984 - PD program)

A

The Evolution of Cooperation, Iterated PD program ‘competition’
- Tit-for-tat - cooperate on the 1st move, subsequently respond in kind (if they cheat you after this, you cheat them back)
- But unintended betrayal triggers endless round of defections so…
- Generous Tit-for-Tat - cooperate on the first move, subsequently respond in kind, cooperate on 1/3 defections after (Nowak and Sigmund, 1992, Nature)

210
Q

What is frequency dependency and why is Generous tit for tat the best strategy? (Hawks vs doves)

A

Although GT4T may be good overall, a small number of cheaters can benefit from its generosity
- Common analogy: Hawks vs Doves:
- Hawks in a Dove’s world do well vs Doves in a Hawk’s world do not
- Hawks cheat, doves do not
- Can one population be ‘taken over’ by another?
- No - too many hawks - everyone is cheating and it becomes non-profitable, doves can’t take over hawks world as there are not enough of them to find each other
- GT4T is a good Evolutionary Stable Strategy (ESS)

211
Q

What does Trivers say about the emotional mediation of altruism?

A
  • Someone helping you - obligation and gratitude
  • Not paying back - guilt
  • If someone does not help you back - anger modulates behaviour to not help them again going forward
    Positive mood enhances likelihood of helping behaviour
212
Q

How is RA shown in primate grooming?

A
  • Enjoy endorphins from grooming
  • Remove parasites from each other
    RA in primates because of reciprocal grooming
213
Q

How do humans engage in social enforcement in reciprocity? (Fehr & Gachter, 2002)

A

Public goods game for money - competitive altruism and reputation
People willing to take a financial hit themselves in order to punish someone for not paying their own fair share
Reputational benefits will come back to them in other ways than cheating people for money
Publicity involved in giving money to charity - fuels reputation

214
Q

What are examples of real life frequency dependency?

A

Vaccinations - group at whole less at risk if everyone gets vaccinated
Collective action only works if enough people engage in them e.g. strike action

215
Q

How do evolutionary and social explanations of altruism differ?

A
  • EP: Why are we altruistic as a species? What patterns might we therefore expect?
    Kin - not reciprocity, everyone else - reciprocity
  • SP: What cognitive mechanisms underlie altruistic behaviour? What social scenarios are most associated with it?
  • EP gives ultimate causation, SP gives proximate causation

1 - Social and Developmental (4 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions