Smoking & ADHD - Kate Langley Flashcards

1
Q

Aim

A

Does Smoking cause ADHD in foetuses?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Procedure (1st study)

A
  • Observational
  • Looking at 800 Mothers who smoke & if their kids have ADHD symptoms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Second Study

A
  • Hyp: Sig association when mums smoke but not dads, comparing maternal/paternal risk
  • Paternal should not matter as he’s not pregnant
  • Large longitudinal study (large N)
  • Split into mothers & fathers
  • Split into smokers/non-smokers during pregnancy
  • Looked at ADHD symptoms in kids
  • Regression analysis (controls confounders)

Results:
- No diff regardless of which parent smoked, risk of ADHD was no different
- Also shows passive smoking is no risk so it cannot be causal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Procedure (Additional Designs)

A
  • Comparing ADHD in siblings where mum smoked in one pregnancy but not the other: risk was same for sibs
  • Kids born through IVF: where mum is unrelated to kid. ADHD present if bio mum carries
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Conclusion

A
  • Smoking is not causal to ADHD development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Limitations:

A

1st study:
- No manipulation if observational
- Correlation is not causation

Testing causality:
- Normal designs can’t identify causality or confounders
- Natural experiments: lack of control = causation hard to find, also have to rely on circumstances

Second Study:
- Questionnaires sent: sample bias
- Interviews: prone to bias
- Tests on children: ethics questioned as well as reliability (liar)
- Memory: detoriates
- Measuring symptoms of ADHD how? Valid?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Positives

A
  • Natural experiment = higher EV, remove something in the pathway, experience things they would see in the Lab, more Mundane Realism
  • School reports: non-biased view
  • Interviews: rich detailed data
  • Longitudinal study
  • Ideas of different/flexible methodology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly