Small bodied hominins Flashcards
How old is the Homo floresiensis material?
cc?
How tall?
From Flores, Indonesia – 60-100kya
417cc,
106cm tall
What are the key features of the Homo floresiensis skull
Short, orthognatic face Gracile supraorbital torus Thicker cranial vault bones than Australopithecus, ~ to Homo Small post‐canine dentition No chin M1 = M2 in size
What is strange about the P3 of Homo floresiensis?
very large
Longer AP than basolaterally – unseen before
Size and weight of floresiensis
106cm, 30kg
- Comment on the robusticity of Homo floresiensis jaw:
Very robust for its body size – seen in corpus and symphyseal robustity
What are the derived/ humanlike bipedal traits of H floresiensis
• Hallux: adducted
• Arches: plantar
Efficient biped
Primitive traits found throughout skeleton
What are the unique bipedal traits of floresiensis
• Proportions of the foot: clusters with chimps
• Foot length to body size: ditto
foot almost as long as lower leg
• Pace: could walk but NOT run (inside of arch, and no spring‐like
mechanism)
Did H floresiensis make tools
Made stone tools
• Similar to ~800 Ka tools at Mata Menge site in Flores and possibly 1050 Ka Wolo
Sege site?
• Hunted dwarfed elephants (Stegodon) and giant varanid lizards (Komodo dragon)
• Stegodon: 1st recorded at Wolo Sege
When did H floresiensis go extinct
What happens in Flores after this
46kya
youngest H. floresiensis bone remains in the cave date to 60kya, and the youngest stone tools to 50kya, similar time to arrival of modern humans - ‘smoking gun’ (Roberts, 2016) for human-floresiensis competition, but haven’t ‘found the bullet’
giant birds and stegodon probably went extinct at same time
There is a gap in the stratigraphy and then stone tools appear – appearance of modern humans – were they associated with modern humans
What are the different options for what floresiensis is (5)
- Pygmy H. erectus
- Microcephalic pathological modern human
- H. habilis
- Australopithecine
- None of the above
What is the evidence that Homo floresiensis not a different hominin, but a pathological population
stature is within the range of modern humans with Laron Syndrome
short, slightly prognathic also charactersitic of LS and GH deficiency. under-developed chin is also symptom of LS - all seen in floresiensis
LS patients are also known to manifest abnormal body proportion, which is expressed by disproportionately short legs relative to the upper trunk, resulting in an abnormal upper/lower body ratio, as seen in floresiensis
floresiensis has LS due to inbreeding on island of flores?
(Hershkovitz, 2007)
What is Laron Syndrome
primary or classical GH insensitiv-ity or resistance)
What derived features does floresiensis’ brain show
caudally-positioned occipital lobe,
lack of a rostrally-located lunate sulcus,
an expanded orbitofrontal cortex.
These features indicate that LB1’s brain was globally reorganized despite its ape-sized cranial capacity (417 cm3)
What does Falk say about floresiensis being microcephalic
although the combination of primitive and derived features seen in LB1’s virtual endocast is unique, none of them appear pathological and the most dramatic features (expanded caudal temporal lobes and expanded prefrontal cortices) appear in just those parts of the brain that have recently been recognized as foci of differential selection during the course of human evolution
If Homo floresiensis were a “dwarfed” human weighing 30 kg, its predicted brain size should be 1100 cc.
What does Baab say about floresiensis having Down Syndrome
1) often DS symptoms affect soft tissue that cannot be assessed in skeletons
2) features that can be assessed are not present in LB1 eg narrow palate (foudnd in 2/3 humans with DS )
3) the low and poorly filled out cranial vault of LB1 contrasts sharply with samples of both DS and euploid modern humans who are themselves quite similar, and is more similar to H. erectus
Give for and against floresiensis being an australopith
a. For: too many primitive features – foot v different to those footprints from 1.5mya)
b. Against: but no fossils from this time in SE Asia reflect this – depends if the fossils are all classed as erectus