Homo Flashcards
What new evidence has come to light regarding the age of the oldest Homo Sapiens fossils in Africa
found in Omo-Kibish and Herto, Ethiopia, dating of deposites from an eruption of the Shala volcano, which overlies the fossils, shows a new minimum age to be 233+/-22kya
(Vidal et al. 2022)
Describe the juvenile pelvis of H naledi
showed incipient development of features expressed inadultH. nalediilia. The proportional height of the Lesedi ilium was within the rangeof human juveniles between 4–11 years of age
australopith-like iliac blade morphology
expanded auricular surface more similar to humans
Where have Homo erectus fossils been found
Europe (AKA Homo antecessor) between 1.6 and 0.5Mya
West Asia (georgicus) 2-1.6mya
Africa (ergaster) 2-0.7mya
E Asia - 2-0.4mya
SE Asia - 1.5-0.2mya
Who first defined H erectus
What was important about this fossil
Dubois based on fossil from Java
Large cc (950cc) from 0.5mya
How long could erectus have lived in Java
Oldest found in Sangiran ad is 1.6-1.3Ma
Youngest could be as young as 0.1Ma
Survived for 1.5My
What is the problem with fossils found in Sangiran
Sangiran hard to date cos often found and moved by farmers
How does erectus molars differ from habilis molars
in erectus M3 is reduced compared to the very large M3 of habilis
Describe the evolutionary trends in Javan Homo erectus morphology.
Early – many primitive features, large teeth, narrow dental arcade
Later – larger in cc, frontal less flat, AP extended cranial base, short temporal muscle attachment
How old is the Ngandong erectus material?
key features?
found along river so can be hard to date - Riza 2020 suggests ~110kya
CC:1132cc
Flat horiztontal orbital torus
Dubois found 2 femora and a calotte in Java which were all claimed to be erectus. Why is this doubted?
Trinil I femur is much closer to a late Pleistocene H. sapiens morphology (therefore not used in erectus analyses)
Trinil II is likely contemporaneous with the calotte and both are erectus
What is Meganthropus
Dubois’ paratype of Pithecanthropus erectus from 1891 NOT HOMININ BUT APE(S), probably related to Lufengpithecus, and possibly including Gigantopithecus
Give some typical erectus features of the fossils in Sangiran
Large SO torus with supratoral sulcus
Long receding forehead
bregmatic eminence
Large face, with reduced alveolar prognathism
Salient nasal bones
Where were key erectus fossils found in 1920s and 30s
How old?
China
The fossils from Zhoukoudian, China were lost during WWII
Estimated age: 780 – 400 Ka
How does the Zhoukoudian erectus material differ from that of Java? (3)
- Size: 915-1225cc (upper is almost sapiens)
- Forehead: not receding – arched and curved – allometry?
- Sagittal keel: much less pronounced
Why is the material from Hexian interesting?
V young – 400ky
Affinities to early java material – more similar to older erectus – survival of more primitive erectus in some parts of china
Some dental (EDJ) affinities to early African Homo
What is the temporal pattern of Homo erectus occupation of Asia? What questions does it raise?
Early Pleistocene has fossils and stone tools but then large temporal gap – repopulation?
Fossils in Africa from ~2mya classed as erectus but that species is based off Dubois’ skull cap from ~0.5mya in SE Asia – surely there had been selective pressures etc – problems here
What is the type specimen of ergaster
KNM-ER 992 from Koobi Fora (1.7ma)
mandible with no retromolar space and a slender corpus
What is the retromolar space
The retromolar space or retromolar gap is a space at the rear of the mandible, between the back of the last molar and the anterior edge of the ascending ramus where it crosses the alveolar margin.
This gap is generally small or absent in modern humans, but it was more often present in Neanderthals
Not seen in ergaster but is in erectus and earlier hominins
What is the importance of the Turkana boy
first humanlike narrow skeleton (90%) complete
How old was the Turkana boy
8‐9 years old [developmental stage equivalent to a human 12 year old child]
What were the key features of the Turkana boy (4)
Resembles a very robust modern human from
the neck down
Brachial and humero‐femoral index in the
modern human range
Barrel‐shaped rib‐cage
Narrow bi-iliac breadth
What is interesting about KNM-ER 42700?
East African H erectus
Young adult – not fully fused synchondrosis
Mosaic – projecting glabella, distinct keels, no occipital torus, rounded back, max length at lambda, modern arrangement: tympanic bones orientated coronally(?) while petrous bones are sagittally
Thin bones in skull while erectus has thick bones – no prominent SO torus or trigones – outside range of erectus? But not habilis either
What was the range of cc in E African erectus
from 691 cc (KNM‐ER 42700) to 1067 cc (OH 9)
How does E African occipital compare to that of non-African erectus
Occipital: less angular than in non‐African Homo erectus (except OH9)
What is important about the Buia and Bouri skulls?
Very different skulls but contemporaneous (1mya)
Bouri has the most features shared with later Middle Pleistocene hominins
Regardless of whether we classify them as populations of the same species or separate species, what can we learn from the mosaics of traits seen in different groups of “erectus”?
Tall, slender body, with narrow shoulders, barrel‐shaped rib‐cage, narrow pelvis, legs longer than arms
Larger cranial capacity than Homo habilis
Why is StW 53 interesting
has been classified as Homo, Au. africanus, and P. robustus
existed 1.78‐1.49 Ma
• Small cc
• Large teeth
• M3 > M2
What is the temporal distribution of African H erectus
Homo ergaster
2-0.8mya
What evidence is there of regional erectus fossils being different species
morphometric studies show:
The frontal bone of African “erectus” fossils is different
The parietal bones of African “erectus” fossils are different
The occipital bone of African “erectus” is similar to Chinese “erectus”, but not Javanese erectus fossils
Different skull bones are different in ‘erectus’ from different regions – different trajectories?
Compare erectus and ergaster (8)
ergaster has thinner cranial bones No sagittal keel No bregmatic eminence More pronounced supratoral sulcus Less developed supraorbital torus Less developed occipital torus Slender mandibles Relatively gracile TMJ
What does Homo erectus sensu lato include
- All post‐habiline hominins prior to major brain enlargement in the Middle Pleistocene
- Widely distributed in Asia and Africa
- 2.0 – 0.1 Ma
What is Homo erectus sensu stricto
Javanese fossils only, perhaps
including East Asian remains
• >1.6 Ma – 0.1 Ma
What is H ergaster
African lineage only • Ancestral to H. erectus ? • 2.0 – 1.0 Ma • Less specialized features • Very variable
What does a) the fossil evidence and b) lithic evidence suggest about when hominins first left Africa
a) Crania from Dmanisi, Georgia ~1.77Ma
Longgudong - >2.14ma?
b) Stone tools from Southern China 2.12Ma – only 17 artefacts
N India – 2.6Ma
Indication but not substantial but does suggest OoA 2-3ky earlier than fossils suggest
Who was the first hominin in Georgia
How long were they there
Did they have tools
What was the cranial capacity of these hominins
Homo georgicus (Georgian Homo erectus)
1.77 Ma (fossils)
• ~ 100,000 years of occupation of the site
(from ~1.85 Ma)
Oldowan artefacts (Mode 1)
Small cranial capacity: 546 cc to 730 cc - lots of variety
• D4500: 546 cc (EQ ~ Australopithecus)
What can we infer about the behaviour of Homo georgicus (Georgian Homo erectus)
toothless individual 9D3444/D3900) would not have had easy access to food so must have been looked after
o Paramasticatory use of anterior dentition of D2600 – teeth worn labially – used to hold objects
o Lateral extension of body of mandible near molars – typical of early hominins absent in ergaster and later Homo
What was the face shape of H georgicus
Zygomatics?
Prognathic – could be part of developmental process as D4500 has most pronounced cf D2282 and D2700 which are both not fully developed (adolescent and juvenile respectively) - same can be said for the supraorbital torus
Flared zygomatics cf not flaring in erectus
Less angular head – more similar to ergaster
What did Lordkipanidze et al. (2013) suggest about taxic diversity of early Homo, based on Dmanisi?
Early homo out of Africa were very diverse and should be considered as a single highly variable species
This implies the existence of a single evolving lineage of early Homo, with phylogeographic continuity across continents.
- What might the link between A.L. 666, SK847, and Dmanisi?
Similar shape of subnasal clavus and maxillary pillars and angle of zygomatics which are slightly flared – possible association
This would put Dmanisi material as descent from fossils in Africa that predate erectus or ergaster
Which species has the most similar body proportions to the Dmanisi postcrania
H sapiens
What are the derived traits of Homo georgicus (Georgian Homo erectus)
• Biomechanically efficient locomotion, both for long‐range walking and energy
storage/return during running
Leg length and morphology similar to modern humans
Adducted hallux and plantar arch
Homo georgicus (Georgian Homo erectus) is a mosaic. What are the primitive features
Retention of primitive characters not seen in later hominins More medial orientation of the foot Absence of humeral torsion Small body size Low encephalisation quotient (EQ)
Why may the Dmanisi hominins not be a single species
Significant differences between individuals • Significantly larger size variation than in humans • Significantly larger shape variation that any extant ape species
Established early in ontogeny
Independent of size or sexual dimorphism
Not synchronic deposition of fossils
2 different palaeodemes?
a) What is the oldest hominin fossil out of Africa
b) Oldest sites with stone tools or cut‐marks on fauna
a) Longgudong, China (>2.14 Ma? controversial)
Otherwise, Dmanisi, Georgia, W Asia 1.77 Ma
b) Quranwala, Siwaliks, N India 2.6 Ma (controversial)
When was there faunal exchange 1.5-2.5mya
2.6 – 2.5 Ma: Afro‐Eurasian faunal exchange
Africa->Eurasia: Giraffa, Struthio
Eurasia->N. Africa: Ursus
Eurasia->Sub-Saharan Africa: equus
1.8 – 1.6 Ma: important Afro‐Eurasian faunal exchange (mostly out of Africa) - carnivores, primates, hippos
From Eurasia to Africa: wolves
What is the significance of the faunal exchange 1.5-2.5mya
• 1.8-1.6 Ma: out of Africa mostly – main point of dispersal
Why does it matter? – hippos are v water dependent like humans so not only was there a corridor but also fresh water was available
What might the relationship between hominins and carnivores have been? Why does this matter for dispersals?
Used same range bc humans acted as scavengers utilizing the carcasses left behind by giant carnivores
Why might the earlier dispersal (2.5mya) only have been a limited dispersal?
Were exchanges of fauna but limited – no archaeology
Did not colonise Maghreb(?) (Western N Africa) and Nile was not strong corridor of water to support the dispersal
Why do researchers suggest that ATD6-69 might be the LCA of Neanderthals and modern humans?
Sima del Elephante - maxilla of child 1.2Ma – LCA of neanderthals – v controversial
Intersection of Zygoma and maxillary has sharp depression – typical of early humans
Why in spain? – recurrent connection with Africa through middle east? – maybe just part of erectus diversity
What do proteomes tell us about Homo antecessor?
Antecessor’s ancient proteomic data (small sample size) suggests it is the sister group of sapiens
Describe Model 1 of the dispersals of early Homo out of Africa
MODEL 1 – one single dispersal early (2.5‐2.2 Ma)
Early dispersal of early Homo; tethered to highlands? (stone; water)
Giving rise to Homo georgicus and a population ancestral to Homo erectus in eastern Asia
Describe Model 2a of the dispersals of early Homo out of Africa
Main dispersal at 19‐1.8 Ma
[either no early dispersal, or extinction of those very early Asian populations]
Dispersal of early Homo, giving rise to Homo georgicus (and later European pops., including H antecessor) and ancestor of
Homo erectus in East Asia
1.6 ‐ 0.8 Ma EMPT
Regional isolation in Asia
Expansion in Europe
When did H erectus live?
What happened during this time to this species?
2-0.1mya
it regionalised, acquiring local differences due to different pressure in each local environment, as well as due to founder effects and drift
Many researchers argue that erectus differences should be recognized taxonomically, and several local populations have been given species names:
ergaster to the African fossils
georgicus to the Dmanisi fossils
antecessor to the fossils from Spain
erectus to the Javan and Chinese populations
What are the key features of erectus’ skull
what ergaster does not have
thick cranial bones (not ergaster), angled occipital (variable), with strong
superstructures, including a sagittal keel (not ergaster) and a pronounced
supraorbital torus
With which early members of Homo did the erectus group overlap temporally? And what about members of other hominin genera?
Rudolfensis and habilis
Boisei
How does the cranial capacity of erectus vary
546-1250cc
What are the body proportions of erectus
1.3-1.7m
Modern proportions
KNM-WT – share proportions of most recent Homo and v different from habilis and Lucy
Erectus achieved greater stature earlier on than modern humans