SLT eating beh Flashcards

1
Q

what is SLT

A

proposed by bandura, 4 mediational processes
Attention (pay attention to the eating behaviour of a role model)
Retention (observed eating behaviour must be remembered for later imitation)
Reproduction (ability to reproduce the observed behaviour)
Motivation (must be motivated to imitate the eating behaviour)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what 2 things is this motivated by

A

direct abd vicarious reinforcemnt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

whats VR

A

Seeing the role model rewarded (e.g. a parent being praised for eating healthily or a peer gaining popularity for bringing trendy snacks)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

whats DR

A

Receiving praise or rewards for imitating the behaviour (e.g. compliments for choosing a healthy meal).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what may this be also motivated by

A

positive rienforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

whats the first one

A

Adding a pleasant stimulus after a behavior to increase the likelihood of that behavior happening again.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

whats a worked example- child eating veggies one

A

A child observes a sibling eating a new vegetable and receiving praise (attention).
They remember how the sibling prepared and ate the vegetable (retention).
Later, the child attempts to eat the same vegetable (reproduction).
If they are praised or see positive outcomes, they are motivated to continue the behaviour (motivation).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

whats one other influence of slt for kids

A

media

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how

A

Children become more independent of parents but see role models of television. TV adverts often have fun themes with role models.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are 2 strengths

A

empirical evidence
theory can explain why certain food are more preferred by younger impressionable children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

whats evidence for the first point

A

experimentally manipulated the influence of social learning upon food preferences finding increase of 84% between social learning and future food choices. reinforced by field experiments, Hare-Bruun  larger scale real world longitudinal study. relationship between food choices and the consumption of healthy or unhealthy advertising

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what can be concluded from this

A

credible and trustworthy body of evidence that offers powerful support for SLT. Shows a direct causal link between social learning and food preferences and that observational learning directly influences behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

who studied the second eval point about children being influence

A

Janson + Tenney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what they do/find

A

gave children an energy dense or energy dilute yogurt drink, found most preferred energy dense drink taken at the same time as teacher who was also having the drink and praised the drink showing clear signs of enjoyment (VR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what can we conclude from this

A

shows the impact of both social and environmental factors. reinforces SLT’s validity and applicability in explaining how eating behaviours are shaped, particularly in younger, impressionable individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are 2 weaknesses

A

doesn’t account for individual differences
environmentally reductionist

17
Q

who provided evidence for the first weakness

A

Chen + Yang

18
Q

what did they find

A

researched food preferences made by people over Twitter and found a significant association between healthy food choices and the number of grocery stores around but no association between number of fast food outlets and healthy/unhealthy choices.

19
Q

what can be concluded from this

A

by focusing primarily on observation and imitation, SLT overlooks contextual factors, weakens explanatory power. Reduces applicability to real-world eating behaviours. This may shape behaviour more.
SLT cannot fully account for the complex and multifaceted influences on dietary choices.

20
Q

who provided evidence that is it environmentally reductionist

21
Q

what did he find

A

56% (11x) concordance rate for mz twins for AN

22
Q

what can we conclude from this

A

fails to consider bio and psyc explanations- decreases generalizability and applicability- needs a more holistic approach- doesn’t consider range of necessary influences