Slides & Exam Flashcards

1
Q

Fourth Amendment

A

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fourth Amendment: Remedies

A

a) Civil Suit
b) Criminal Complaint
c) Admin complaint (e.g., to police department)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dog Sniffs and Searches

A

No REP = No “Search”

No REP in possession of contraband since, by definition, it is illegal to possess contraband.

Dog sniff only reveals existence of contraband, thus no search.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can dogs sniff inside of car?

A

A canine sniff that migrates from outside a car or other container to the interior does not constitute a violation of the 4th, so long as the canine makes entry into the suspect vehicle OF ITS OWN INITIATIVE and is neither ENCOURAGED or PLACED in by officers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When do people have REP in garbage can?

A

When it is within curtilage of their home/on their property.

Only when it is out on the curb is the REP lost.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Illegal vs. Unconstitutional

A

State statutes and laws may be created that go above and beyond the constitution, but this does not mean they change the constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Is evidence admissible in Federal Court if it was obtained by violating State Law?

A

Yes, so long as it wasn’t obtained in violation of the constitution or federal law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

REP in not having bags touched on a bus?

A

No. But if squeezed and manipulated, yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Probable cause is…

A

Articulable information and logical inferences from that information which show that:

1) It is more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that there is a fair probability that…
2) The evidence sought exists at the place named in the search warrant, OR
3) The suspect named in the arrest warrant has committed a crime

Probable cause is more than a “hunch,” “gut feeling,” or “reasonable suspicion.” But less than proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Is reasonable suspicion sufficient for probable cause?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Probable Cause for search:

A

Evidence shows connection between crime and the place and items searched (no need to address who specifically is present)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Probable cause for arrest:

A

Evidence shows connection between crime and specific person (no need to address specific place or items)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is “Safe Harbor”

A

When a search is based upon a magistrate’s (rather than a police officer’s) determination of probable case, the reviewing courts will accept evidence of a less “judicially competent or persuasive character than would have justified an officer in acting on his own without a warrant,” and will sustain the judicial determination so long as “there was substantial basis for the magistrate to conclude that narcotics were probable present.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Probable Cause for Administrative Searches?

A

Health inspections and minimally intrusive searches are considered less demanding of PC.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How much PC for taking blood in DUI arrest?

A

Since it is a more offensive type of search, it requires a “clear indication that in fact such evidence will be found.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Probable Cause Rules of Thumb

A

1) PC requires the supporting facts suggest a fairly narrow range of possibilities, .e.g., descriptions fitting large numbers of people or a large segment of the community does not create PC.
2) PC allows for supporting facts with some uncertainty about whom the perpetrator of the crime is, but not uncertainty as to whether any crime has occurred.
3) PC does not allow for an arrest and search based on supporting facts as consistent with innocent activity as criminal activity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Gates approach to Informants:

A

“Totality-of-circumstances” test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Totality of Circumstances Test

A

Gates test.

Example:

  1. Anonymous tip
  2. But highly detailed
  3. Mostly innocent facts and allegation of drug trafficking
  4. Innocent, predictive facts were corroborated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Elements of a Valid Search Warrant

A
  1. Probable Cause
  2. Affidavit: “Oath of Affirmation” (affidavit under oath alleging facts, not conclusions)
  3. Neutral magistrate requirement (Warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate)
  4. Particularity requirement (A search warrant, and not just the affidavit, must describe with REASONABLE CERTAINTY the location to be searched and the things to be seized.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Exceptions to the Particularity requirement of a valid search warrant:

A
  1. Reasonable error in the description

2. Plain view

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Who is a “magistrate”

A

Need not be a judge or even a lawyer; must only meet 2 requirements:

  1. Neutral and detached
  2. Capable of determining whether probable cause exists for the requested arrest or search.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

When can an officer arrest without a warrant?

A

So long as the officer has probable cause:

  1. For any felony
  2. For a misdemeanor committed in his presence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What does “reasonable ground” and “reasonable cause” mean today?

A

Probable cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Are warrantless arrests in public permissible?

A

Yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

How can officers enter a suspect’s home to arrest a suspect?

A

If officers have grounds to believe suspect is inside a residence, then an ARREST WARRANT will support entry to arrest them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

How can officer’s enter a 3rd party home to arrest a suspect?

A

Absent EXIGENT circumstances or CONSENT, officer cannot legally search for the subject of an arrest warrant in the home of a third party without obtaining a SEARCH WARRANT based on showing that subject of the ARREST WARRANT is inside the third party’s home.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

How far can police enter a home without a warrant and absent exigent circumstances?

A

Police may not cross threshold of home.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Is a warrant valid if it directs the search of all persons found within a specific place?

A

No – must identify individuals to be searched with more particularity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Is a warrant valid if it is missing info or has erroneous info?

A

Yes, so long as other known facts or reasonable inferences clarify the warrant and make it possible to identify a particular house, item, or person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Standard for Particularity re: Items

A

Warrant must be sufficiently definite so that the officer executing it can identify the property sought with reasonable certainty

31
Q

How must Police execute warrants?

A

Police must knock and announce their authority and purpose unless they have reasonable suspicion based on facts specific to the particular case that knocking and announcing would be dangerous or futile, or that it would inhibit the investigation (e.g. it would lead to the destruction of evidence).

32
Q

Does failure to knock and announce result in the exclusion of evidence?

A

No

33
Q

Can police execute a warrant with other parties?

A

No, unless 3rd party assistance is necessary.

34
Q

During execution of a warrant, can persons on the premises by fully searched?

A

No, but they may be detained and/or Terry frisked.

35
Q

What is a “Protective Sweep”

A

Cursory inspection of places where a person may hide, last no longer than is necessary to dispel reasonable suspicion of danger.

A full sweep of entire house requires special justification.

36
Q

Can a search warrant be performed on a home at night?

A

No, not without special reasons.

37
Q

What is the “Police-Created Exigency Doctrine”

A

Exigency created or manufactured by the conduct of the police do not justify warrantless search.

38
Q

Test for Police-Created Exigency Doctrine

A

Warrantless entry based on exigent circumstances is reasonable when police did not create the exigency by engaging or threatening to engage in conduct violating the Fourth Amendment.

39
Q

Case: Carroll

A

Right to search moveable vehicle in public area if probable cause

40
Q

Case: Chadwick (And Sanders)

A

Held unconstitutional the search of closed containers during automobile searches

41
Q

Case: Ross

A

PC search of vehicle is just as extensive as a search with warrant

42
Q

Case: Acevedo

A

With PC for bag in a car, police can seize and search container, even if no PC for the search of the car.

43
Q

Case: Mimms

A

For officer safety, the driver may be compelled to get out of the car, even on a minor traffic violation.

44
Q

Case: Wilson

A

If officers make valid traffic stop, they can require everybody get out of the car for safety.

45
Q

Case: Whren

A

No problem with “pretextual stops.” The only question is whether the officer has the objective right to stop the motorist for a traffic violation, regardless of any other agendas of the officer.

46
Q

Can police conduct warrantless search of an automobile and the containers within it?

A

Yes, but if police only had PC to search a container in the automobile, the police first must obtain warrant to search container.

47
Q

Current rule re: Automobile Searches?

A

The police may search an automobile and the containers within it where they have probable cause to believe contraband or evidence is contained.

48
Q

What is the Horton test?

A

Test for Plain View

49
Q

What are the three-prongs of the Horton test?

A

1) Officer is lawfully present where the evidence can be plainly viewed
2) Officer has lawful right of access to the object, and
3) Incriminating character of the object is “immediately apparent.”

50
Q

Re: Plain-view, can officers manipulate item for better view/smell/etc?

A

No

51
Q

Planview = immediate sense of Perception, such as:

A

Plain View
Plain Smell
Plain Hear
Plain Feel

52
Q

What is a “Chimel Search”

A

A search justified as incidental to the arrest

53
Q

Does a car parked in a driveway fall under the Carroll exigency?

A

No; only applies to cars on public road.

54
Q

When can an officer temporarily detain someone?

A

When the officer has reasonable, articulable suspicion that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime.

55
Q

Chimel search of car

A

When an officer has made a lawful arrest of the occupant of a vehicle, the officer may make a search of the passenger compartment.

56
Q

Where the occupant of a car was recently in the vehicle but is now outside the vehicle, a search incident to a recent occupant’s arrest is constitutional when:

A

(1) The arrestee is within reaching distance of the vehicle during the search, or
(2) The police have reason to believe that the vehicle contains “evidence relevant to the crime of the arrest” (Gant)

57
Q

What is an “inventory search” ?

A

An inventory of a car lawfully in police custody may be justifiable if part of a “routine” procedure and is not primarily related to a criminal investigation and there is no significant discretion to an individual officer.

58
Q

What is the “co-occupant consent rule”

A

Consent by third party who possesses common authority over property is valid against defendant who does not refuse consent.

HOWEVER – does NOT apply when DF is present and objects to the search.

59
Q

What is a “terry frisk” on a car?

A

The search of the passenger compartment of a car is limited to those areas in which a weapon may be placed or hidden, so long as the police possess a reasonable belief based on specific and articulable facts which, taken together with the rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant the officer to believe that the suspect is dangerous and the suspect may gain immediate control of weapons.

60
Q

Terry Frisk + Plain Feel

A

If it starts as legitimate frisk for weapons, but then officer feels (and immediately recognizes) contraband based on its contours or mass, it is okay.

61
Q

What does custodial interrogation require?

A

Probable Cause or Consent

62
Q

Can a terry stop with reasonable suspicion justify custodial interrogation?

A

No

63
Q

What is the Dunaway Warning?

A

“We’d like for you to come with us in our car to the station house to discuss what happened here today. You’re not under arrest, and you don’t have to come with us if you don’t want to. You’re free to walk away from here at this time without saying anything more if you wish to do so.”

64
Q

What is another term for “Seizure”?

A

Custody

65
Q

What is another term for “Custody”?

A

Seizure

66
Q

Mendenhall standard of Seizure/Custody:

A

In view of all the circumstances surrounding the incident, a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave.

67
Q

If a cop chases a suspect, is the suspect seized?

A

No. Not seized until tackled.

68
Q

When are Protective Sweeps ok?

A

When a searching officer possesses reasonable belief based on specific and articulable facts that the area to be swept harbors individual(s) posing a danger to those on arrest scene.

69
Q

What is a “protective sweep”?

A

A quick and limited search of premises, incident to an arrest and conducted to protect the safety of police officers or others. It is narrowly confined to a cursory visual inspection of those places in which A PERSON might be hiding.

70
Q

What does “reasonable suspicion” allow?

A

Terry: Stop and frisk of a person

Long: Frisk of a car

Buie: Protective sweep of house

71
Q

When are warrantless, suspicionless searches ok?

A

Governmental search or seizure w/o individualized suspicion are reasonable where the program is designed to serve “special needs, beyond the normal need for law enforcement” or as part of a program for administrative inspection.

72
Q

When is something “reasonable”? (Balancing Test)

A

When you balance intrusion vs. government interest/purpose.

73
Q

When is supicionless drug testing okay?

A

Where there is a “special need” for it beyond ordinary law enforcement, and the need has to be “substantial” (not just symbolic), and the testing is reasonable (re: balancing test).

74
Q

Exceptions to Exclusionary Rule:

A

(1) Inevitable Discovery
(2) Independent source
(3) Attenuation
(4) Free Will confession
(5) 4rd Party Witness’s statement
(6) Identification exception – improper seizure of defendant to assist in identifying the victim