slavery Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Explain state v. Post

A

NJ statute declared every child born after July 4, 1804, free but remain servant of the owner of the mother until reaching a certain age.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Holding of State v. Post

A

this did not abolish slavery. If they had intended to do that - it would have been crystal clear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain Dred Scott v. Sandford

A

Owner took him to a ton of free states and Scott claimed he was free because he was in those states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Holding of Dred Scott

A

Black people are not citizens and cannot claim any of the rights of citizens of the US.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain Plessy v. Ferguson

A

LA statute required railroad companies to provide separate but equal accomodations for white and black races. Man sits on white can and won’t get off.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What basis of review in Plessy

A

Rational Basis review with bite

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Holding in Plessy

A

UPHOLDS statute = court cannot say that law which requires separation of two races in public conveyances is unreasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Harlan Dissent in Plessy

A

If you don’t grant social equality we will never have a color blind institution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada

A

All white law school and sent black students out of state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Holding in Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada

A

VIOLATED equal protection clause. Don’t have to admit black students but must maintan and build equal facility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain Sweatt v. Painter

A

Black student not allowed to attend white law school. Facilities separate but not equal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Holding on Sweatt v. Painter

A

Ordered admission of black student to white schools. Certain intangibles that exist in law school cannot be reciprocated organically elsewhere.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain McLaurin v. OK

A

admitted student to all white school but sat in special black classroom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Holding of Mclaurin v. OK

A

Restrictions impaired his ability to study, engage and learn with other students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain Brown I

A

Black children are seeking admission to the public schools of their community on a non segregated basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Holding of Brown

A

separate but equal has no place in education.

17
Q

What amendment was Brown brought under and why

A

14th amendment

18
Q

Explain Bolling v. Sharpe

A

student attempted to enroll in all white DC school and they said no

19
Q

What amendment did Bolling rely on

A

5th amendment and used reverse incorporation EPC to apply to federal government

20
Q

holding of Brown II

A

all schools have to make a good faith effort to admit students in a non racial way with all deliberate speed. Judge determines whether school district has followed the plan.

21
Q

Explain green v. county school board

A

plan to divide county in two to create integrate schools. Students had option to switch schools but no white students would go to the black school

22
Q

Holding in Green

A

not enough deliberate speed. Plan was not effective to achieve the unitary school system

23
Q

Explain Swann v. Charlotte

A

Race conscious plan which took race into account when drawing up school zones

24
Q

holding of Swann

A

ok to use race conscious policy. Once school meets requirement then they will lift the requirement