Situation Ethics Flashcards
Antinomianism
Rejection of all moral laws, existentialism that the individual must decide what to do
Legalism
Over reliance on enforcing and applying endless rigid rules, forget what the main goal of the rules was in the first place, Jesus criticised this approach
What does Fletcher propose is the best approach to ethics
The middle ground between these two approaches that we should do the most loving thing in every situation which is different in every situation
What is Fletchers term for the most loving thing
Unconditional love or Agape
What are Fletchers four working principles that are the foundations to his theory
Pragmatism
Personalism
Relativism
Positivism
What was the William Brown incident
The ship struck an iceberg near Newfoundland and began to sink, one of the lifeboats was too full so the captain ordered male passengers into the sea who when they refused were thrown into the ocean
What does Fletcher say about the William Brown incident
The captain was right to do this, it was bravely sinful and the most loving thing because he sacrificed the life of a few men to save the life of many other women and children
Pragmatism
For something to be true it must be pragmatic, it must work in practice, theoretical solutions don’t work solutions must actually work and lead to good outcomes
Relativism
Right thing to do is situational, love is the reason to act but this must be applied in different ways depending on the situation
Positivism
Laws are things humans create, and we must bring about love in the decisions we make, he compares it to theologians faith
Personalism
Puts people at the centre of the decision making rather than adherence to the rules (as Jesus did)
What are the six propositions
1 - Only one thing is intrinsically good love
2 - Ruling norm of Christian decision is only love
3 - Justice is just love distributed so they are the same
4 - Love wills the neighbour good whether we like him or not
5 - Only the end justifies the means
6 - loves decision are made situationally
explain proposition 1
Some things may be extrinsically good like running to catch the bus, but running isnt good if someone is on a slippery floor, love is the only thing that is intrinsically good in everything
explain proposition 2
Jesus replaced Old Testament laws with love (healing on the sabbath), and enforced to love god and love thy neighbour
explain proposition 3
justice is christian love applied rationally and calculated, isnt a sentimental love but one for the good of all people
explain proposition 4
Love is an attitude not a feeling, it conveys an selfless commitment to treat others as best we can, parable of the Good Samaritan
explain proposition 5
If our intended aim is love then any means of attaining it is justified
explain proposition 6
Gather the facts of the matter before casting judgement on what is most loving, we can’t decide what is most loving before knowing the situation, christianity is too legalistic with sexua ethics
What was Joseph Fletchers book
Situation ethics a new morality
What does the greek background of the word agape suggest
Altruistic feeling that exists regardless of the circumstance or person
Reasons why situation ethics is helpful in moral decision making
- Love as a main principle is hard to object to
- person centred which seems close to Jesus teachings
- situation ethics allows a decision to be made in every circumstance which absolutists theories do not
- It is flexibile allowing people to uphold the spirit of the law without being obsessed with the law
- Considers the bigger picture doesn’t just apply a rule straight away
Reasons why situation ethics is not helpful in moral decision making
- Too vague as a relativist theory
- No moral boundaries or protection of human rights as everything is permitted if the situation was extreme enough
- requires people to make predictions about an outcome of their actions as the most loving but this is impossible to get right every time
- decision could have multiple consequences or longer term consequences that could be bad
- Is a christian utilitarianism as substitutes love for pleasure
- Christians disagree about what love is and how to practice it
How does Richard Mouw criticise situation ethics
Prioritising one biblical value in agape over another like gods commandments isnt christian and is wrong
How does Macquarrie criticise situation ethics
It is incurably individualistic so majority of people will never agree on the most loving thing as it is subjective