Situation Ethics Flashcards
Two unhelpful extremes in ethical thought
Legalism is an over reliance on applying endless rigid rules.
Antinomianism is literally a rejection of all moral laws
Agape
Situation ethics argues that there is one moral rule that we should do whatever is the most loving thing and that this needs to be applied to each unique situation we face. Love is the absolute, but we should relative it to the situation in front of us
The four working principles
Pragmatism
Relativism
Positivism
Personalism
Pragmatism
Philosophical approach to truth based on the work of American philosophers e.g William James and John Dewey
Fletcher argues that theoretical solutions that don’t lead to positive outcomes, are not really solutions at all, the decision we make must be something that works and produces good outcomes
Relativism
The right thing to do is dependent on the context. In ethics, we should avoid terms like always and never. Although the principle of love always applies love is the reason to act the specifics of how love applies varies between situations
Positivism
Unlike natural law, which argues that we can look into the world and effectively discover moral rules, situation ethics, is based on a positivist approach to law. Laws are things that human beings create; we have to be active in bringing about love by the decisions we make
Personalism
Situation ethics is person centred. Jesus placed people above rules. Consider the case of the woman caught in adultery. The key to good ethics is the place the good of people at the centre, rather than obedience to rules
The six propositions
Love is the only thing that is intrinsically good
Love is the ruling norm in ethical decision making and replaces all laws
Love and justice are the same thing. Justice is love that is distributed.
Love wills the neighbours good, regardless of whether the neighbour is liked or not
Love is the goal or end of the act, and that justifies any means to achieve that goal
Love decides on each situation as it arises without a set of laws to guide it
Phileo
Friendship love
Storge
Love based on Family connections
Eros
Sexual love - erotic
Agape
Charity unconditional love
Situation ethics may be seen as a helpful way of making moral decisions because
Flexibility - exceptional situations, hence avoiding the legalism that some versions of natural law may lead us to. Keep the spirit of the law without being obsessed with the letter of the law
Avoids conflicting duties which allows for a decision to be made in each situation
Person centred, closer to teachings of Jesus who put people above rules
Love as a principle is hard to object to. If we love others, we will want the best for them. More compassionate than utilitarianism which focuses on pleasure and pain
Situation ethics may be seen as an unhelpful way of making moral decisions because
Situation ethics faces the difficulty that, as a relativist theory, it is vague; the suggestion that we should do the most loving thing is not specific
No moral boundaries. Rape, genocide are just wrong there are no circumstances where they can be right
Teleological theory, have to make predictions upon outcomes which are unknown
Beginning and end. If I choose to kill to save a life, may cause a chain of events and revenge that lasts for generations. How much am I responsible for
Christian version of utilitarianism, instead of pleasure and pain it’s agape
Sophia
Greek word for wisdom - general principles logical laws