Single European Market 2 Flashcards
We will consider the airline industry and the single market.
When was EU’s airline industry liberalised?
1987-97 : over 10 years split into 3 stages.
whereas US airline liberated all at once
Aims of liberalisation
increase competition
benefit consumers
make Eu airlines more cost competitive globally
Pre-liberalisation state of airline industry
High fares
High barriers to entry
Limited number of airlines on a route (state duopoly - BA or AirFrance to get to France & split revenue)
Post-liberalisation state of airline industry (5)
Lower fares
More choice
Lower barriers to entry - compete on routes
Airlines could now fly from one foreign country to another foreign country. e.g Irish airline Ryanair can offer UK to France)
Development of low cost carriers (Ryanair - cuts AC by minimising engine time, and at airports where runways are easy to function in)
pg 10 is good for essay too
Ways Ryanair cut AC
No free food
Quick turnaround times for aircraft (25 mins) thus more time in air earning money
No reclining seats (saves £1m p.a)
Book online and print own tickets
How does Ryanair increase its TR, since standard tickets are so cheap
Sells food
Fee to put baggage in hold
Higher chargers if passengers check in bags/have no boarding card
All additional stuff contributes around 20% of their revenue
Why did EU liberalise the European airline market
Make EU airlines more globally efficient (previously US airlines were most efficient)
More competition to benefit consumers
Back to M&A - part of industrial restructuring following integration
Which nation performed the most M&A 1991-2002
UK - 31.4%
What does this imply about UK’s takeover rules
Very liberal, easy for foreigners to take over etc.
Whereas some members have very restructure takeover practices making M&A difficult
If UK are lenient while other members are not, what does this mean for restructuring effects
Lack of harmonisation amongst takeover rules means restructuring effects are varied across states.
Now we consider macro effects of the SEM. So far we only considered static benefits.
What did Baldwin argue
Dynamic gains may be 5 times greater than those in the Cecchini Report
Why were dynamic gains higher?
New capital formation - K accumulation increased growth of output per worker (since each worker has more capital to work with)
Why was Cecchini and Baldwin’s gains different
Cecchini thought liberalisation could not permanently raise growth rates
Baldwin thought it could
So Baldwin said dynamic gains 5x more than Cecchini (liberalisation can increase growth rates permanently)
What about their approximations for the medium term (10 years)
Baldwin 9% GDP compared to Cecchini 6.5%