Customs Unions Flashcards

1
Q

5 Levels of integration (least to highest)

A

Free trade area (FTA)
Customs union
Common market
Economic union
Total integration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where does the EU lie in terms of integration?

A

Between common market & economic union

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Example of a FTA

A

EFTA (the one UK set up in response to EEC success)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FTA characteristics (2)

A

Tariff free between countries within the agreement, but countries set their own tariffs against rest of the world

Rules of origin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Rules of origin are complex and costly to administrate. Which next level of integration can avoid this ?

A

Customs union

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Customs union

A

Tariff free between members, and 1 common external tariff! (CET)

Rules of origin within the union not required e.g goods from Germany to France

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Common market

A

Same as customs union (free movement of goods), but add free movement of FOP (labour and capital)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Economic union

A

Has common policies e.g EU’s euro.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Total integration

A

State merge to form 1 country

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Trade creation

A

Trade creation is the movement of production to a more efficient producer (e.g home to partner)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Trade diversion

A

Movement of production to a less efficient producer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Partial equilibrium analysis assumptions for the diagram

A

Partners and world supply curves are perfectly elastic (perfectly adjust to demand)

Consumers don’t differentiate - origin of good

Home & partner small, CU small

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

CU theory diagram - who are the most productive producers

A

Partner and rest of world are more productive with lower price and perfectly elastic supply curves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

2nd diag pg 24. Add a tariff to RoW supply and Partner’s supply. Would this be pre-post CU

A

So prices with tariff would be the higher prices so pre-CU (since CU makes free movement of g&S only for members of the agreement, not the RoW.)

(Ignore the dotted partners+tariff, since if partners then likely part of the agreement)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Pg 24. Looking at surpluses: where is tariff revenue?

Pre-CU…
Where is home production, imports, price, consumption,

A

Since pre CU we have tariffs, so Sw+tariff is the cheapest supply we get. So:

Home prod - Q2
Imports - Q2 to Q1
Consumption up to Q1 in total (home prod+imports)
Price P2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Post CU diagram - identify producer & consumer gains, and positive specialisation and substitution effects, loss

A

Fall in home production Q2 to Q4 , since CU means partner has no tariff and so go with them as more efficient.

Consumer welfare gain since cheaper prices for consumers. Producer gain as producing more efficiently at a lower cost/price.

17
Q

Where is trade creation and diversion demonstrated

A

X+y is trade creation
Z is diversion (loss)

18
Q

Given the TC and TD, what is Net gains expression

A

Net gain = TC - TD
X + Y = Z

19
Q

Empirical evidence of CU (Balassa)

Are they beneficial? Eval

A

Balassa found TC>TD i.e worth forming CU.
Eval: a static (one-off gain) of 0.15% of GDP, no dynamic benefits e.g economies of scale

20
Q

Critique of CU theory (6)

A

Static not dynamic
Simple assumptions
Measurement problems
Second best theory
Public goods arguement
TC&TD are not only effects of a CU

21
Q

Measurement problems - why and how

A

We use counterfactual analysis e.g look at what happens if UK had not joint EEC - so obvs no way to truly project knowing it is fully accurate.

22
Q

Note: recent studies also found a counterfactual loss to UK if it had not joined the EU = 2.1% GDP (so it was good to join!)

Of course unsure if fully correct tho

A
23
Q

Second best theory

A

The best option was global free trade, 2nd best was CU with tariffs for ROW (since in diagram the SW is still below SP

But we use the common external tariff to RoW instead and so perhaps not good

24
Q

Public goods argument for CU benefits: (3)

A

Bargaining strength after union
Pragmatic argument for free trade
Link with allies

25
Q

More examples of dynamic effects ignored

A

Rising productivity
Tech advancements
Concentration and market structures
E.O,S
Economies of experience

26
Q

Terms of trade effect

A

Improving ToT increases welfare