Similar Fact Evidence - Cri(6// 5) - Civil( 1) Flashcards

Inadmissible- rationale (4) Criminal * - makin case - similar allegation - John makindi v r - not for disposition but similar allegations - r v smith - allowed - dpp v boardman: male teacher ( the judge should weight the probative value against its prejudicial effect) -Dpp v p: lowered threshold to connection - r v h: judge generally assume allegation are true. List of admissibility of SFE - 5 (cc/ i/ i / k/ a) - r v bond - knowledge - r v straffen - identity of the accused Civil*

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Criminal
6 cases for Sfe + erosion

List of admissibility of sfe allowed ( 5 - with 4 cases)

Civil- 1 case

A
Makin v r 
Makindi v r 
R v smith 
Boardman v dpp 
Dpp v p
R v h 

S.14- 15 (5)

  • makin case
  • mohamed saed v reg
  • r v bond
  • r v straffen

Civil*- mood publishing v de wolf ( 2 step criteria)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly