Documentary Evidence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Private v public ( EA)

  • proof of public documents
  • PROOF OF private document - 1 case ( execution provision ) *** TO(1 case) C ( I case)
A

P v p = s.79 1 and 2
- proof of public documents = exceptions to hearsay rule
- proof of private documents = stamper v Griffen but s. 96 on exception of 20 year old documents
Testimony
opinion - r v silver lock ( s. 50)
Comparison - expert ( pope v r- didn’t cross examine)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Primary v secondary evidence ( 3 ways)

Types of primary evidence ( 3)

When can secondary evidence be used to prove documents??? S. 68 (((7 of them)

A
  • s. 65 ::::::ber ( 67)
  • s.66 ( cc/ c. Mechanical process/ counterparts docu / oral evidence)

Types of primary evidence:

  1. Original - par excellence
  2. Copy of document requiring registration
  3. Admission

S. 68 on exception to primary evidence

  1. Failure to produce after service - shji jessa & sons case
  2. Person out of reach
  3. Admission of documents of original
  4. Lost document - suddenly v lord Leonard ( will)
  5. Production impossible
  6. Public documents
  7. Numerous accounts or documents
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Extrinsic evidence (ea) —Inadmissible ( 1 case)

Limitations: 4

Exceptions: 6

A

S. 98 EA - inadmissible - Bank of Australia v palmer case

Limitations:

  1. Prove some facts
  2. Ambiguity
  3. Antecedent negotiations
  4. Prove date

Exceptions:

  1. Invalidate of contract
  2. Evidence of separate oral agreement
  3. Condition precedent
  4. Condition subsequent
  5. Usage and custom
  6. Facts relating to the provision of a contract to waisting Facts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Electronic evidence - exception to best evidence rule ( s.67)

Cases ( 4)

Scholar: 1

A

S. 78A v s.106B - certificate

Scholar: professor isaac rutenberg on s.78A repeals s.106B(4)

  1. Republic v barisa wayu matuguda ( certificate needed
  2. William odhiambo v iebc: reasons for certificate
  3. Muruli v Wycliffe oparanya: procedural technicality
  4. Monny gathoni v Catherine masitsa: flexible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly