Sick maintenance/ Bretha Crólige and related texts Flashcards
Subsections/ topics of Bretha Crólige to think of (7 topics)
- The texts and their transmission
- The principles of Sick maintenance
- Dating and when/ was it ever used?
- Evolution
- Exceptions
- Women/ Lawyers/ Children
- The incidental information sick maintenance provides about Irish society
Scholars to think about for sick maintenance (3)
- Binchy
- Breatnach
- Kelly
When mentioning Bretha colrige/ sick maintenence in an exam what MUST you also reference
§8 of Crith Galbrach
– provides a chronological distinction in usage
What is sick maintenence in principal?
Sick-maintenance, known as othrus, is, in principle, the practice whereby a person injured through the illegal actions of another is entitled to be looked after for the duration of their recovery at the expense of the guilty party.
What makes the study of sick maintenance a bit tricky?
The study of sick-maintenance, particularly any attempt to discern the finer details of the practice, is made somewhat convoluted by the fact that many of the tracts contradict each other (although contradicting evidence within Irish legal texts is somewhat to be expected).
- Also, as with many texts of this sort, we receive a lot of information about the ideals of legal application, but have very little information as to how such a law was applied in actuality.
What does kelly suggest as to why there is a discprenency between crith galbrach and bretha crolige?
Kelly suggests that the discrepancies between the different versions are either the result of varying local customs or a conflict of opinion between law-schools. But it is also possible that these differences are the result of the dates of the texts, and indeed the dating of the practice itself.
What does crith galbrach say about sick maintenance?
the interpolation that is contained in Críth Gablach (dated to c. 700AD) states that the practice was no longer in use.
when does Críth Gablach date from?
c. 700AD
What does Críth Gablach say the perpertrator owed their victim instead of the provision of sick maintenance?
Críth Gablach mentions some of what each individual is entitled to while being nursed according to his rank
- But also says it was no longer in use. Instead an additional fine encompassed the same provisions the injurer would have had to pay for under sick maintenance, which included a payment of his rank, the payment of the physician’s fee (fochraic) and a supply of food and drink and a payment for blemish or loss of limb.
- – this is a computation payment
What is the perpatrator liable for under the principle of othrus?
Under othrus, the perpetrator is liable not only for the payment of medical expenses relating to the injury, but also for the provision of suitable food and accommodation, appropriate to the status of the injured party, for the duration of the recovery period
What do we know about the actual application of orthus?
- We dont actually know the extent to which this was applied in reality, or the extent to which orthus was ever applied– in terms of chronology or geography
- How could we know?- there are no recordsof it being applied, and if it was applied and recorded- why wouldn’t they have survived?
- Take an argument anyway tho!
What does bretha crolige say about the application of the practice?
Bretha Crólige does not mention anything about the practice being obsolete. However, it does mention that certain types of person could not be maintained because of the difficulty in doing so
Comparison between Irish sick maintenance and Anglo-Saxon law and welsh law
– examples elsewhere.
AS law had a leochfeah– liable not only for the injury itself but also for the medical expenses of the injured party.
- The leachfeah payment looks much more like what C. Gal. describes, or indeed the Irish system could always have been like that.
- Welsh Law generally isn’t so interested in these type of things, focuses a bit more on homicide rather than on what happens if people are wounded. Although does have the list of payments for parts of the body.
Evolution of the word orthus
- In the earliest Old Irish texts, there was folog, a form of obligation where the injurer had to undertake the duty of nursing their victim back to health. It was also known as folog nothrusa or ‘maintenance of sickness’
- The word othrus eventually came to mean ‘sick maintenance’
How is the payment of orthus established?
There is some conflict in the sources but someone probably just decided on the ninth day. Perhaps as it would be more difficult to ascertain this before nine days? In the interval, the injured party is left in the care of their own kin (presumably)