Shareholders and Officers Flashcards
Officers
Owe the same duty of loyalty and care
Are agents of the corporation, so can bind the corporation within their authority unilaterally
Officers required
President and Secretary
One person can hold both positions
One person can be both plus the only director
Officer selection and removal
officers are selected and removed by the board
the board also sets officer compensation
Indemnification of Directors and officers
1) Corp. barred from indemnifying if person was adjudged liable on the basis of an improper financial benefit.
2) Corp. MUST indemnify person if she is “wholly” successful on the merits or otherwise in defending the suit AKA she wins a judgment on the entire case.
3) *Corp. MAY indemnify anything not satisfied by 1 or 2 (e.g. case settled)
Eligibility standard: must show the officer acted in good faith and w/ reasonable belief that her actions were in corporation’s best interest as determined by disinterested directors/disinterested shares/independent legal counsel.
Who determines whether there will be reimbursement?
1) majority vote of the disinterested directors or the disinterested committee or the disinterested shares
2) independent legal counsel
*Close corporation
a board of directors is not required, can be managed by the SH or by a single manager
will have few SH and stock is not publicly traded
Must state that it is a closed corporation in the certificate of formation
Likely closed corporation on bar exam
Likely closed corporation on bar exam
Shareholder Management Agreement
alternative way to manage a corporation in a close corporation
Can either by entered into in the certificate or bylaws and approved by all SH or written agreement of all SH
A copy of the SMA should be sent to all SH
SMA can be filed with the secretary of state - will give notice to all subsequent owners
Stock certificates of a close corporation
should state on the face that it is a close corporation
Close corporation duty of loyalty and care
The manager will owe the duty of loyalty and care
The SH will not owe to each other any duties but one can be found by the court
*Piercing the Corporate Veil (PCV)
Can only be done in close corporations!!!!
to PCV and hold SH personally liable, two things must be true:
- SH abused the privilege of incorporating; and
- limited liability would be unfair
Will be done to:
- SH abused privilege of incorporating
- achieve equity
Oppression
When you see a majority SH treating a minority SH unfairly. For oppression, we allow the harmed minority SH to sue because the minority SH in closely held corp has no way to cash out on her investment–not publicly traded.
In what type of case is a court going to be more willing to PCV?
Say this on bar:
Courts may be more willing to PCV for a tort victim than for a contract claimant because unlike a contract claimant, a tort victim did not voluntarily choose to transact with the corporation and did not knowingly assume the risk of limited liability.
Alter Ego (PCV)
SH was using the corporate assets as his own. Court might PCV if SH’s failure to respect the separate corporate entity harmed creditors.
Undercapitalization (PCV)
SH failed to invest enough (or to get insurance) to cover the corporation’s reasonably foreseeable liabilities. Thus a court might PCV because the corporation was undercapitalized when formed.
Can you PCV to go after a parent’s assets when corp is a subsidiary?
Yes–another corporation can be a SH. This is a big example when a parent corp forms a subsidiary to avoid its own obligations. Good set up for PCV
PCV and failure to observe corporate formalities
Will never be enough by itself
*Shareholder derivative suits
SH is suing to enforce the corporation’s cause of action, not her own personal claim. It’s a case where the corporation is not pursuing its own claim when it should, so SH steps in to challenge the corporation.
Always ask: could the corporation have brought this suit? If so, it’s a SH derivative suit.
*Requirements to Bring Derivative Suit
- Stock Ownership - when claim arose
- Own stock throughout the litigation- shows that adequately representing the corporation’s interests
- must have made a written demand on directors to bring the suit on behalf of the corp., setting forth the claims with particularity
- corporation must be joined as a defendant
- can only be settled or dismissed by court approval
*Written demand on the board for Derivative Suit
After demand has been made the SH must wait 90 days to file suit unless demand is rejected before the 90 days or waiting 90 days would cause irreparable damage to the corporation
MUST ALWAYS MAKE DEMAND, NEVER EXCUSED
*Stock ownership requirement for derivative suits
must have owned stock when the claim arose or have gotten it by operation of law from someone who did
*Inheritance or divorce decree (no stock that is bought)
*What happens if SH wins derivative suit?
The money from the judgment goes to the corporation
SH can recover costs and attorney fees from the corporation
What happens if SH loses derivative suit?
SH will not be able to recover costs and attorney fees
SH might be liable for the D’s attorney fees if sued for improper purpose or without a reasonable cause
Other SH are then barred from bringing the same suit
- Corp’s options in responding to notice of derivative suit
- may move to dismiss based upon determination by majority of independent and disinterested directors (or a committee of these) after a finding that the suit is not in the best interest of the company
- alternatively, the decision may be made by one or more disinterested and independent person(s) appointed by the court